@Barbaneth@Draccus5@itsJeffTiedrich Literally everyone could see before the election that mail in ballots were going to be one sided because the GOP was demonizing them. Anyone paying attention knew a red mirage was likely.
@sin_danger@skjask Yeah, the Kens are as harmed by the patriarchy as the Barbies. Anyone who takes the reading of the movie only as the speech the mom gives and misses that is missing the point of the movie.
@PamelaParesky@skjask Yeah, anyone who is reading being told there is toxic masculinity as all masculinity is toxic is a victim of toxic masculinity. And the point of if they think they aren't men because they aren't masculine enough is exactly why we talk about toxic masculinity.
@JPaigeWWJ@kylegriffin1 The GOP Senate intelligence committee put out a report indicating there was serious smoke with the Russia Collusion investigation. Why y'all keep pushing this bullshit?
@warinutah @263phrogs @alexencandar @kylegriffin1 Exactly, the SCOTUS decision covered the HEROS act and if Congress was giving power to cancel debt as it wasn't EXACTLY specific above that. This act is specifically about cancelling debt.
@Horsed00d00@aznananc@howintheworld@MichaelArthur5@BretWeinstein Again, you're throwing out a whole lot of shit at everyone without actual proof. The emails don't actually prove corruption. The timeline for the accused corruption doesn't make sense. There isn't a there there man.
@Horsed00d00@aznananc@howintheworld@MichaelArthur5@BretWeinstein Point is you have no idea what's on the laptop other than some pictures and emails, you claim there's all this evidence proving the Bidens are corrupt but you, and all your ilk screaming for investigations, just assume there's proof and you have no clue.
@Horsed00d00@aznananc@howintheworld@MichaelArthur5@BretWeinstein You've got pictures, not the laptop. Some of the emails have been confirmed. Nothing actually proving anything, just some emails with vague meaning. The laptop is a ghost, at the very least because its chain of custody is horrible. If it's even real.
@jagsully@KAMasse81@robertjdenault@EdWhelanEPPC You're missing the point. There must be a case in controversy for a suit to be brought. It's very simple - there must be a party harmed. 303 was never harmed. Thus...no standing. SCOTUS never should have heard this case.