@jeffkiefer23@JoeWalsh0022@love_paranoiaa@Dretheguard congrats you noticed two different words. now let’s see if you can put 2 and 2 together and figure out why homicide is still relevant to a discussion ab violence against women
@stvelli@StardustnoKenJr@Dretheguard i mean that only really addresses severity not whether the term is derogatory in the first place, calling a white woman a “snow bunny” specifically in the context of a black man wanting to have sex with her reduces her to her race + sexual desirability
@Dannydimez63690@sopretty_niy@Matr3llz@spicebae_ “9/10” lol thousands of student encounters have resulted in arrests in nyc. they have an entire system specifically for police involvement in school related incidents. Afor effort tho
@chaeloric@cherrygrl24@jutesnighten34@TifahCrump777@spicebae_ if they’re mėntally chållenged like you and everyone else in these replies, yes. any competent school administration would understand that being wrong first does not automatically excuse everything that happens afterward.
@uncxntrxllable the hypothetical was already introduced by the people endorsing swinging on the teacher. im just responding to it
i dont have to devote every subsequent sentence to the teacher
@uncxntrxllable This is why reading compression is important.
My point wasn’t that they literally said, “children need to start swinging.”
My point was that saying “if you touch my hair, I’m swinging” in response to a video of a teacher touching students is endorsing that reaction.
@Dannydimez63690@sopretty_niy@Matr3llz@spicebae_ you’re way too confident about what the vid would prove. a recording of the teacher initiating it could be important evidence but it doesn’t automatically make whatever the student does next lawful. “but she touched me first, here’s the video1!1!” yeah good luck with that
@uncxntrxllable Wow, revolutionary strategy for “protecting the youth”. Encourage them to swing on adults, potentially get arrested, and face criminal charges that could follow them for years. Truly groundbreaking guidance.
@uncxntrxllable They’re clearly endorsing punching someone in response to unwanted touching. Normalizing the idea that the kids should respond violently *is* encouraging kids to be violent. We can call out the teacher for her behavior without pretending a punch is legally/ practically equivalent
@sopretty_niy@Matr3llz@spicebae_ Lmao, yeah go ahead and swing off on her. New York specifically classifies that as second-degree assault, a Class D felony. Doing that on school grounds with the injured person being a school employee could land you 2-7 years in jail. They aren’t gonna care about your edges.
@lvrofari@Matr3llz@spicebae_ The teacher deserves to lose her job and the video was 100% weird. I think people encouraging the students to physically assault and beat on her are just as odd though.
@lvrofari@Matr3llz@spicebae_ They’re in New York where basic assault statute generally requires physical injury.
Smacking her hand away? Yeah, I think that’s very plausibly defensible. But swinging on her? Not really. “She touched my hair, so now I get one free punch” isn’t how self-defense works.
@cherrygrl24@jutesnighten34@TifahCrump777@spicebae_ They’d end up in jail with no education all because of your terrible advice. “I assaulted her because she was forcibly touching my edges1!1!1!” Lmao, fucking idiot. She’s a weirdo but she isn’t causing you harm in anyway. This isn’t baddies, they will lock you up!
@Matr3llz@spicebae_ Cause why would they swing on her lol? You guys genuinely think assault is the answer to everything - these kids would end up in jail with no education. This isn’t Baddies.