VB

product designer #ux #ui pixel art, comedy, winter storms, vidya games, carpentry, blah blah blah. hi, i'm dad. tweets are my own.

[VB @vinburgh]

@RachelTrue @RedCat73 This isn’t even a response to what he said

[VB @vinburgh]

@thepetnationn @lporiginalg 9 = 90. The difference between the numbers on the right increase by 2 with every step, starting at 6.

[VB @vinburgh]

@KSI "Anyway I don’t know shit about Crypto. I tried and lost millions."

Damn, Logan got you with CryptoZoo too?

[VB @vinburgh]

@MalianLovesYou @elonmusk @occupymars42069 @therabbithole There is no art, creativity, and/or culture without some sort of adversity or struggle to back it. Good luck with that oversold dream though!

[VB @vinburgh]

@rawsalerts When is this happening, for goodness sake

[VB @vinburgh]

@RaphaelsHat @austin_malerba This. There's folks coming up in the field that are learning that tw is the way to style. It's going to be ugly for them when the next new shiny thing comes along but they're still in bed with a glorified inline styling method.

[VB @vinburgh]

@jdan The shape of the highlight is the exact same shape as the bottom of the bottom

[VB @vinburgh]

@nicksortor @krassenstein He's just being provocative to up his engagement numbers on here. Tweets by the Krassensteins vs their appearances in Spaces are night and day.

They don't believe half the shit they tweet, otherwise they'd call out their own for similar transgressions.

Ignore 'em

[VB @vinburgh]

@DougCollinsUX Mooood

[VB @vinburgh]

@KP4NC @mtaibbi @ShellenbergerMD No, no, it's not. Certainly not to voters...

[VB @vinburgh]

@korngrower @GPrime85 I was speaking in context. You still haven't answered my follow-up questions

[VB @vinburgh]

@LauraPowellEsq I don't hate the idea of long-form tweets but I'd like to see the team put a bit more thought into the experience.

A simple "show more" link cheapens it & makes it feel disconnected. Unsure what the solution would be but some good ol' solid UX trench work will sort it out.

[VB @vinburgh]

@korngrower @GPrime85 Better yet, lets say you meet a woman and she has a vagina (as you'd assume). However, she has her vagina because of SRS since she happens to be trans. Is that "gay" to you?

Do you not understand the irony in any of your arguments?

[VB @vinburgh]

@korngrower @GPrime85 Continuing with that logic: because you assume they have a penis, that's where you draw the line? The appearance of what is traditionally male isn't where you draw it?

If you found out they had a vagina, would that change your opinion?

[VB @vinburgh]

@korngrower @GPrime85 So then, by that logic, you can theoretically find yourself attracted to / aroused by someone that appears traditionally male as long as they have a vagina, right?

How is that not more "gay"?

[VB @vinburgh]

@jwpatx1485 @GPrime85 I don't know if I agree w/ that. For some, sure. But it can easily be argued that accepting your partner's otherwise-unconventional genitals is no different than accepting any other health issue or disposition between partners in "normal" relationships.

[VB @vinburgh]

@MarioNawfal Ever notice how in any movie that features an AI-centric environment, there's never any art hanging on the walls? Star Wars, 2001, etc

[VB @vinburgh]

@MarioNawfal One might say AI will be the death of art and culture. When AI replaces everything, it eliminates the human struggle (which is where art tends to come from).

[VB @vinburgh]

@Monsterclowd @GPrime85 When did I say gender dysphoria isn't a mental disorder? Also, this isn't the first time you've misattributed me

When I referred to your pol ideology, it was to point out your scattered arguments that kept derailing the discussion. I'm here to learn; you seem keen on lecturing

[VB @vinburgh]

@pneumatoo @GPrime85 This can certainly be true at times. However, I'm trying to look at it in a vacuum while making some relative assumptions to help simplify the discussion.