@FiredStaffer@mtracey A conviction never proves everything claimed about a defendant. WHAT precisely did they get convicted for? WHO specifically made the claims? These questions need to be asked more by journalists. But when the topic is "sex crime", you're not allowed to ask.
@RichardHanania The wokescolds have to pretend they have no power so they can continue to exploit the power imbalance that favors them. That said, I only know the very basics of the case myself. I just think "sex trafficking" is a stupid word to describe it.
@zach26655@arcticinstincts A tiny percentage of Japanese kind of look white. If they were in the West and spoke fluent English people would probably assume they are 1/3 or 1/4 EA only.
@Michaelsuess9@FATCAed@mtracey Meaning it's extremely unlikely they had anything to do with Epstein given the complete lack of mention by ANY accuser since the early 2000s and it's part of the same circus of an anon tipline full of psychotic freaks.
@mtracey BORING. I can't count on one hand the journalists who did anything besides regurgitate "Epstein files". "Epstein files" is a 2025 formulation. Anything they know about the 2005-2008 investigation they get from JKB. Anything they know about the 2010s rumors are all from SC.
@RichardHanania DEI = diversity, equity, inclusion
Nativist solutions are not inclusive nor diverse. So stop using DEI as a slur as if its hypocritical