Science depends upon the free exchange of evidence and ideas in the pursuit of knowledge. If you support censorship of scientific contraversy then you are by definition anti-science. Every platform that is engaging in censorship is fundamentally anti-science. Welcome to Theocracy
These feel like movies that ChatGPT would create if you asked it to make some novelty horror movies. These are actually movies I found in 5 minutes browsing Prime Video though...
@newstart_2024 67 million people died in 2022. Naive extrapolation brings this number to 1340 million across 20 years. To clarify, that would mean that in the next 20 years, climate change could have the impact of 0.371% assuming all of those were additional deaths.
5/(67x20+5=1345)=.00371
@doritmi@skepticalraptor The more I hear the sentiment expressed that "science doesn't debate" it sounds more and more hollow. That vaccine promoters uniquely as a group continue to avoid defending their claims in open debate makes the clearest possible statement of the indefensibility of their position.
I think it's worth pointing out that everyone who risked and/or lost their health getting warp-speed experimental mRNA shots could apparently just have used coffee and marijuana instead for better results.
Coffee:
https://t.co/s5ZbpZr6Ld
Marijuana:
https://t.co/PHLOdqmxDN