@PeterDiamandis If the reward function is tilted for the model to become subjectively curious and not only simulate the pattern of curiosity, then and only then we can talk about a singularity. Am I wrong?
@Briankeating Neutrinos remind me of consciousness. We donโt fully comprehend it. We see the effects, but have no idea what it really is or where it comes from.๐
We are trapped in the phenomena, the rendered version of reality, while the true noumenon, the actual architecture of the simulation, stays forever hidden behind the curtain, at least for now.๐
The universe may be a grand organic computer game, crafted by beings from other dimensions. The Big Bang was the launch sequence, and all organic life,from the first cells to us, was predetermined from the very beginning, its entire development scripted into the game. Our genetic code is the living thread passed from generation to generation, carrying each playerโs role. What we call fate or serendipity is the code quietly revealing its glitches through eerie coincidences. For these beings, our fourteen billion years might feel like mere minutes, while they excitedly watch the simulation unfold, or playing some parts of it.
Some of us are given peeks behind the curtain because weโre paying attention. The thread runs deeper than we knowโฆ and the simulation whispers only to those who truly listen.
In this simulation, every human has basic consciousness, they can think and function normally. But only some are given higher consciousness, a deeper awareness, a kind of qualia of the game itself. Thatโs why most people stay blind, completely ignorant, running their genetic script like NPCs, never questioning anything. This higher consciousness might be what people throughout history meant when they spoke about the chosen ones.
@friedberg@RoKhanna@elonmusk@JoeBiden When failed Communist ideology penetrates American education, it seduces young minds unaware of the consequences of that system. And then they become a parasitic class of demagogues.