Thomas Walker

[Thomas Walker @walker_tho76566]

@steven18613 @ClintRegert @NotEvolution1 Have you lived for billions of years to conclusively say this?

[Thomas Walker @walker_tho76566]

@StandswithGod Eh, I would like to go to hell. A heaven full of sycophants is not gonna be a good time for me.

[Thomas Walker @walker_tho76566]

@luisdizon @ABCDcang @RevIsaacWirtz @HansFiene That he saw part of the truth, and confused it for the whole.

[Thomas Walker @walker_tho76566]

@steven18613 @ClintRegert @NotEvolution1 The key point is that earth was lucky. All luck. We should not exist, yet we do. It's just luck that we didn't need trillions of years to evolve.

[Thomas Walker @walker_tho76566]

@Whoopsotheclown @JacobAwsum @ClintRegert @NotEvolution1 It matters as we now know for certain that life can come from non-life. Some planet out there will have the same conditions as required, without a creator, so life will be born.

[Thomas Walker @walker_tho76566]

@JacobAwsum @ClintRegert @NotEvolution1 We have proof that life can come from non-life. There are trillions of planets in the universe. It's reasonable that, at least on one of them, the conditions created by the scientists will be met without a creator. It's a game of chances.

[Thomas Walker @walker_tho76566]

@ClintRegert @NotEvolution1 Not if you have like 7 billion years and trillions of planets. It's a game of chance. Since abiogenesis exist, it's reasonable that even without a God, the conditions to create life will be met, because the universe is just that vast.

[Thomas Walker @walker_tho76566]

@ClintRegert @NotEvolution1 Abiogenesis has been observed and replicated now. Spudcell, search it. It's fascinating.

[Thomas Walker @walker_tho76566]

@gimoxtweet Yudhisthir didn't abandon his dog, that's the key part.

[Thomas Walker @walker_tho76566]

@MartinTweats How do we disprove God though? You say he exists beyond reality, beyond creation etc. If it doesn't fall within the physical world, or affect it in someway, it's a forever hypothesis. We cannot proof or disprove something that's intentionally made to be beyond all classifications

[Thomas Walker @walker_tho76566]

@ttgeeker79464 @mrnew212 That's a sad thing actually; our own people sold themselves to serve your kind. Don't worry, we won't be making that mistake again ;)

[Thomas Walker @walker_tho76566]

@RevIsaacWirtz It's actually 2 separate deities as well; Yahweh for Christian, and El for Muslims.

[Thomas Walker @walker_tho76566]

@RevIsaacWirtz Difference is we treat that "something" as stuff that we can discover in due time, with research and trial and error. Religions think they already have the answer, and they say that with zero proofs.

[Thomas Walker @walker_tho76566]

@SaintEcclesia @CryptoESP_710 @Heavennbound Beyond even this atheist-theist debate, I hate that Luke line. It says humans are inherently less loving that God. I can accept being powerless inf front of God, but I like to believe that human compassion can be unfathomable as well.

[Thomas Walker @walker_tho76566]

@SaintEcclesia @CryptoESP_710 @Heavennbound Jesus is not proof of God. My criteria is a miracle (not a healing miracle, but a spontaneous, observable miracle, like Water into Wine) must occur, and be recorded, and tested, by scientists. It must be impossible to perform by humans, and must be tested rigorously.

[Thomas Walker @walker_tho76566]

@StandswithGod I mean, yeah, we don't. It's not evil, just a bit uncomfortable, and it is an animal's nature to seek the most comfort.

[Thomas Walker @walker_tho76566]

@SaintEcclesia @CryptoESP_710 @Heavennbound Then we are back at square one; we can't prove God, hence he is forever a hypothesis.

[Thomas Walker @walker_tho76566]

@SaintEcclesia @CryptoESP_710 @Heavennbound I hate the women's role based verses in Timothy and Corinthians. And that verse in Luke. 14:26, I think; basically a happy man cannot be his disciple.

[Thomas Walker @walker_tho76566]

@SaintEcclesia @CryptoESP_710 @Heavennbound You are still taking God as a fact. I repeat, he is a hypothesis. Why should I be obedient to a hypothesis? Your definition of sin is defined by disobedience to God. Its like you are God's servant. Why must I play servant to a hypothesis?

[Thomas Walker @walker_tho76566]

@GodlyAction *All of them are false gods. We are humans, we need no gods.