@pmddomingos@WuWei113 Please don't be cryptic. Your advice will influence a lot of young people. If you make what you, among all people, know will be perceived as controversial career advice, you owe those young people your reasoning.
@pmddomingos Erasmus Darwin -> Conceives the what, but not the how.
Charles Darwin -> Conceives and formalizes the how.
Faraday -> Conceives the what, but not the how.
Maxwell -> Conceives and formalizes the how.
So if F > M, is not also E > D?
@elonmusk@Dr_Singularity Roger Penrose would not categorize the premise that understanding is outside of mathematical and computational proof as pseudoscience.
@steakhunt@elonmusk@MattWalshBlog I know I'll regret this, but I'm going to respond. Yes, most judges have been to law school and went through the con law course. So they have the raw materials to backfill whatever argument they feel suits their purpose -- undermining the preservation of Western Civilization.
@elonmusk@MattWalshBlog Elon, just say it. You know as well as I none of these judges will ever be fired or impeached. The only way out this abyss is to ignore their unconstitutional and unhistorical rulings.
@ScottAdamsSays@spartandawgs Thanks, but I don't need luck. @EthicalSkeptic already proved his value during the first three months of covid. Moist robots though we are, some of us can nonetheless discern between credentialism and real chops when it counts most.
@AlexBerenson So the exponential explosion of autism cases in the last decades is all due to better diagnosis. Cuz nobody in the 70's noticed all those undiagnosed people walking around. Must have been the combination of coke and disco.