🚨 NEET STUDENT -
"I went to Jantar Mantar and asked the CJP leaders for the stage so that I could speak about the paper leak solution.
But I was denied and sent away 🤯
I was shocked to see that only political people were being given the stage"
Making history at the UN. 🇺🇳 BJP State Secretary @asuvathaman addresses the UNHRC in Geneva, delivering a powerful message:
• First to voice against forced religious conversions at the UN
• Hinduism is an ancient civilization, not just a religion
• Destruction of ancient cultures is tied to forced conversions
• The overlooked cultural dimensions of global warming.
Please share the number of your doctor who allows you to go to a party and dance during typhoid.
During Typhoid, your body uses a lot of energy to fight the infection.
- You eat less because of poor appetite.
- You lose fluids through fever and sometimes diarrhea.
- Your muscles don't get enough energy.
Because of this, people with typhoid often feel exhausted and need plenty of rest.
Now don't say you sacrificed your health, gathered all your courage, and went to a party for justice for the student who died by suicide.
புள்ளிவிவரம் பேசலாம். ஆனால் முழுப் புள்ளிவிவரத்தையும் பேசுவோம். 😊
ECI அதிகாரப்பூர்வ முடிவுகளின்படி தென்காசி மாவட்டத்தின் 5 தொகுதிகளையும் சேர்த்தால்:
DMK கூட்டணி — 3,34,313 ≈ 31.42%
NDA — 3,25,678 ≈ 30.61%
TVK — 2,69,719 ≈ 25.35%
முதலில் ஒரு correction: TVK 24% அல்ல — சுமார் 25.35%.
அடுத்து முக்கியமான விஷயம்:
“BJP/NDA 30.2%” என்று சொல்லும்போது, அந்த 30% முழுவதையும் BJP-யின் களப்பணி போல காட்டக்கூடாது.
5 தொகுதிகளில் BJP நேரடியாகப் போட்டியிட்டது ஒரே ஒரு தொகுதி — வாசுதேவநல்லூர்.
மற்ற 4 தொகுதிகளில் NDA-வின் பிரதான வேட்பாளர்கள் AIADMK.
அதிலும் 5 தொகுதிகளில் NDA வென்றது ஒரே ஒரு தொகுதி — சங்கரன்கோவில்; அதுவும் AIADMK.
DMK வென்றது 4/5 தொகுதிகள்.
நீங்கள் நேரடியாக BJP வேட்பாளராகப் போட்டியிட்ட வாசுதேவநல்லூரில்:
DMK — 63,045 (33.22%)
BJP — 56,462 (29.75%)
TVK — 45,862 (24.16%)
NOTA — 637 (0.34%)
BJP தோல்வி வித்தியாசம் — 6,583 வாக்குகள்.
அதனால் NOTA-வை வைத்து மற்றவர்களை “அசிங்கப்படுத்துவதற்கு” முன்பு ஒரு சின்ன கேள்வி:
AIADMK போட்டியிட்ட 4 தொகுதிகளின் வாக்குகளையும் சேர்த்து “BJP/NDA 30%” என்று credit எடுத்துக்கொள்வது எந்த கணக்கில்? 😄
X-ல் யார் கம்பு சுற்றுகிறார்கள் என்பதை விட, ECI data-வில் யார் போட்டியிட்டார்கள், யார் வென்றார்கள், யார் தோற்றார்கள் என்பதுதான் இன்னும் தெளிவாக இருக்கிறது.
5-ல் BJP போட்டியிட்டது 1.
BJP வென்றது 0.
NDA வென்றது 1.
DMK வென்றது 4.
NOTA புள்ளிவிவரமும் வேண்டுமென்றால் பேசலாம். 😉
@YuvarajPollachi My father was BJP district treasurer during 1980 s . When Advani ji came he stayed in kamalayam. If you have doubt ask @imkarjunsampath sir how bjp was during 1980 . Why arjun sir left BJP and started a separate organisation
@YuvarajPollachi Did you check my profile from when I am in twitter. And my family and it's relation with BJP my followers list is small but me and my family standing with BJP started from my dads Time. I also have seen all this through bro so don't teach about time line to me.
Oppanakara Street being narrow does NOT establish that a Metro alignment is technically impossible.
In fact, the Union Government’s own reply in Parliament says the issue is that “at several locations” there is insufficient Right of Way (RoW) for constructing stations. It does not say the entire Coimbatore alignment is technically impossible.
For a congested core such as Town Hall/Oppanakara Street, there are engineering alternatives: an elevated alignment where sufficient RoW is available, an underground section through the constrained core, or locating stations at wider junctions/nearby roads rather than placing a full station box on the narrowest stretch.
There is already precedent for major elevated infrastructure in this very area—the Ukkadam flyover planning itself included links towards Oppanakara Street/Town Hall.
And where exactly is the rule saying every road along a Metro corridor must have a stipulated 20-metre width before MoHUA can approve the project? MoHUA's own standards state that for elevated Metro construction in the middle of a road, about 9 metres minimum is required during piling/open-foundation construction.
So the correct question is not:
“Is Oppanakara Street wide enough for a conventional elevated Metro station?”
The question is:
“What alignment and station configuration can connect the Town Hall/Ukkadam commercial core while avoiding the narrowest RoW constraints?”
That is precisely what DPR-level engineering and alternatives analysis are supposed to determine.
A narrow road can justify changing the alignment, shifting a station or going underground. By itself, it does not prove that Metro connectivity to the area is impossible.
Why this selective outrage sarrr? @SauravDassss If you raise the issue of the Education Ministers resignations in Punjab and Karnataka, I’ll be right there supporting you in that But do you really have the guts to go against your own Aam Aadmi Party? 🧐
On #KargilVijayDiwas, we remember the courage, grit and selflessness of the soldiers who fought under impossible circumstances. Their sacrifice reminds us that our nation's strength rests on the resolve of those who protect it.
Jai Hind.
@YuvarajPollachi மோடி ஒரு மத கலவர கொலைகாரன் அமெரிக்கவுல நுழையகூடாதுனு ஒபாமாவுக்கு July 2013ல கையெழுத்து போட்டு அனுப்புன எம்பி ல ஒருத்தன் யார் தெரியுமா?
உங்க மாவட்ட தலைவர் கே. பி. ராமலிங்கம்.
உங்களுக்கெல்லாம் கொள்கையாவது சாக்கடையாவது 😂😮💨🤮
Continuation — 2/2
Now about the old tweets/comments.
Please bring every one of them.
Seriously.
Every tweet. Every interview. Every Perumal Murugan statement. Every statement from his IPS days.
No objection whatsoever.
But apply the SAME standard to his later positions too.
If a person held opinion A before entering active politics, later explains why he moved to B, and years later differs with his party over strategy C, the existence of A, B and C doesn't automatically prove “ideological chameleon”.
You have to establish that those changes happened purely for personal benefit.
Otherwise Indian political history itself will have to be renamed “Chameleon History.” 😄
And the most amusing accusation is:
“Modi made Annamalai visible.”
Absolutely.
And?
Political parties identify people, give them opportunities and expect them to build the organisation.
That is precisely what leadership is supposed to do.
Does acknowledging an organisation's contribution mean an individual loses his right to disagree with that organisation for the rest of his life?
Then we're not discussing political ideology.
We're discussing lifetime ownership.
My support for Annamalai doesn't require me to insult Modi ji.
And respecting Modi ji doesn't require me to pretend Annamalai became irrelevant the moment he left BJP.
Modi's stature doesn't become smaller because Annamalai left BJP.
Annamalai's contribution doesn't disappear because BJP gave him the opportunity.
Both statements can coexist.
Finally, you asked Annamalai to tell people openly:
“முன்னாடி நான் இப்படி இருந்தேன், BJP-க்கு வந்த பிறகு இப்படி மாறினேன், இப்போ வேறொரு political journey ஆரம்பிக்கிறேன்.”
On this point, I actually agree.
Let him explain EVERYTHING.
Old positions. BJP journey. Modi relationship. Political disagreements. Why he left. Why he started WTL. What ideology he stands for TODAY.
Let him be questioned publicly.
But after that, let the SAME ethical standard apply to everybody.
Because:
“Annamalai owes BJP gratitude” — FAIR.
“Therefore Annamalai owes BJP permanent political obedience” — NOT FAIR.
One is gratitude.
The other is ownership.
And leaders aren't owned.
History will decide whether Annamalai's decision was courage, political miscalculation or failure.
Until then...
Criticise him with facts.
Question his contradictions.
Challenge his politics.
But “கோடாரி காம்பு”, “பச்சோந்தி”, “Modi backstabber” எல்லாம் நல்ல punch dialogue தான்.
Punch dialogue ≠ Evidence.
And if his new journey fails, he owns that failure.
If it succeeds?
Well... அப்போ அந்த history-யும் அவருக்கே சொந்தம். 😉🔥