Most on here just want your money, they don't care if you make any.
I'm all for subscriptions if you actually learn how to invest from it, not just for stock picking. Learn how to create a strategy, how to analyse stocks, how to manage your portfolio...
"I bought a new stock today, I shared it with my subscribers only" is the most used sentence to lure you in. Yet, many investors fall for it. What is the added value of that sentence for the user? Nothing, they just want you to subscribe.
Enough free stock pickers you can follow in my opinion.
The guy who got caught was a 33 year old retired stock picker who gave away paid content for free (on a second page) and made publicity to subscribe to his page for $5 a month...
If he is retired, it's because the subscribers fund him.
I don't have subscription because I don't feel I can provide enough added value yet. A subscription should make sure, it learns its followers how to invest. Trying to learn investors how to fish, not just give them fish.
Anyway, be carefull, subscribe if it gives you real added value and enjoy all the free content on here.
Alright, here’s my $MU thesis:
In 100 years, Micron Technology invents time travel.
And right now, people from the future are coming back in time to buy the stock before it goes completely parabolic.
@JLMarin_Trading JL, te recomiendo Fluence Energy. Ticker FNLG . Está aguantando muy bien el chaparrón y tiene una proyección interesante en relación a la tesis energética. Gracias y Saludos