Partner, O'Melveny & Myers, Emeritus Professor Law, Duke University, Assistant Attorney General (OLC) 1993-1996, acting Solicitor General of the US 96-97
The UBER Super Bowl Ad is reprehensible. An entire ad of people eating or swallowing dangerous substances! At times a small line across the bottom: ‘prop food, do not drink liquid soap’. What are you thinking UBER!? Children, college students watching eating of diapers, etc?
Embattled British PM Boris Johnson has a new communications chief, who said on his first day on the job that the PM “is not a complete clown.” Wow. Let’s not go overboard defending the boss.
This is the ultimate Dook-UNC
Rivalry Clip. My son adds that no infants were taunted in the making of this video. She was already crying. #DUKEvsUNC#TarHeelNation#GoHeels
My son Drew claims credit for his son Israel’s inspiring poem about the Celtic #Imbolc. As Israel’s grandfather, however, I believe, the credit is all mine.
Breyer retires. I asked CJ Rehnquist in a public interview at Duke whether it was inappropriate for a Justice to taking into account the politics of the Pres when deciding when to retire: Of course not, he replied, ‘deciding when to retire is not a judicial act.
Yes, Change the Stupid Overtime Rule. BUT thank God we had it for THIS game: it meant that neither of these great QB’s had to “lose”the game w/ an inevitable mistake. Gods of Football could not bring themselves to disfavor either QB. So they let the coin decide.
When I saw this, I immediately knew what @nhannahjones did was important & newsworthy enough to generate stories... This one below just summarizes the tweets.
I need REAL STORIES. I need the video(?). I need quotes from people who were there, etc.
3)The filibuster in recent years — changing from virtually unlimited debate into what is functionally a 60 vote requirement for voting — if profoundly anti-Constitutional. If proposed at the Constitutional Convention it would have been emphatically rejected.
1)The recent requirement for the Senate of a supermajority of 60 votes to pass legislation is profoundly anti-Constitutional. The Constitution explicitly sets out every matter that requires a supermajority. For much of history, it took unanimous agreement to end Senate debate.
2)How, you might ask, if it took unanimous consent to vote, did anything ever get voted on? Answer: everyone understood that the rule was about allowing debate to fully explore issues. But all knew AT SOME POINT THERE HAD TO ME A SIMPLE MAJORITY VOTE.
Would it be an extraordinary step for the 1-6 Committee to question a VICE PRESIDENT? Not if you recall that the following submitted to questioning: Presidents Nixon (Watergate) Ford (Pardon of Nixon) Reagan (Iran Contra) Clinton (Whitewater) Clinton (Monica).
10) And, given that the last two cases were on an extremely foreshortened schedule, the Solicitor General was, as the baseball writers would say, pitching on short rest. The US was well served.
9)Regardless of the outcome, the OSHA case will be remembered for yet another spectacular oral argument by SG Elizabeth Prelogar. Her arguments in the Mississippi Abortion Case, the Texas Abortion Bounty Case and the OSHA Mandate Case are a trilogy of truly outstanding arguments