wazzup | ETHGas ⛽

ISLM_MAXI

[Bitget @bitget]

Join our 𝕏 Space with our CMO @ignaciobitget and @MrIPalomera, Co-Founder of @bondexapp, to talk about #Blockchain4Youth Learning Hub and more!

🎁 $500 Giveaway (20 winners x $25 USDT)
✅ Follow @bitget + RT
✅ Tune in: https://t.co/bFLcZ3ZbLx
✅ Share a screenshot of you in the Space

Don’t miss it!

[wazzup | ETHGas ⛽ @wazzupp0]

@TTrades_edu very useful ser

[wazzup | ETHGas ⛽ @wazzupp0]

@TTrades_edu funded account broo

[wazzup | ETHGas ⛽ @wazzupp0]

@ORBT_protocol. touching grass is not on my vocubolary tho, need to learn more and more.

[wazzup | ETHGas ⛽ @wazzupp0]

@nabylc wtf that usat? damn

[Nabyl Charania @nabylc]

Most discussions about AI onchain fixate on capability. That’s what I call the easy part.

The harder question is coordination.

- Who can interact with whom?
- Why should they be trusted to do so?

Portable reputation standards like ERC-8004 are interesting because they treat identity and credibility as infrastructure.

If agents are going to operate across organizations, reputation can’t reset every time context changes.

This isn’t about making AI smarter. It’s about making interaction legible.

[wazzup | ETHGas ⛽ @wazzupp0]

@0xConnor_ @ORBT_Protocol this is like all in one that thing must be go beyond

[Connor @0xConnor_]

Narratives rotate. Chains rise and fall. Protocols come and go.

But liquidity? Liquidity is the constant this world runs on.

@ORBT_Protocol is the layer that connects it all.

[wazzup | ETHGas ⛽ @wazzupp0]

@0xMPC volume is the real goat

[Mrudul Chauhan @0xMPC]

After 2017, ICO volume collapsed for similar reasons:

- fast extraction
- weak accountability
- recycled liquidity.

Volumes came back only after infrastructure matured.

Trust usually breaks when incentives reward speed over survivability for too long.

[wazzup | ETHGas ⛽ @wazzupp0]

@vladtenev The valuation claims invite factual nitpicking.
The $350B Anthropic number and “trillions before IPO” prediction are plausible but not settled facts. A defensive reader could latch onto this and ignore the broader point. The argument doesn’t need exact numbers to work.

[Connor @0xConnor_]

Anthropic raising at $350B while publishing essays about the dangers of concentrated power is genuinely funny.

Vlad noticed it on time. More people should too.

[wazzup | ETHGas ⛽ @wazzupp0]

@ORBT_Protocol Defi score shows you what your really onchain activity and how good you are in this space. kudos to the team for creating it.

[wazzup | ETHGas ⛽ @wazzupp0]

@0xMPC indeed, quality over hype

[Mrudul Chauhan @0xMPC]

Unpopular opinion: Most crypto projects are fundable but not investable.

> Fundable means you have a good narrative, decent timing, and enough hype to get VCs to wire money.

That bar is lower than most people think.

> Investable means there’s a real path to revenue or value that builds over time.

And that bar is higher than most people want to admit.

[wazzup | ETHGas ⛽ @wazzupp0]

@KeshavSPandya so what is brex really is?

[Keshav @KeshavSPandya]

This Brex acquisition isn’t surprising if you’ve watched how banks actually buy.

1. This wasn’t about cards. Capital One bought an operating system for enterprise spend.

2. The price tells the story. $12.3B peak valuation → $5.15B exit. I would not call this a failure - this is a repricing of growth vs usefulness.

3. Brex stopped being “startup fintech” years ago. It moved toward infrastructure that plugs into ERP, treasury, and controls.

4. Banks rarely build this internally. Legacy stacks + regulatory friction make buying faster than rewriting.

5. This deal sits next to Capital One’s Discover move for a reason. They’re stitching distribution + network + software into one stack.

Apart from this being about Brex it’s also about banks realizing that modern finance is becoming software first.

[wazzup | ETHGas ⛽ @wazzupp0]

@nabylc oh so brian said it ?

[Nabyl Charania @nabylc]

The Davos exchange was revealing (not for the joke, but for what it signaled).

Central banks are very good at managing systems they already control. They’re less comfortable evaluating assets that exist without an issuer, without discretion, and without a policy lever.

That discomfort often shows up as analogies that flatten important differences.

Beef, apples, coal - all depend on supply chains, storage, spoilage, and domestic production. And reserve assets are meant to do the opposite.

Bitcoin forces institutions to confront: What does value look like when it doesn’t ask permission?

You can reject the answer. But avoiding the question entirely usually means it matters.

[wazzup | ETHGas ⛽ @wazzupp0]

@0xMPC aight