Hello @abhijeet_dipke
You are a national security threat, as you were in Turkey for a full month for the training.
You told everyone that you were in the USA, but you were getting training in Turkey.
Was it under the Turkish Intelligence Agency, MIT?
You have to answer this.
In Andhra Pradesh, a family of four from Kakinada went to a bridge in Rajamahendravaram over the Godavari river.
Panchayat Raj Assistant Engineer Nookaraju, his wife Meena, their daughter Sowjanya, and Sowjanya’s 10-year-old son Reyansh reportedly jumped into the river.
The child Reyansh survived. He was rescued by fishermen. But Nookaraju, Meena, and Sowjanya died.
At first, the case appeared to be a devastating family suicide.
Then investigators found two suicide notes. One was written by Nookaraju, and the other was written by Sowjanya.
Both reportedly named the same person: Sheikh Sadiq Khan, a rifle-shooting coach.
Sowjanya in her suicide note accused Sadiq Khan of prolonged harassment, threats, blackmail, and financial extortion. She claimed that private photographs/videos were being used to threaten her.
Sowjanya alleged that Sadiq repeatedly pressured her to convert to Islam.
Sowjanya also accused Sadiq Khan of being responsible for the death of her husband, who had died earlier. She claimed that her husband had been given a poisonous substance and that his death had been made to look like a suicide.
And, Nookaraju in his suicide note said that after the death of his son-in-law, Sadiq Khan entered his widowed daughter's life by offering to help her. He then began threatening and harassing the family.
Sowjanya’s 10-year-old son Reyansh who survived, told the police that Sadiq began visiting their house frequently and that he would often physically assault his mother and demand gold and money from her.
After their deaths, Sadiq Khan reportedly went missing from Andhra Pradesh.
After a search spanning five states, Sadiq Khan was traced to Meerut, where he was arrested with assistance of the UP police.
Three lives were lost, and a 10-year-old boy was left behind to face a future without his mother, grandparents, or family. Justice must be served.
पहले मुझे लगा था कि फ़र्ज़ी वीडियो है लेकिन पता लगा कि नांदेड़ में कांग्रेस सांसद रवींद्र चव्हाण के नेतृत्व में पार्टी ने सचमुच “सनातन धर्म मुर्दाबाद” के नारे लगाए
राहुल गांधी के नेतृत्व में पूरी पार्टी पागल हो चुकी है
I think this woman is beautiful & what she wears is absolutely her choice. Just that this outfit is more appropriate for a sexy date rather than celebrating a sacred bond with one's brother. After all, you wouldn't wear this on Eid or while celebrating Christmas, would you? On Valentine's Day it would be fine. You see, context matters. Occasion matters. And somewhere we seem to have lost that nuance
#Giva advertisement featuring actress Kriti Sanon for Rakshabandhan is NOT a lingerie ad, for the uninitiated.
Yes, Kriti has a great body and looks lovely. But in this advertisement, she is dressed in a skimpy outfit while celebrating Rakshabandhan with her sibling and with Giva jewellery.
Perhaps Kriti doesn’t realise that Rakshabandhan is a deeply rooted religious and cultural tradition in India. Perhaps she doesn’t understand that dressing appropriately for the occasion is also part of respecting its cultural context.
And surely, Hindu festivals do not need to be sexualised to sell jewellery.
Kriti has plenty of other opportunities to showcase her body and glamour. A festival celebrating the sacred bond between siblings probably isn’t one of them.
@theskindoctor13@kritisanon दलाली और Abrahamic Faiths वालों से जितने पैसे मिले तो उतना ही कर पाई अगर और पैसे मिलते तो शायद नंगे भी फ़ोटो शूट करवा लेती!
Hello @kritisanon,
1. Don't play the woman card. You were not criticized for your gender, but for your choice of clothes in an ad. You are bringing gender into this to make it a women's issue and seek wider support from women and male feminists. It's not a gender issue. Even Ranveer Singh was criticized on Twitter for a nude photoshoot. He didn't play the gender card.
2. Personal choice stops where public commercialization begins. What you wear off-camera is entirely your prerogative. You've been in this business for years. Until now, nobody bothered you about your choice of clothes. You know why? Because nobody actually cares what you wear. The outrage here comes from a commercial choice: sexualizing a deeply sacred festival celebrated by millions. Context dictates appropriateness. If a male actor appeared bare-chested while portraying the brother in that exact scene, the public pushback would be identical. The issue is sacredness and context, not gender.
3. Claiming "clothes don't define culture" directly contradicts human history. Attire is a foundational visual language of every global tradition, you cannot wear a Kimono and call it Indian ethnic wear, nor can you strip a festival of its sacred aesthetic without altering its significance. If attire truly has zero bearing on cultural respect, then tomorrow is Eid. Can you wear that exact same outfit you wore in that ad and wish Eid Mubarak? You said clothes don't define the respect you have for culture in your heart. So do it and we'll take our criticism back.
Respecting a tradition means honoring its context, not commodifying it under the guise of fashion.
Why these people didn't file FIR against Chandra Shekhar Ravan, who abused openly to our hindu girls but when Ajeet Bharti spoken about Ravan's family then he immediately filed FIR against him under ST-SC Act.
Waah Re Hypocrite 🤡
Let's Stand With Ajeet Bharti.
#ReservationHataoAndolan