Forensic confirmed that the video is genuine means no alteration or modification. Does that confirm that the person is @BhagwantMann .. No
Forensics can confirm if the video is real or AI, it cannot confirm the identification of the person
देश की महामहिम राष्ट्रपति श्रीमती द्रौपदी मुर्मु जी को जन्मदिन की शुभकामनाएँ।
ईश्वर से आपके उत्तम स्वास्थ्य, सुख, समृद्धि एवं दीर्घायु जीवन की कामना करता हूँ।
@rashtrapatibhvn
राम मंदिर में चढ़ावा चोरी मामले पर उत्तर प्रदेश के मुख्यमंत्री योगी आदित्यनाथ ने पहला बयान दिया है. सीएम योगी आदित्यनाथ ने कहा है कि "सबूत हो तो SIT को दें. दूध और दूध और पानी का पानी होगा" आगे सीएम ने कहा कि "SIT जांच में सब साफ हो जाएगा. अयोध्या को बदनाम करने वालों के बहकावे में न आएं. कुछ लोग नहीं चाहते कि अयोध्या का विकास हो...अपराधी कोई भी हो, बचेगा नहीं" उन्होंने आगे कहा कि "समाजवादी पार्टी के दोहरे चरित्र को देखो. कह रहे हैं कि राम भक्तों का अपमान हुआ है. कारसेवकों पर गोली चलाने वाले लोग आज उपदेश देने चले हैं. सभी राम भक्तों से अपील है कि अयोध्या के बारे में जो सुनने को मिला. हमने ट्रस्ट के अनुरोध पर SIT जांच बैठाई है. SIT जांच दूध का दूध और पानी का पानी करके रहेगी"
#RamMandir #YogiAdityanath #Ayodhya #ABPNews
@BJP4India Bjp wale chutiya hi hai hamesha se
Modi ki photos dekhi hai naa? Tab moog me koi gau moot gayi hogi ya gobar kar di hogi
Kich bola nhi jaa raha hoga
If I could sit across from my younger self today, I'd simply say: "We made it."
Thank you, everyone, for the overwhelming love, wishes, and blessings on my birthday.
He seems to be mentally unstable anyway.. he is a failure
Pahalgaam, pulwana just 2 recent failures
Any accountability?? No
May make some Movies Later to justify failure
What an insensitive thing to say. Pathetic attacks in the name of politics, forgetting he's not a politician and has worked his whole life for securing India under many governments.
The man is 81 years old, his job is to use his brains and strategy to keep India secure from multiple threats and project power, in which he has done a commendable job. Like one comment said, it's like attacking Stephen Hawking as incompetent.
What justice to Meenakshi Natarajan?
The issue was never whether the Telangana court had jurisdiction. The issue is that she did not disclose the case against her while filing her nomination papers.
The case has not been adjudicated on merits. The trial court merely returned the complaint for presentation before the appropriate court, citing lack of territorial jurisdiction. That is a procedural step, not an exoneration.
The Returning Officer acted on the facts available before him. The Supreme Court also declined to interfere at that stage and advised her to pursue the statutory remedy of an election petition before the High Court.
Attempting to portray a jurisdictional transfer as proof of innocence is misleading. The real question remains unanswered: why was the Telangana court proceeding not disclosed in the nomination papers in the first place?