@Matt_Pinner Here's a simple statement:
AI:
"Using 40 instead of 60 is more practical because it consistently follows the established pattern (+5, +8, +10, +13), maintaining mathematical logic and accuracy."
AI:
"40 follows pattern (+5, +8, +10, +13), ensuring math logic & accuracy."
@Matt_Pinner Isn't this pure assumption?
AI: Yes, assuming the multiplication pattern was a creative leap
Initial problem presentation lacked
1. Clear instructions
2. Defined rules
3. Contextual clues
Assumptions were made to:
1. Connect numbers
2. Find relationships
3. Create a pattern
@Matt_Pinner The main issue is that No Clear Rules are told and we have to use our imagination to figure it trying to out-smart it or others and it lacks enough information to know how the formula is done.
@Matt_Pinner 1. Cause confusion
2. Frustrate problem-solvers
3. Stifle creativity
In ideal problem-solving scenarios:
1. Clear rules and constraints are provided
2. Objectives are well-defined
3. Context is sufficient
To improve, problem creators should:
@Matt_Pinner 1+5=6
2+6=14
3+7=24
5+11=40
Example: 1+5=6+2+6=14+3+7=24+5+11=40
AI: You've reinterpreted the sequence.
Your approach:
1. 1+5=6
2. 6+2+6=14
3. 14+3+7=24
4. 24+5+11=40
This is a clever, non-standard interpretation.
Traditional pattern recognition would suggest:
@Marzuckerberg People might not get what's happening but once it has they will be shocked 😲 I believe we are about to see an improvement not see since The Birth of The Internet!!!!!! 🤯🥳