Víctor Álvarez

TeI. MMA Amateur. Wrestling.
Gijón, 1998.

[B 🇪🇸 @b_bbirddd]

estaba buscando otra cosa y me he encontrado este tweet

mayo 2025, un año antes del accidente de Adamuz

[El camión que transportó la cabaña @MrLorry]

“Me parece tremendamente injusto y peligroso que haya tener arrojo en el ejercicio de la función jurisdiccional.”

Nuestra libertad y patrimonio está en manos de gente estancada en los 12 años mentales, incapaces de asumir que se requiere valor para ejercer la autoridad.

[Juan Sánchez @JSanchezTorron]

Otra enseñanza no menos importante: la violencia, la venganza y la represión tienen un valor educativo y civilizador fundamental.
Por supuesto, hay toda una serie de problemas asociados a su correcta administración, y a quién debe hacerlo. Es cierto que no hay instituciones de justicia que puedan funcionar si, sobrepasado un límite, no asumen el monopolio de su ejercicio. Pero tampoco hay civilización que se sostenga si los particulares renuncian incondicionalmente a ellas. Y la civilización es condición previa de la justicia institucional.

[Ciriaco™ @Ciriaco_SPQR]

Nada me da más pereza que los midwits que se deslumbran con los datos. Los datos son importantes en la medida en que estemos teniendo la conversación correcta desde la perspectiva correcta, pero primero hay que establecer eso.

Cada dos por tres me encuentro con intercambios absurdos en esta red social. Si yo digo que ZP es un ladrón y tú me contestas que no porque Chitalu marcó 107 goles en 1972, obviamente me la suda ese dato por muy cierto que sea. Pues siempre viene el simple de turno a decirte que al menos el otro aporta datos. Sí, datos estúpidos que no vienen al caso.

Con el tema migratorio pasa exactamente eso. No hay ninguna cantidad de gráficas económicas que me puedan convencer de que debería hacer desaparecer mi país como tal, porque no es una preocupación de naturaleza económica.

"La tasa de fertilidad en España aboca al descenso de la población y por eso hay que importar millones de personas, aquí tienes la grafiquita que muestra la proyección del descenso". Muy bien, pero esa conclusión te la sacas del cimbel ¿por qué no puedo preferir que haya menos población? ¿por motivos económicos (que encima son mentira, son importantes para mantener intereses económicos de colectivos concretos, nada más)?

Pues es que a mí, que me digas que si no me cargo absolutamente la demografía española (y por tanto España), tengo no sé qué dificultad económica, me resulta como si me dices que si no abandono en el bosque a mi hijo pequeño, no me voy a poder comprar una moto.

¿qué psicopatía te hace pensar que me importa más comprar una moto que la integridad de mi familia? Pues así me suenan los argumentos económicos que "demuestran" que tenemos que aceptar destrozar España.

Me la suda lo más grande lo cierta o falsa que sea la premisa, la conclusión es estúpida y los datos improcedentes porque no entienden de qué va realmente la discusión. Si tú eres un apátrida o un traidor, estas cosas te dan igual. Del mismo modo que, como no es tu hijo y te dedicas a vender motos, lo de abandonar a mi hijo te parece aceptable, pero a mí no me lo va a parecer nunca por muchas gráficas que saques demostrando que me frustra la Ducati.

Si eres un absoluto midwit, seguirás sin entender que eso no es rechazo a los datos, sino comprensión de que los datos necesitan contexto y perspectiva para tener sentido.

[Ciriaco™ @Ciriaco_SPQR]

Todas las restricciones "anticipadas" (perseguir el tener un bate en lugar de perseguir las agresiones, prohibir comprar alcohol por la noche en lugar de controlar el orden en la vía pública...) revelan un Estado inoperante que por eso mismo se vuelve más tiránico.🧵

[Lily Bart @custardlake]

We are worried these men will rape, so let's give them an underclass of women it's acceptable to rape.

This is why they pretended the grooming gangs weren't happening, they thought working class girls were an acceptable group to absorb the violence.

[Juan Sánchez @JSanchezTorron]

Sí España fuese una potencia militar, Marruecos estaría ofreciendo pretextos sobrados para invadir el norte del país, militarizar la frontera y establecer un hinterland para proteger Ceuta y Melilla.
Pero como no lo es, encubre su impotencia con una ideología que sustituye lo político por lo humanitario.

[Ciriaco™ @Ciriaco_SPQR]

La prueba de que abortar es matar es que haya que abortar para que el niño no viva. Si no estuviese vivo, no haría falta hacer nada.
Antes de la concepción, si no haces nada, no hay niño. Porque no hay nada vivo. Después de la concepción tienes que hacer algo para que no viva porque está vivo.
Hacer algo para que alguien deje de estar vivo se llama matar.
Se pueden hacer todas las piruetas que se quiera, se le puede cambiar el nombre para disimular y hasta se puede estar a favor de matar por tal o cuál condicionante, pero que es matar es una obviedad ineludible.

[Robert W Malone, MD @RWMaloneMD]

Fauci funded the Wuhan research. Then he helped steer the intelligence that cleared it.
Gabbard's final act as DNI was to declassify the proof. And it confirms what a CIA whistleblower had already sworn to Congress weeks earlier.
What the documents actually show. 🧵

[Pablo Malo @pitiklinov]

Primer artículo que veo en prensa española acerca de este informe sobre los abusos sexuales a niñas en Reino Unido

Lo que cuenta este informe de Rupert Lowe coincide con informes oficiales previos que nadie ha podido desmentir:
-El Jay Report (2014) sobre Rotherham: al menos 1.400 niñas explotadas sistemáticamente.
-El informe de Telford (2022): más de 1.000 víctimas en esa sola localidad.
-Casos documentados en Rochdale, Oxford, Oldham, Bradford y decenas de distritos más.

Todos ellos describen el mismo patrón: bandas organizadas (mayoritariamente de origen pakistaní), niñas vulnerables (muchas blancas británicas de clase trabajadora), violaciones grupales, tráfico, violencia extrema y, sobre todo, el encubrimiento institucional por miedo a “parecer racistas”.

Aunque la cifra real fuera “solo” 100.000 casos (o incluso menos), seguiría siendo uno de los mayores escándalos de abuso sexual infantil en la historia de la Europa moderna en tiempos de paz. Miles de niñas destrozadas durante décadas mientras la policía, los servicios sociales y los políticos miraban para otro lado.

Creo que el debate sobre el número exacto o sobre el autor de este último informe no debería servir para minimizar lo monstruoso del fondo. El miedo a "dar munición a la derecha" es exactamente lo que permitió que esto durara décadas. Ese fue el problema original. Eso es lo que hay que reconocer y corregir, venga de quien venga el informe que lo pone encima de la mesa.

https://t.co/lF5Rcoaczx

[Izzy @izzygirl86]

Un error judicial no. El contribuyente español va a pagar 2,5 millones por la maldad, soberbia, incompetencia y prevaricación manifiesta de Margarita Robles.

[Chief Egregore Officer @ChiefEgregore]

I have now read the Rape Gang Inquiry Report in full.

I've been following this story quite closely for something like a decade so I'm not exactly surprised by its contents, but three elements stand out to me amongst the horror.

The first is that a large majority of the victims who provided testimony describe some kind of troubled or disrupted home life. Some were molested by family members before the rape gangs ever got ahold of them. Others faced physical abuse, neglect, drug addicted parents, housing instability, and so on.

Their testimony often describes a kind of "screening" process where a girl's particular vulnerability was evaluated with more moderate boundary pushing before escalation to full on rape and abuse.

This isn't necessarily surprising given the nefarious intentions the gangs had for these girls, but their willingness to explicitly target the absolute most vulnerable children who were already struggling sickens me. These girls, more than anyone, needed some kind of adult guidance in their lives, and this vulnerability was cynically exploited to initiate them into an even more egregious Hell.

Which brings me to the second detail, which is the extreme violence these girls were subjected to. "Grooming Gang" is an unacceptable euphemism that may accurately describe common initiatory tactics employed against these girls, but which criminally downplays the behavior of their abusers once initiated.

These girls were not "merely" groomed into sex. They were not "merely" raped. They were not "merely" trafficked. They were subjected to a program of overtly racialized sexual torture and humiliation designed to maximally degrade them and kill them in their souls. And this was "acceptable" because they were White and not Muslims.

This detail fundamentally alters the character of these crimes. This was not horny men out of control or even cross-cultural understanding gaps around the age of consent. This was a targeted program of ritualized torture and subjugation as a means of ethnic domination. In other words, these gangs are conducting war against the White British using serial child rape and torture as a form of conquest.

These are not crimes in the conventional sense. These are war crimes being conducted by one civilization against another, and they need to be treated as such.

And finally, the third point (encapsulated in the excerpt below) is that every single level of the state utterly failed these girls in the most egregious and unfathomable ways imaginable.

It's one thing when you have no physical evidence and are confronted with a "he said / she said" situation with respect to a rape allegation. It's another thing entirely when you have a pre-teen frequent flier at the NHS back again for her Nth sexually transmitted disease treatment, a 13 year old with broken glass shards embedded in her vagina, or a pregnant 13 year old.

These are cases with obvious alarming physical evidence that no one addressed in any meaningful way.

Politicians (Labour in particular) covered it up and suppressed action into investigations in order to maintain the Islamic bloc vote.

Police suppressed investigations, dismissed accusations and evidence, intimidated victims into silence, arrested victims for the crimes of their abusers, dismissed proven cases of rape with impotent warning letters, and in some cases directly raped the girls themselves.

Care homes disregarded obvious signs of abuse (including outright confessions), and enabled their abusers to maintain consistent access to the girls, in some cases acting more like pimps than caregivers.

Social workers addressed victims' needs so incompetently they recommended victims audition for a TV show role about being a child prostitute because it was "relatable" and even attended a victim's coerced sham marriage to her abuser.

NHS staff consistently failed to do anything in the face of overt medical evidence of obvious, undeniable sex crimes against these girls, treating the acute problem and sending them on their way with no protection whatsoever.

And teachers, much like the social workers, routinely delivered their students into the predatory arms of their abusers as they waited outside the schools, and utterly failed to appropriately address signs or confessions of abuse.

Virtually every arm of the state is directly complicit in exacerbating the abuse. Not one single institution at any level reliably offered protection or recourse to these girls.

As far as I am concerned I Restore government would be entirely justified in firing every single person in the employ of the state. If they are not a documented whistleblower they are complicit and thus compromised, and none of them have any business retaining their roles or their pensions. On the contrary large numbers of state officials deserve severe penalties for criminal negligence or outright complicity in these crimes.

Justice for these crimes will necessarily take place at a scale that will shock the pacified sensibilities of the over-socialized Liberal West, but nothing short of a biblical level reckoning will be sufficient to qualify as justice in this case.

@RupertLowe10 is not wrong to draw comparisons to the Holocaust. It is the only appropriate frame of reference in the popular zeitgeist that articulates the actual magnitude of what was allowed to take place under successive British governments. Nor is he wrong to propose the reinstatement of the death penalty as the appropriate restitution for these crimes.

The rapists and state officials who enabled this atrocity both deserve to hang. And I pray that the British public will entrust Rupert with the power to deliver justice long overdo.

In any case I am deeply appreciative of his efforts to bring this to light. He is the hero Britain needs right now.

Vote Restore. Deliver these girls justice.

[Remix News & Views @RMXnews]

🇳🇱🔴 "It wasn't a German man. It was an Iraqi who had applied for asylum in Germany."

14-year-old girl Tamar from the Dutch city of Marken was hit and killed by an Iraqi driver while she was walking on a road in July 2020.

Here is her mother telling Dutch media that the police lied to her and told her the suspect was a "German" because they did not want the case to support right-wing politician @geertwilderspvv.

The prosecution even dropped the case. For political reasons? The family will never know, but the Iraqi, Jamal T., is finally being brought to court and tried after her parents fought for years for his prosecution.

In fact, it was discovered that all four men in the car had an Iraqi background.

When she learned this information, she told Dutch media that the police responded that they had withheld the real background “because we didn’t want to create a Wilders-effect.” She described this as a “second blow” after losing her child, emphasizing that they should have been honest rather than offering “political excuses.”

The driver did not just flee the scene in Zeedijk, but evidence suggests that her body was moved at the scene of the accident. He claimed, however, that he never noticed hitting the girl, saying he thought he hit “something” but did not know it was a human. Nevertheless, Tamar was hit so hard by the impact that the coroner said she died instantly.

Despite driving away from the scene of the girl’s death, he was given only a €1,500 fine for looking at his phone while driving. However, he was not even delivered the fine, as he disappeared and the fine was “undeliverable” for years.

The family finally took matters into their own hands. They filed an Article 12 procedure, a legal mechanism allowing citizens to challenge a prosecutor’s refusal to take a case to trial. Now, finally, after six years, the 33-year-old Iraqi is being prosecuted for the fatal accident and fleeing the scene.

Police and prosecutors lied to the entire family for “political reasons” to hide the identity of the killer, according to the mother. Then, the family had to take matters into their own hands to force the case to trial.

The European legal system at work.

[Reasonable Blackman Jacobson @AudioJal123]

la que han pillado los dinosaurios con el absentismo (que solo es un problema real, politico y solucionable en EH) con tal de no señalar el modelo de baja productividad, bajos salarios e importacion de mano de obra barata y poco cualificada

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

The Rape Gang Inquiry Report.

https://t.co/EuKgGWBRhS

[Paul Embery @PaulEmbery]

Here’s the problem. The liberal political class wants us to treat atrocities like Belfast as single, random, isolated incidents. “Yes, it’s horrific, but don’t overreact,” they say. “Let the police do their job. Justice will be delivered. Let’s remain united,” and so on.

But the public can see that such incidents *aren’t* random or isolated. They are, in fact, all the consequence of massive state failure in the area of asylum and immigration. All roads lead back there.

That’s why people are angry.. They are sick of the platitudes that get trotted out after each fresh incident. They don’t want to hear them anymore. They know that the decisions of establishment politicians have brought us to this current pass, and they don’t trust those same politicians to fix things, especially when some of them refuse to even recognise that the public’s anger is justified.

There has been a huge vibe shift in recent years. Imagine - God forbid - there were another 7/7. Does anyone think the public response would be anything like as restrained as it was then? We are in really dangerous territory.

The public don’t want flowers and candles and “Don’t let them divide us.” They want someone who says, “I recognise that the state has failed abjectly. We have allowed far too many people to settle in the country without knowing who they truly are. It has disrupted your communities. Your anger is justified. And I will do everything in my power to put things right.”

Any politician unwilling to articulate that message, fully and sincerely, is effectively sanctioning more years of growing social disharmony and discord. Things cannot heal until those in power recognise the extent of the problem and what it will take to fix it. And, on both counts, most of them don’t.

That’s why the next few years are going to be very, very turbulent.

[Ciriaco™ @Ciriaco_SPQR]

Todos los años hay movida y siempre la va a haber porque el sistema no tiene ni pies ni cabeza. Es flipante lo mucho que se queja la gente de los detalles y lo poco que se cuestiona el sistema en general.

[memetic_sisyphus @memeticsisyphus]

Politics is funny because so often the person speaking can’t express their actual feelings or beliefs and it leads to ridiculous moments like this.

Her primary concern is immigrants. She genuinely wants to help them. In this case it’s directly at the cost of the native population. There’s just a competing interest here. She can’t be honest about which side she’d rather help because a politician advocating against her constituents for the benefit of a foreign population has famously ended with a trip to the gallows.