Another week, another batch of well deserved upgrades!
Huge congratulations to everyone who earned the Refined role this week! Behind every upgrade is consistency showing up, contributing, helping others, and being part of the community even when nobody is watching . It’s always great to see those efforts get recognized. This milestone is yours, so enjoy it! Keep bringing the energy, keep supporting the community, and keep pushing forward. New role today, bigger milestones tomorrow. Congratulations once again to all the newly Refined members! And to the Observer crew your turn could be next. Keep grinding. Keep contributing. Keep leveling up.
@get_optimum
Why Intent-Based Architecture Is More Scalable Than Traditional Transactions?
@FlutonIO uses an intent based execution model that changes how users interact with blockchain infrastructure. Instead of defining every execution step, users define the desired outcome and @FlutonIO handles the execution process.
1. Traditional Transaction Model:
In a traditional transaction, the user usually needs to specify the execution path before submitting it.
Fixed Execution: The user defines the contract, parameters, route, amount, and other transaction details upfront.
Single Execution Path: Once submitted, the transaction follows the specified path.
Cross Chain Complexity: Moving assets across chains can require multiple protocols, transactions, and intermediate steps.
Public Parameters: Transaction details are visible on chain, exposing execution preferences and strategy.
2. Intent Based Execution:
Fluton separates the desired outcome from the execution path.
Outcome First: Users specify what they want to achieve rather than exactly how it should happen.
Solver Competition: Relayers can compete to fulfill the intent based on factors such as output, fees, and execution time.
Flexible Routing: The execution path can be selected according to the available offers instead of being permanently fixed by the user.
Encrypted Intents: @FlutonIO can keep sensitive intent information encrypted throughout routing and execution.
3. How Fluton Handles the Workflow:
The architecture separates the user request from execution.
Intent Creation: The user creates an intent describing the desired outcome.
Submission: The signed intent is registered for execution.
Offer Discovery: Available relayers provide execution offers.
Offer Selection: The suitable offer can be selected based on the execution strategy.
Execution & Settlement: The selected relayer fulfills the intent and the result is settled through the protocol.
This structure allows the same intent infrastructure to support bridging, swaps, payments, yield strategies, and other cross chain actions without requiring users to manually construct every execution step.
@FlutonIO essentially moves blockchain interaction from "define every transaction step" to "define the outcome and let the execution network handle the path."
Why do blockchain networks need a dedicated acceleration layer?
@get_optimum focuses on a part of blockchain infrastructure that often gets overlooked: how quickly data moves between nodes. As networks grow, simply increasing compute capacity isn't enough if the underlying data still takes too long to reach everyone.
1. Traditional Network Bottlenecks:
Blockchain nodes rely on peer to peer communication to exchange blocks and transactions.
Propagation Delays: Data usually travels through multiple peers before reaching the rest of the network, adding latency along the way.
Network Congestion: Higher transaction and block volumes can put additional pressure on existing communication paths.
Geographic Distance: Nodes spread across different regions can experience different delivery times because of physical distance and network conditions.
2. The Acceleration Layer:
This is where a dedicated data acceleration layer can improve the way blockchain information is distributed.
Efficient Data Delivery: Instead of relying only on conventional peer to peer forwarding, optimized networking can help data move through the network more efficiently.
Network Coding: Optimum uses Random Linear Network Coding (RLNC) to encode data into multiple pieces, allowing nodes to collect useful information from available transmissions.
Better Resilience: Coded data can reduce the impact of individual packet losses or unreliable connections during propagation.
3. Optimum's Approach:
@get_optimum is focused on building infrastructure specifically around blockchain data movement.
Data Acceleration: The network is designed to improve how blocks and other blockchain data propagate between distributed nodes.
Validator Coordination: Faster and more reliable data delivery can help validators stay better synchronized with the network.
Scalable Infrastructure: As blockchain networks become larger and more geographically distributed, improving the data layer becomes increasingly important.
A blockchain can have powerful execution and consensus mechanisms, but they still depend on one fundamental thing:
the data has to get there first.
That is the problem a dedicated acceleration layer like @get_optimum is designed to address.