@CallMeAshay@pavyg I don't think we're all that far off from one another. I only brought up the charity thing because if @pavyg is going to bring in Gates, who isn't on the tour, then every topic is up for grabs, and the discrepancy in not going after Zverev is pretty obvious.
@CallMeAshay@pavyg Every time you try a "gotcha" with me, I basically say you're exactly right. The question is, why doesn't @pavyg do the same? That's me entire point.
@CallMeAshay@pavyg You seem to be in the same camp as @pavyg. He's cheated, and that's on him. If he gets charged and convicted, he should be punished. I've said that 3x already. But you and @pavyg bringing him into this discussion about tennis is absurd. You stop, and I'll stop.
@CallMeAshay@pavyg How is there no context when rumors and accusations are the only thing @pavyg can go on, which is why you need to use the words "potential" & "possible" but the only concrete thing we know is that he has turned the 2nd half of his career into helping others and it's indisputable.
@CallMeAshay@pavyg I have not read that Gates is a "potential" trafficker. Have you? And setting that aside, you're really putting a lot of weight on that word.
@CallMeAshay@pavyg Just posting your own words to prove my point. Every billionaire will open a "charity shop" to cover up for their bad deeds. Any other way to read that?
@CallMeAshay@pavyg And it seems a bit odd that you're turning his work in charity as a negative against him. The only thing he has acknowledged is that he cheated on his then wife. He should suffer the consequences of that. Everything else - if he's charged and convicted, let him rot.
@CallMeAshay@pavyg The context is that Gates hasn't been charged with anything, and as for the measure of the man, he has done a lot of good work. The only thing verifiable is that he has done good work. Until he is charged with something, what is the point?
@CallMeAshay@pavyg And not a u-turn. If he (and you) stop talking about him (which, again, he's not a tennis player), then there's nothing to talk about. But if he and you bring him up, the context argument is still relevant. But keep going if you want.
@CallMeAshay@pavyg I wouldn't have brought up Gates at all if it weren't for @pavyG bringing it up in the first place. But if you want to keep going, please do!
@CallMeAshay@pavyg But if you're going to bring it up, decades means that he's been doing good deeds to this very day for a very, very long time. That interview was a moment in time. Context.