@Savanna221988 Every time Harry comes out with statements like that he is literally describing himself . He is a bitter , twisted man who left believing people woukd be falling at his feet . If anyone is power hungry it’s him .
Nigel Farage's first act was not to heed the advice of Mark Nowak.
His first act was to take to social media.
Max Wilkinson MP on why Farage's divisive and hate-filled rhetoric makes things in Britain worse.
“His response has been to appeal for rage. That’s his response to a father who has lost his son and asked for that not to happen. Exploiting this tragedy to create grievance and division would be wrong in any circumstances but to do it when the family are expressly saying please don’t is unforgivable. It shows exactly who he is”
Keir Starmer responds to Nigel Farage at #PMQs
BBC: We're discussing Henry Novak's tragic case so let's have far right grifter Matt Goodwin on to stoke division and call out 'racism to white people.' Well done BBC. You've promoted the rise of the far right and now you're determined to enable a Reform govt. #PoliticsLive
Gary Lineker, "I actually think that 80-90% of the country just want to get on with their lives, be friendly with their neighbours" "They don't look at people of different religions, skin colours, beliefs, traits, and think badly of them"
Who agrees with Gary True words to me
🚨Whilst out canvassing, @RobKenyonReform let slip to potential voters he prefers an insurance based healthcare and 'his' new hospital would provide two tier healthcare, with NHS patients treated differently.
Mr @christiancalgie has been busy putting out a partial version of events these last few days, amplified by yourselves.
I think it’s time all your readers had the whole story. They were all out of order and, if they had any decency, would now hold their hands up and apologise.
If you really love your country instead of marching through London with a flag go and do something productive for your community. Spend your Saturday volunteering, making a real difference. Unless it’s not about that at all and is just an excuse for racist hate propaganda…
Watch this from Historian Sir Anthony Seldon 👏
➡️ Calls to wipe student debt and pay for it out of general taxation
➡️ Bring in Martin Lewis and give him four weeks to find a solution
➡️ There are no dead end courses eg the arts, stresses universities are so much more,
"Education is the great human activity, it is the liberation of the soul and the human mind"
The govt's Student Loan Plan 2 repayment freeze in April 2027 must be reversed. It isn't moral.
I'm concerned that my debate with Kemi Badenoch this morning distracts from the most immediate problem. In April 2027 Rachel Reeves will freeze the Plan 2 student loan threshold until 2030 which by then will increase graduate repayments by £300/yr more.
This is effectively a unilateral negative breach of the student loan contract. Students were told the threshold would rise with average earnings. No commercial lender would be allowed to do this. The govt shouldn't do it either.
Changing the terms of future students loans is a political decision - people may not like it but it is transparent. Negatively changing the terms of contracts already signed, and long in place, is a breach of natural justice.
An entire generation has been sold out by successive Governments, trapped by Student Loan interest rates so high even a loan shark would hesitate.
I graduated as a doctor with around £75,000 of debt. After years of repayments, I now owe close to £90,000. That is the reality of Plan 2 loans: extortionate interest rates mean balances can rise even while regular deductions are taken from your salary.
We’re told this system is “fair.” The Chancellor, @RachelReevesMP, has defended it as such. But I struggle to see how a system can be described as fair when those who can afford to pay upfront leave university owing nothing beyond the headline fee, while those from less financially secure backgrounds carry escalating balances for decades.
Freezing repayment thresholds while interest continues to accrue increases the real burden on graduates year after year. The Labour Education Secretary, @bphillipsonMP, may prefer to debate who first introduced tuition fees, but that does not change the fact that the current Government is actively maintaining this structure.
Successive governments may have built this structure, but the current Government is choosing to maintain it. And that choice has consequences. For many of us, this no longer resembles a conventional loan. It functions as a long-term graduate tax that quietly removes a significant portion of our income every month, often well into our 40s or 50s.
If this Government believes in growth, productivity and social mobility, it cannot defend a model that disproportionately burdens those without family wealth. Reform is within its power: cap the interest, review the thresholds, and redesign the structure so that repayment reduces debt in a meaningful way.
Governing is about taking responsibility for the system you oversee. The question now is whether this Government intends to defend the status quo or change it.