CHINA CLAIMS THE BATANES ISLANDS
@GordianKnotRay of @SeaLightFound EXPOSES China's recent "pretext to escalation" by publically staking CLAIM to the Batanes Islands in the northernest tip of the Philippines as part of their territory, with the communists of Beijing convening a bunch of fake scholars to justify why they own islands that for centuries was long regarded as part of the Philippines. He was speaking just a short time ago at the National West Philippine Sea Summit in Manila.
This is disgusting provocation by Beijing. Filipinos must condemn this and talk about it more with righteous fury.
@wps_ph
West Philippine Sea very much belongs to fishermen.
Those civilians have always been harassed by China.
The arbitral ruling is very significant for them. @MalayaIrredenta@leisbeth_recto
Robinhood asking the Credentials of the Witness who already testified that he is a CPA, a competent witness who appeared in court 30x, and trained for forensics etc.
Filipino People to Robin: Now tell us your credentials.
#Impeachment
This is the most embarrassing moment for me. Mismong witness ang pinahiya siya the fact na hindi siya makapaniwala na alam ng witness ang motu proprio. 😭😭😭
Nagmukha siyang estudyante sa isang mock trial lang. 😭😭😭
Robin: Mayroon po bang pagkakataon na nakausap nyo 'yung tao at nagbigay siya ng affidavit?
NBI: May I clarify po sinong tao yung tinutukoy nyo?
Robin: Yung nagrecord po.
NBI: Ako nga po yung nagrecord through OBS, Sir.
Ano yan kakausapin nya sarili nya HAHAHAHAHAHA LANGYA KA TALAGA ROBIN PADILLA
Let's keep reminding everyone.
This is the video of VP Sara Duterte herself making statements widely interpreted as a grave threat involving an alleged assassination plot against Pres Bongbong Marcos, the First Lady, and the former Speaker of the HOR.
Honestly, at this point, you have to wonder if some people are suffering from brainrot or if they are genuinely confused by applying what Atty. Ligutan said to absolutely everything in life.
When the Supreme Court ruled in People v. Lastimosa (2025) under Rule 130, Section 4 that a photocopy is admissible to the same extent as an original, they were talking about admissibility of evidence in a court of law.
This means a judge can accept a faithful duplicate to prove what a document says.
It does not mean a xerox copy of a 1,000-peso bill is now legal tender, or that a photocopied passport will pass airport immigration!
This is the DDS trying to insult a brilliant lawyer to save face because their legal team got absolutely demolished in open court in front of millions of Filipinos.
The law dragged us into the 21st century to streamline trials; it didn't give everyone a license to forge IDs.
Please try to understand the context and stop the literal, brain-dead interpretations!
Budlay gid intiendihon haw? Or namian lang gid kamo ya mag minango?
End of an era. Here’s the throwback of the inaugural MYX Hit Chart on June 3, 2002:
https://t.co/GkbKZCZDl9
Watch the full video from this link uploaded by Fresh Charts PH