John Rawstron

[John Rawstron @Watcher372]

@BallotsandBlitz @Emzyl_ Yes, but he was nowhere near the ball so it wasnt Dogso so saying its the same thing isnt true. Lfc missed out on a pen and a red. Afc lost a pen. Nothings evened up for LFC in those decisions.

[John Rawstron @Watcher372]

@suaveman7 Zero ball knowledge

[John Rawstron @Watcher372]

@BallotsandBlitz @Emzyl_ Yet ppl say the havertz offside was a pen when he had approx 0% chance of getting to the ball whereas on the isak one hes mm away from it

[John Rawstron @Watcher372]

@AFC_Abdul1 @Liverpool171093 @ONE_AMN That was the madueke incident. The red would have been for timber DOGSO on isak.

[John Rawstron @Watcher372]

@ONE_AMN @are_you_el_kay How tf does that even it up for Liverpool. Its not even the same, timber/isak was also DOGSO. Should have been pen n red.

[John Rawstron @Watcher372]

@swin_j @Redsmail @DaleJohnsonBBC @JimmyMu35984013 If var isnt there to re referee games then why have it. First thing they should get rid of is clear and obvious. It gives var carte blanche to ignore anything.

[John Rawstron @Watcher372]

@JamesPearceLFC This is what i hate most about var. 4-1 say its a penalty yet 3-2 think var should intervene. Stupidest guidance ever. Var is there to re referee, all this nonsense that it isnt gives refs a much larger grey area than needs be. If it should be a penalty var should intervene

[John Rawstron @Watcher372]

@ismail0266 @Logicull In both. Wirtz sees space quicker than any1 in our team. Szobo cant see space even when its 15 yards in front of him and hes looking str8 at it. (See psg game last yr where he ignores the easiest line breaking passes u could wish for)

[John Rawstron @Watcher372]

@Logicull @ismail0266 He isnt. Wirtz has more vision in one of the hairs on his arse than szobo can even imagine.

[John Rawstron @Watcher372]

@LFC4evamli @hobidyhobs Shankly took over with us in the equivalent of the championship so your past or present claim is bollocks

[John Rawstron @Watcher372]

@CL9268 How many times do commentators and pundits have to tell ppl the threshold is much lower for an attacking foul b4 it sinks in. Thats the real mystery here.

[John Rawstron @Watcher372]

@MidlandScotsman @northvillan Textbook

[John Rawstron @Watcher372]

@AnfieldLounge This

[John Rawstron @Watcher372]

@Footballera0 Not like spurs n chelsea got to ucl finals in that period or anything is it

[John Rawstron @Watcher372]

@thatrexguy Id keep mamar, grav, kerkez and frimpong.

[John Rawstron @Watcher372]

@MidlandScotsman @northvillan Its irrelevant. Its a foul. The law was brought in precisely to make this a foul. We can argue all day about whether hed get there or not but thats not in the law so pointless.

[John Rawstron @Watcher372]

@leemarh7099 This is why we'll have another world war. Life is so easy and hardship free for so many that people spend their lives creating hardship and injustice where there is none. Only real suffering will cure this so at some point ww3 is inevitable.

[John Rawstron @Watcher372]

@JimmyMu35984013 I think he spent half of last season getting a group of players led by Mo to undermine Slot, backed it up himself in interviews to engineer a fast track back to the big time with an interim job. We were stuck with "toys out the pram" salah and no transfer fee cos of him

[John Rawstron @Watcher372]

@MidlandScotsman @northvillan How do u know, it changes his trajectory. The law changed, if someone impedes the gk with no attempt to play the ball its a foul. Whether he can get there or not doesnr matter. Personally I think its close and the nudge is enough to stop him getting fingertips to it

[John Rawstron @Watcher372]

@MidlandScotsman @northvillan You can literally see the goalkeeper move in the air when lammens knocks him. he impedes the gk with no attempt to play the ball. Textbook foul. If u hit something when its in the air it moves. Stop gaslighting.