Where exactly is all this new beef coming from?
The administration is moving to bring in 300,000 metric tons of additional beef, but the specific countries supplying that meat have not been identified.
At the same time, we’re watching thousands of wild horses being rounded up and sold for as little as $25.
I’m not saying these things are connected.
I’m asking why we’re not demanding full transparency about both.
If the plan is to change the American meat supply on this scale, Americans deserve to know where that meat is coming from, who is supplying it, and who stands to profit.
Simple question.
Where is the beef coming from?
Here’s the question nobody seems to want answered:
Where exactly is all this new beef coming from?
The administration is moving to bring in 300,000 metric tons of additional beef, but the specific countries supplying that meat have not been identified.
At the same time, we’re watching thousands of wild horses being rounded up and sold for as little as $25.
I’m not saying these things are connected.
I’m asking why we’re not demanding full transparency about both.
If the plan is to change the American meat supply on this scale, Americans deserve to know where that meat is coming from, who is supplying it, and who stands to profit.
Simple question.
Where is the beef coming from?
Where exactly is all this new beef coming from?
The administration is moving to bring in 300,000 metric tons of additional beef, but the specific countries supplying that meat have not been identified.
At the same time, we’re watching thousands of wild horses being rounded up and sold for as little as $25.
I’m not saying these things are connected.
I’m asking why we’re not demanding full transparency about both.
If the plan is to change the American meat supply on this scale, Americans deserve to know where that meat is coming from, who is supplying it, and who stands to profit.
Simple question.
Where is the beef coming from?
Here’s the question nobody seems to want answered:
Where exactly is all this new beef coming from?
The administration is moving to bring in 300,000 metric tons of additional beef, but the specific countries supplying that meat have not been identified.
At the same time, we’re watching thousands of wild horses being rounded up and sold for as little as $25.
I’m not saying these things are connected.
I’m asking why we’re not demanding full transparency about both.
If the plan is to change the American meat supply on this scale, Americans deserve to know where that meat is coming from, who is supplying it, and who stands to profit.
Simple question.
Where is the beef coming from?
Here’s the question nobody seems to want answered:
Where exactly is all this new beef coming from?
The administration is moving to bring in 300,000 metric tons of additional beef, but the specific countries supplying that meat have not been identified.
At the same time, we’re watching thousands of wild horses being rounded up and sold for as little as $25.
I’m not saying these things are connected.
I’m asking why we’re not demanding full transparency about both.
If the plan is to change the American meat supply on this scale, Americans deserve to know where that meat is coming from, who is supplying it, and who stands to profit.
Simple question.
Where is the beef coming from?
@HealthRanger If Data Centers are taking all the land and water where will this Great Herd be? Oh right, National Forests. Please don't eat the beef after reports he just sold thousands our wild horses for 25$ each to countries who are obviously sending it back as burger.
This is exactly the kind of thing voters were warned about.
Trump campaigned on America First, protecting American workers, putting American interests ahead of foreign interests, and standing behind the people who produce our food.
Now we’re told the answer to high beef prices is to bring in up to 300,000 metric tons of foreign beef tariff-free and require it to be sold 25% below current market prices.
That may sound great if you’re standing in the grocery store looking at the price of hamburger.
But if you’re the American rancher who has to compete against that cheaper imported product, it’s a very different story.
You were told your vote would put American producers first.
So explain this one.
Because “America First” gets pretty damn hollow when the American rancher is expected to compete with cheaper foreign beef brought in to drive prices down.
At some point, voters have to stop listening to the slogan and start looking at what the policy actually does.
“Best boss and President ever.” 🤡
Nothing says independent public servant quite like publicly worshipping your boss while Americans are demanding transparency about the Epstein files and asking legitimate questions about what the government knows.
If your instinct is to praise the boss instead of demanding answers, you're not serving the public—you’re serving the boss.
And calling him “the best ever” while serious questions about Epstein remain unanswered isn't patriotism. It’s sycophancy on fucking steroids.
The presidency isn't a fan club. Karoline Leavitt is supposed to answer questions, not audition for employee of the month....
This is fucking pathetic. The President of the United States is supposed to lead a country, not spend his time rage-posting like an insecure bully who just got his feelings hurt.
“LOSERS ALL” is not an argument. “A pocketful of change” is not leadership. It’s playground shit from a man sitting in the most powerful office in the country.
And the irony is almost too perfect: he constantly demands loyalty, then publicly humiliates anyone who steps outside his little circle of approval. That isn’t strength. That’s insecurity with a microphone.
You can hate Tucker Carlson. You can disagree with MTG. You can think Thomas Massie is completely wrong. None of that changes what we’re watching here.
A president who cannot tolerate dissent without resorting to childish insults isn't projecting strength. He's exposing how fragile his ego is.
The fucking President of the United States shouldn't look like an angry old man fighting with strangers on social media. He should look like a president.
This is beneath the office. And honestly, it's embarrassing as hell.
@elonmusk The greatest privilege for me is simply getting to experience life: loving people, making memories, learning, changing, and having another day to do something that matters.
@elonmusk Elon, if Rome fell because Romans stopped making Romans, I guess the 1,000 years of wars, plagues, civil wars, political chaos and invasions were just Rome’s way of saying “nope, never mind.” 😂
That’s exactly the problem. You can’t just say “there is no theory” and pretend that settles it. If the lawn was part of the potential evidence and was later redone, then any evidence that may have been there is gone. Nobody is saying fragmentation definitely didn't happen. The question is whether the scene was altered before every reasonable possibility could be ruled out. That’s a legitimate question.
Whew you are special, huh. Why the fuck do you think I have to identify the person? 😂 YOU’RE the one claiming it’s Tyler. I’m saying your blurry, edited video doesn’t establish that. “Then who is it?” is not evidence. I don’t need to identify a person I can’t identify to point out that YOU haven’t identified them either. That’s literally how burden of proof works.