WAICK

[我是梦嫣❤️ @mengyan1234567]

知小礼，无大义！

日本人那么爱表演鞠躬道歉，可在对那些侵略恶行时却鲜有鞠躬道歉的！

它们还是懂得权衡利弊的，鸡毛蒜皮的小事它们喜欢鞠躬道歉，大是大非上一直装聋作哑 ​​​😡

[China Science @ChinaScience]

Chinese researchers have for the first time confirmed the existence of the glueball, an entirely new form of matter, according to the Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) under the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). This finding comes after 15 years of experimental research.
This is the clearest experimental result in the search for glueballs over nearly five decades, researchers said, adding that it verifies the theoretical prediction that gluons can bind with one another to form a new type of matter, and is of great significance for testing the standard model of particle physics.

[Chris M @ChrisinLiuzhou]

What has the Chinese government done for its people?

I'll shut up and let the stats talk.

Stat | 2000 | 2025

Life expectancy 71.4 78.6
Absolute poverty 66% 0%
Nominal GDP $1.22T $19.6T
Higher education 12.5% 61.3%
Highway length 16k km 199k km
Metro network 110 km 11,700 km
Internet users 22.5M 1.12B
Industrial robots 3,000 2.0M+
Annual deliveries 0.2B 216.5B
Solar capacity 0.02 GW 1100 GW

--

Have a nice day.

[𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦 @OopsGuess]

CNBC described China’s open-source AI as “pushing the U.S. to compete at the lower end of the value chain,” initially trying to save face for Silicon Valley.

The comments section immediately tore that framing apart:

"Chinese models are approaching frontier-level capability while remaining absurdly cheap."

"This is not the 'lower end' of the value chain."

It is forcing expensive American models to answer a much uglier question:

Why are you charging tens or even hundreds of times more for the same work?

The most revealing part was that people saw through the euphemism immediately:

“Lower end” is just cope.

American labs are not protecting the high end.
They are protecting high profit margins.

China’s open-source models are turning frontier capability into a commodity, crushing prices, and freeing developers from brand worship.

Suddenly, the American myth of closed-source superiority, premium pricing, and inflated valuations looks less like technological leadership—

and more like an ordinary handbag with a luxury label.

[𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦 @OopsGuess]

Rubio’s entire statement can be translated into one paragraph:

America preached free markets when it was winning.
Now that China is succeeding under the rules Washington claimed to worship, competition becomes “Chinese aggression,” industrial policy becomes “cheating,” and American decline becomes someone else’s crime.

China never showed much interest in becoming the world’s policeman. It would much rather let the United States stand in front, absorb the anger, finance the wars, patrol the oceans, and exhaust itself—while China develops, trades, builds, and moves forward.

Washington’s real problem is not that China wants to replace it.
It is that America cannot tolerate any country becoming strong enough to ignore its permission.

The Soviet Union.
Germany.
Japan.
The European Union.

Whenever another power rises, American paranoia activates.
It does not compete.
It sanctions.
Blocks.
Threatens.
Cuts access.
Weaponizes finance.
Then calls the damage “defending the rules-based order.”

But China is the opponent Washington was never psychologically prepared for.

The more it is contained, the more it substitutes.
The more it is sanctioned, the more it builds.
The more it is denied, the more it learns to live without America.

The United States has no memory of rebuilding from national ruin.

China does.

That is why Washington experiences setbacks as humiliation, while China experiences them as instructions.

And Rubio’s Taiwan remarks expose the fraud behind Washington’s language of “stability.”

The United States says it opposes any change to the status quo—not because the status quo is sacred, but because permanent division serves American power.

China is expected to tolerate separatism, foreign arms, political interference, and an island turned into a strategic pressure point indefinitely.

Washington calls that “peace.”
But any attempt by China to end the arrangement becomes “coercion.”

So Rubio’s message is simple:

We lost the free-market competition we claimed to believe in.
China kept advancing despite our attempts to stop it.
Direct confrontation is becoming too dangerous.
But we still intend to preserve every geopolitical advantage created by Chinese division.

America is not asking for stability because it has accepted China.
It is asking for a strategic pause while keeping Taiwan frozen as leverage.

Containment failed.
The appetite for containment did not.

[楚狂 @chukuang2018]

1994年，菲律宾官方承认黄岩岛不属于菲律宾的信函。

[WAICK @WAICK2U]

@duck35777299 @dw_chinese 那新加坡又是什麼民主？告提出問題的人上法庭令他破產或入獄？

[𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦 @OopsGuess]

This article is absurd.

Apparently the problem is that China makes products too cheap, too useful, and too competitive.

What should China do instead?

Produce worse goods at higher prices so Western bureaucrats can feel emotionally safe?

Consumers choose Chinese EVs because they offer better value. Nobody is holding a gun to Europe’s head and forcing people to buy them.

Orders come first.
Production follows.

That is called demand.

The West loved “free markets” when its companies were winning, outsourcing, extracting profits, and selling overpriced goods to everyone else.

Now China wins on technology, price, scale, and supply chains — suddenly it becomes an “imbalance.”

This is not China defying history or logic, but it is the West discovering that history no longer bends around its comfort.

They do not want “balance.
They want China to slow down so your overpriced, undercompetitive, bureaucratic industrial museums can survive without learning how to compete.

And invoking 2008 is hilarious.

America nearly collapsed the global economy with financial fraud, Wall Street bubbles, and paper wealth.

China built real factories, real infrastructure, real production capacity — then used real industrial wealth to help stabilize the system.

The West sells bubbles and calls it sophistication.

China builds goods people actually buy and gets accused of being dangerous.

Very normal empire logic.

[Mao Ning 毛宁 @SpoxCHN_MaoNing]

In east China’s Anhui, the water glimmers like polished emeralds, crystal clear. Bamboo rafts drift gently, as if floating on air.

[𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦 @OopsGuess]

China has taken aim at Australia without even naming it, condemning its blatant interference and its role in stoking tensions in the South China Sea.

Translation:

Australia is desperate to play regional troublemaker.

And it is the least qualified country on earth to cosplay as a moral preacher.

A settler-colonial state built on stolen Indigenous land, British convict settlement, massacres, and the erasure of native sovereignty has no moral authority to lecture China about territory.

One stole a continent.
One was sold by Spain to America for $20 million.

Now both lecture China about “rules.”

Go answer to the Indigenous people whose land you still occupy before opening your mouth about Chinese territory.

Ren’ai Jiao is Chinese territory.

Australia has no seat at this table.

[𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦 @OopsGuess]

You can buy a Tesla in China.
Can Americans buy BYD in the U.S.?

No.

So spare me the “China blocks everything” clown show.

As for Google, maybe ask why it left China.

China did not force Google to separate from its American parent company.
China did not forcibly acquire Google.
Google chose to leave after deciding it would rather play State Department diplomacy than obey Chinese law.

Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Google were openly discussed as tools of U.S. diplomacy.

Then these American clowns act shocked that China did not hand its information space to Washington on a silver plate.

This was never about “free market.”
It was about America demanding access to China while denying Chinese companies access to America.

Very normal empire hypocrisy.

[Natie🇨🇳 @Natie2Natie]

Saw this video that absolutely slays. 💥
Next time someone says ‘China copies everything,’ just remind them — where do you think your fork, compass, paper, and even ketchup came from?
Respect copyright? Then pay up. 😏
Full credit 🎙️ Lana Mo — this one’s gold.

[sarah @sahouraxo]

Trump dropped bombs on a desalination plant in Iran’s Hormozgan province — cutting off water to 10,000 cilivians across 20 villages.

This is not a military target.

Trump is deliberately bombing critical infrastructure civilians need to stay alive.

[Daniel Mayakovski @DaniMayakovski]

"Cuando entramos en las prisiones de Israel, los prisioneros palestinos se orinan en sus pantalones al vernos, se orinan del miedo. Entramos en la celda de Marwan Barghouti y estaba llorando aterrorizado. Les dije a los carceleros que continuaran tratándoles así".

Ben Gvir, el psicópata nazi que controla la policía de "Israel", se vanaglorió hoy de las torturas a las que someten a los palestinos en sus campos de concentración, diciendo orgulloso que los palestinos están tan aterrorizados que se orinan encima y lloran solo al verles.

Esto es tranquilamente lo que diría un miembro de las SS el siglo pasado al ver a los prisioneros de sus campos de exterminio, es pura maldad, este genocida disfruta con el sufrimiento ajeno.

[我是梦嫣❤️ @mengyan1234567]

美国：过去和现在

你认为的那个美国，已经不复存在😲

[DaiWW @BeijingDai]

Recently, Chinese technology has been catching Americans off guard time and again. First, videos of China's rocket recovery went viral all over social media. Now, Chinese AI models are matching the performance of American counterparts that cost ten times as much to develop—shattering the illusion that the U.S. has a ten-month lead over China in AI. And on top of that, China's models are open-source.

The Western narrative has always been that China doesn't innovate, that it simply demands technology transfers from Western companies or steal from the west. But from what I understand, every single piece of Western technology that has been transferred to China was outdated, non-core, or incomplete—and China paid a heavy price for it, whether in market access or in cash. China's technological edge today is, in fact, the result of its own R&D efforts. Actually, no country can achieve real development by relying on external technology transfers. Nobody gives you the real stuff.

[𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦 @OopsGuess]

CIA Director John Ratcliffe called China “our greatest threat.”

But this is not really about a “China threat.”

It is about American decline meeting a civilization it cannot break.

China has spent decades trying to surpass its own previous stage:
build better industry, better infrastructure, better science, better education, better technology.

America has spent decades trying to prevent others from catching up.

It sanctioned the Soviet Union.
It disciplined Germany.
It crushed Japan’s rise.
It bends Europe into strategic obedience.
It blocks, bans, tariffs, blacklists, and weaponizes every system it controls.

So when Washington says China is a threat, what it really means is:

China is the first rival we cannot easily destroy.

That is the wound.

America grew up believing history ended with itself.
That it was the final empire.
The permanent winner.
The author of rules.
The judge of legitimacy.
The only power allowed to rise without permission.

Yet America has no civilizational memory of humiliation.

It was not colonized.
It was not carved up by foreign powers.
It was not burned, invaded, occupied, sanctioned into weakness, and forced to rebuild from national trauma.

China was.

China understands rise and fall.
Dynasties. Collapse. Humiliation. Revival.
The long rhythm of history.

America understands victory.

So when it finally faces a civilization that grows stronger under pressure, it panics.

Not because China wants to destroy America.
But because America knows what it has done to every weaker country it could dominate.

And now it is terrified by one question:

If we lose our monopoly, will China treat us the way we treated the world?

[James Wood 武杰士 @commiepommie]

🇨🇳 Three child rapists were executed in China the same day. No hiding it.

China’s Supreme People’s Court approved the death sentences and they were carried out together. All three men had raped children.

The court made the cases public with one clear message: no mercy for anyone who harms a child.

This is straight from Chinese media:

One offender names Zhao ran an illegal education business where he and others abused dozens of underage students. He alone repeatedly raped eight girls, three under 14. Wang and Chen had their own records of targeting the vulnerable over years. The system didn’t drag its feet or offer endless appeals. Justice was swift and final.

The CPC has zero tolerance for crimes against children and there’s no room for debate. It is protecting the future of families and society in the most direct way possible. These executions send a strong signal: prey on the innocent and the state will end you.

Western media goes on about human rights and how no state should kill. The same voices often watch their own systems cycle predators through soft sentences while victims and communities suffer.

China chooses different and prioritises the safety of its children over performative compassion for monsters.

The difference between China and the West is clear. In China the focus stays on deterrence and real consequences for the worst offences. Publicising these cases reinforces the bottom line. Harm kids and there will be no quiet deals or second chances.

This is not new. Beijing has done it before and will do it again when the crimes demand it. It is rooted in practical reality: a stable society protects its most vulnerable first.

When a country refuses to hide its toughness on child abusers and delivers results, is that backward or is it basic responsibility to its people?

China has made its choice clear.

[Michelle @D162Michele]

Why does the West hate Muslims in its own countries but somehow love Muslims in China?