LuigiGotShrooms

[LuigiGotShrooms @VDDelgado33]

@ZMDawah @shemaistheway @BeggarWithBread @TheBiblicalUnie He is outside of time. He created it.

[LuigiGotShrooms @VDDelgado33]

@GeorgeLee158223 @shemaistheway @BeggarWithBread @TheBiblicalUnie Yup

[LuigiGotShrooms @VDDelgado33]

@G_David_Keller @EvanAKilgore Of all of the names listed its nick. If I had to pick outside of the available choices I would say Crowder.

[LuigiGotShrooms @VDDelgado33]

@TheBiblicalUnie @shemaistheway @BeggarWithBread So you have no public debates?

[LuigiGotShrooms @VDDelgado33]

@Ranierose17 @SueZieCue @Rach4Patriarchy Maybe you're right! I probably wouldn't be able to participate in a jury that has to deliberate based on immoral laws.

[LuigiGotShrooms @VDDelgado33]

Do you have any public debates available? Im really not interested in reading your entire book at the moment, and your argument on John 1:1 that I saw was "John can't be calling Jesus God because as we've discussed in this book God is one. Unless you want to provide an argument for why God is only one, i don't know what to say lol.

[LuigiGotShrooms @VDDelgado33]

@TheBiblicalUnie @shemaistheway @BeggarWithBread Then what is it?

[LuigiGotShrooms @VDDelgado33]

@PatsyDiabetes Death penalty is the correct answer.

[LuigiGotShrooms @VDDelgado33]

@shemaistheway @BeggarWithBread @TheBiblicalUnie "The word was with God and the word was God."

[LuigiGotShrooms @VDDelgado33]

@shemaistheway @BeggarWithBread @TheBiblicalUnie Okay, so from your interpretation we have a created being who is also God? If not then what is your defense of John calling Jesus God?

[LuigiGotShrooms @VDDelgado33]

She clearly deliberately strangled her children one after another. She knew where she had done it, she told her husband where they were. If a person is blackout drunk does that eliminate their responsibility if they shoot an innocent person? Not in my eyes, If it does to you then idk what else to say. Also, laws can be written in unjust ways. The fact that it IS the law does not mean that it SHOULD be the law. Understand? The correct take on this case is capital punishment, full stop.

[LuigiGotShrooms @VDDelgado33]

God is outside of time. There was never a time where God and his Son did not exist. "Today" is eternity. We have to take the bible as a whole and not independently interpret each verse.
For example John 1: 1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
The word is identified as the Son. Why is he being identified as eternal and of the same nature as the Father if he was created?

[LuigiGotShrooms @VDDelgado33]

You are demonstrating my point perfectly. It does not matter if a man is able to understand postpartum depression. My contention to you would simply be this, whether or not psychosis or her feewings are the cause is irrelevant. The only fact that is relevant in this case is that she strangled her 3 innocent children, one at a time. That kind of behavior is incompatible with a moral society, and she MUST be executed for her atrocities. No buts, no what about this... all irrelevant. Allow her some time in prison to get her soul right with God if you must, then to the firing squad. That is justice, and empathy will 100% get in the way of that.

[LuigiGotShrooms @VDDelgado33]

@TheEnigmatic_01 @RealCandaceO I just don't understand how she can be so stupid. How in the world does him pleading not guilty mean that he didn't turn himself in and admit guilt? He is probably pleading not guilty, because a plea deal wasnt offered right? Just kill me man I can't take it😂

[LuigiGotShrooms @VDDelgado33]

@loveof_reason @NickJFreitas Yea but its ultimately the responsibility of the woman. The boyfriend/husband can't stop her. Execute the abortionists, they are just as responsible.

[LuigiGotShrooms @VDDelgado33]

@SueZieCue @Rach4Patriarchy @Ranierose17 Doesn't evidence have to be interpreted? Evidence doesn't speak for itself, it needs a measured and logical interptor to draw meaning from it. A woman who is overly empathetic towards the defendant is likely to interpret the evidence poorly.

[LuigiGotShrooms @VDDelgado33]

@Witness2Roswell @Rach4Patriarchy @reinventideal There can be exceptions for women who are as effective as Rachel. Especially when we are in the state that we are as a nation. I'm sure Rachel would be happy to retire to the kitchen once the child murdering demons are brought to heel.

[LuigiGotShrooms @VDDelgado33]

@ashfroggy3 Death of his wife's child*

[LuigiGotShrooms @VDDelgado33]

@ashfroggy3 Ash, the person he is responding to is using the death of his wife's against him, and you are taking issue with his response? You have to be purposefully antagonistic, because this is ridiculous.

[LuigiGotShrooms @VDDelgado33]

@GuapaGrounded @ashfroggy3 They don't claim to be role models for Christians to follow.