Vinnie Angelo

Follower of Jesus/Husband of Sheila/Father of Matteo/Hitter of Drums/Lover of Oakland Sports/Actor of Voice 🎙️[email protected]

[Vinnie Angelo @vinnieangelo]

@Svigel As a voiceover artist who narrates a ton of audiobooks, I thank you for using a real person!

[Vinnie Angelo @vinnieangelo]

@PTSportsFix 100% of the time

[Vinnie Angelo @vinnieangelo]

@dalepartridge I mean, shouldn’t you start with “repeal the 1st amendment” in order to enact 5, 8, 10?

[Vinnie Angelo @vinnieangelo]

@JHGoodman8404 Shouldn’t the concern be more towards people with honorary doctorates who refer to themselves (or allow themselves to be referred to) as “doctor”? Ala, “dr” John MacArthur? That’s an actually issue. No need to pick semantic fights over actual earned degeees

[Vinnie Angelo @vinnieangelo]

@DefiantBaptist @PanicanExposer @tonyelgringo12 For sure, bro. I can’t argue with a dude who has “receipts”….way to pwn another godless liberal. You’re crushing it! #john13:34

[Vinnie Angelo @vinnieangelo]

@DefiantBaptist @PanicanExposer I’m glad you have a community on twitter now, because you are going to be so lonely in eternity in heaven.

[Vinnie Angelo @vinnieangelo]

@radiojoee This clip is filled with GOATS.

[Vinnie Angelo @vinnieangelo]

@joebhorton @RFWill149 @LastDiveBar The hero we need

[Vinnie Angelo @vinnieangelo]

@Br453tge @realmattcarr @tomascol 10000% true. Heartbreaking, ain’t it?

[Vinnie Angelo @vinnieangelo]

@TylerLeeConway @les_kendrick “It’s her job” = so she’s “for sale”?

[Vinnie Angelo @vinnieangelo]

@TylerLeeConway Word

[Vinnie Angelo @vinnieangelo]

@CoachLisle I prefer to be updog

[Vinnie Angelo @vinnieangelo]

@warriorsworld @LastDiveBar “Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Oakland, Alameda County Coliseum”

[Vinnie Angelo @vinnieangelo]

@NeilShenvi Outside of a more fundamentalist or highly confessional school (where a strict statement of faith has a clear checklist) how could this even be a thing? Not everything has a category or trajectory.

[Vinnie Angelo @vinnieangelo]

@chadafrancis @amurch @PrestonSprinkle IMO, to argue from a more systematic/theological presupposition puts one in the “dogma” camp

[Vinnie Angelo @vinnieangelo]

@chadafrancis @amurch @PrestonSprinkle This is where I’d push back on the “dogma” comment. I think voices (especially) like Gupta and Bird’s are significant in this discussion, as they both started from a complimentarian position & have changed perspectives based on the text…

[Vinnie Angelo @vinnieangelo]

@chadafrancis @amurch @PrestonSprinkle As a non-egalitarian, I’m grateful for tools like Nijay Gupta’s “Tell her story” & Michael Bird’s “A case for Gender Equality” in helping understand the text. That’s the goal = understanding the text in its original meaning, not within our traditions (Which I know u know)

[Vinnie Angelo @vinnieangelo]

@chadafrancis @amurch @PrestonSprinkle E.g., the NPP is built on novel sociological findings from the DSS, giving us a MUCH clearer/closer look at 1st cent Judaism than Luther’s perspective does—which would’ve been a then novel theological conclusion—helping us w/ a better understanding of the NT writers’ message

[Vinnie Angelo @vinnieangelo]

@chadafrancis @amurch @PrestonSprinkle I usually agree that novel theological conclusions should be questioned. But to dismiss them as merely novel and not serious really shuts off a valuable hermeneutical tool, especially when we’re trying to engage in the exegetical process of reading an epistle…