Interested in too many things, always something to learn, seek truth, stay curious, Smile & Laugh in-between it all ~ Views My Own ~ â«âźïžonđâ«
đšđșđž âIf this was happening it would be on the Newsâ
Marjorie Taylor Greene formerly announce Bill to stop the spraying of Americaâs skies.
Well, it finally happened. After months of dodging questions and hiding behind vague platitudes about âclimate leadership,â Prime Minister Mark Carneyâs official conflict-of-interest screen has been released by the Ethics Commissionerâand what it reveals is nothing short of staggering. Not five entities. Not a dozen. One hundred and three. Thatâs how many corporate and financial interests Carney has quietly acknowledged are too conflicted for him to touch.
At the center of this web? Brookfield Asset Management, the $1 trillion global investment firm where Carney was Vice-Chair before walking straight into Canadaâs top political office. The very same Brookfield that owns energy projects, pipelines, nuclear companies, real estate empires, carbon offset schemes you name it, theyâve got a piece of it. And now, theyâve got a former executive running the country.
Weâre told itâs all perfectly legal. Weâre told Carney has ârecused himself.â But what this disclosure actually shows is something much bigger: a government captured by finance, a prime minister with deep, ongoing entanglements in the very sectors his policies now enrich, and a climate agenda thatâs beginning to look a whole lot like a money-printing operation for the global elite.
The deeper one digs into Prime Minister Mark Carneyâs ethics disclosure, the clearer the picture becomes: whatâs been framed as a climate leadership story is, in reality, a tightly wound web of commercial interest wrapped in green rhetoric. The 103-entity conflict-of-interest screen, ostensibly a shield against impropriety, instead serves as a road map of how thoroughly Canadaâs top political office is entangled in the global green finance complex centered around Brookfield Asset Management.
As of Q1 2025, Brookfield reports $125 billion in assets under management (AUM) in its Renewable Power & Transition segment, a figure representing 12.5% of its overall $1 trillion portfolio. This segment alone encompasses most of the entities on Carneyâs ethics screen: nearly 60 out of 103, even after accounting for duplicates. These arenât passive holdings theyâre the very projects, technologies, and subsidy-eligible vehicles Carney once oversaw directly as vice-chair of Brookfield and as co-lead of its $15 billion Global Transition Fund.
Brookfieldâs renewables portfolio is vast: over 41.8 GW in installed capacity globally across wind, solar, hydro, and storage, with a 200+ GW development pipeline. A significant portion of this is owned or operated through the same SPVs and subsidiaries now appearing on the conflict list. Notable entries include Scout Clean Energy ($1B), Urban Grid ($650M), and Standard Solar ($540M). These acquisitions were all completed while Carney was at Brookfield, and they continue to generate revenue from U.S. and Canadian subsidy frameworks programs now shaped by the very government he leads.
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P., the sector flagship, holds approximately $95 billion in total assets and generated $315 million in funds from operations in Q1 2025 alone. The firm is planning to add another 8 GW in capacity this year expansion that is, in part, subsidized through the same green transition policies Carney has promoted both in office and as a climate finance advocate.
The line between public and private interest blurs even further when examining the entities categorized under the "energy transition" banner; nuclear, CCS (carbon capture and storage), and so-called e-fuels. Carneyâs screen includes Brookfieldâs recent $8 billion acquisition of Westinghouse Electric Company, a nuclear power behemoth now positioned to benefit from Canadaâs federal nuclear incentives and SMR (small modular reactor) program. Other flagged investments like Entropy and Carbon TerraVault fall directly into carbon credit and offset schemesâmarkets heavily influenced by federal regulation and incentive design.
Letâs stop pretending. What weâre witnessing here isnât just conflict of interest, itâs a complete merger of state power and corporate ambition, all dressed up in the language of moral urgency. The Ethics Commissionerâs so-called âscreenâ for Mark Carney? Itâs a joke. A checklist. A bureaucratic fig leaf meant to reassure you that everythingâs above board. But itâs not.
Because hereâs the truth: Carney is policing himself. Heâs supposed to recuse himself from decisions that benefit the 103 entities heâs tied to many of which he helped create or oversee as Vice-Chair of Brookfield Asset Management. But who decides if heâs in conflict? He does. Or more accurately, the PMO does. The same PMO now drafting Dominion Barton-style focus groups to figure out how best to sell you the green grift. Thereâs no third-party oversight, no transparency on whatâs actually in his so-called blind trust, and no disclosure of the carried interest he may still be entitled to from Brookfieldâs billions in funds.
Meanwhile, the policy levers of government are being pulled in exactly the direction Brookfield bet on. Wind, solar, carbon capture, nuclear, every so-called âtransitionâ sector that Brookfield spent years buying into is now flush with green subsidies, ESG guarantees, and taxpayer-backed investment shields. This isnât the free market at work, itâs a strategic payoff, engineered by someone whoâs now running one of the most powerful G7 economies.
And again, none of it is illegal. Thatâs the most damning part. Because legality isnât the standard here. The standard is integrity, and thatâs nowhere to be found. The scale of this overlap isnât just large. Itâs systemic. Itâs built into the very foundation of the Carney governmentâs climate policy. The same man who structured these funds is now the man signing off on the policies that make them profitable.
Diana Fox Carneyâs Quiet Role in the Climate Cash Machine
And just when you thought the web of influence stopped at the Prime Minister himself, along comes Diana Fox Carney, economist, climate consultant, and spouse of the most well-connected man in Canadian politics. While Mark Carney's direct financial entanglements with Brookfield Asset Management are now public record, his wifeâs career trajectory paints an equally troubling picture of how the same elite networks driving Canadaâs green spending are profiting in parallel, behind the curtain.
Diana Fox Carney currently holds a senior advisory role at Eurasia Group, the New York-based geopolitical risk consultancy thatâs become a quiet powerhouse in shaping global ESG narratives. Itâs also the same firm where Gerald ButtsâTrudeauâs longtime fixer and architect of the federal climate playbookânow serves as vice chair. Add in former journalist Evan Solomon and even Conservative stalwart John Baird, and youâve got a bipartisan consultancy stacked with Canadian political operators. Convenient? Maybe. Coordinated? You decide.
And what has this firm staffed with Liberal-era insiders received in return? Millions in untendered government contracts, including a $446,210 deal from Natural Resources Canada in 2024 for vaguely defined "geopolitical research." Thatâs nearly half a million dollars in taxpayer money handed out without competition, to a firm employing the sitting Prime Ministerâs wifeâand his former colleagues. Just coincidence, right?
But Eurasia Group is only the start. Dianaâs reach extends far beyond advisory calls. Sheâs connected to:
BeyondNetZero, a climate equity fund backed by U.S. private capital giant General Atlantic.
Helios CLEAR, investing in African climate âresilience.â
ClientEarth U.S. and the Shell Foundation, both pushing aggressive environmental litigation and policy influence.
Canada 2020, a Trudeau-aligned think tank thatâs pocketed over $1 million in federal grants.
Throw in indirect ties to Gates Foundation funding, Save the Children, and research networks influencing African agriculture, and youâre looking at a network of transnational climate consultants with deep, ongoing influence over the exact climate policies the federal government is now implementing under her husbandâs leadership.
Now, legally, Diana is in the clear. Sheâs not a public office holder. But thatâs the point. The rules werenât designed for this new class of political operatorâthe dual-career globalist power couple, where one side signs the climate cheques while the other cashes them. No formal disclosure is required. No recusals. No transparency. Yet the influence is there. The access is there. The money is flowing.
Opposition Reaction: Pierre Poilievre Slams Carney's Hidden Conflicts, Demands Real Transparency
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre wasted no time responding to the bombshell ethics screen showing Prime Minister Mark Carney is recusing himself from dealings with over 100 companies, many tied to his former employer, Brookfield Asset Management. In a pair of direct and widely shared posts, Poilievre accused Carney of concealing critical financial entanglements from voters during the 2025 election, and warned that the Liberal leader is now either positioned to profit from federal decisions or paralyzed from making them.
âMark Carney must explain why he kept these conflicts secret from voters until after the election,â Poilievre wrote. âNow he will be in a position to profit from big decisions or will be forced to sit out those decisions altogether. Either way, Canadians will pay the price.â
In a second post earlier that morning, Poilievre challenged the credibility of Carneyâs so-called blind trust, urging the Prime Minister to liquidate his holdings entirely and hand the cash to a trustee who can invest it without Carneyâs knowledge or influence:
âOtherwise, he will always know how political decisions can affect his personal wealth.â
These statements mark the strongest opposition rebuke yet of the Carney government's financial entanglements. Poilievreâs message echoes growing public criticism that the ethics screen is little more than window dressing, lacking third-party oversight, and that it fails to address indirect benefit through carried interest, deferred compensation, or spousal affiliations.
While Carney has claimed he is in full compliance with federal ethics laws, the fact that the disclosures were released only after the election is fueling outrageânot just among Conservatives but from broader accountability watchdogs. With over 100 entities flagged, many of them tied to green energy, infrastructure, and climate financeâthe same sectors receiving billions in federal spendingâthe Conservative leader has positioned himself as the voice of those demanding a full forensic audit of the Prime Ministerâs interests.
The message from the opposition is clear: if this were a Conservative leader, the media would be calling it a scandal. But because it's Carneyâthe global banker, the climate envoy, the Liberal saviorâthe establishment is looking the other way. Poilievreâs Conservatives arenât. And theyâre turning this into a defining issue of integrity and accountability in Canadian politics.
Letâs Call This What It Is
This isnât subtle. This isnât nuanced. This is what a grift looks likeâon paper, in public, in black and white. Over one hundred conflicts of interest tied directly to Mark Carney. Entire portfolios of foreign and domestic holdings, billions in green investments, shell companies in Bermudaâand thatâs before we even get to his wifeâs global consultancy work, advising firms that quietly gobble up federal contracts without a single public tender.
And hereâs the thing: we werenât told any of this during the election. There was no press conference, no headline, no public vetting of the sprawling web of corporate and climate interests now tied to the highest office in the country. Why? Because it would have compromised the Liberal grip on power. Because the last thing this party wanted Canadians to know was that their new leader wasnât just a bankerâbut a banker with a boardroomâs worth of financial strings still attached.
Now imagineâjust for a momentâif it had been Pierre Poilievre. Or Andrew Scheer. Or any Conservative leader with over a hundred screened entities, global finance ties, offshore SPVs, and a spouse employed by a company collecting millions in government money. The press would be in a frenzy. The CBC would be running specials. Theyâd be calling him compromised, unfit, a foreign agent.
But because itâs their guyâbecause itâs the Liberal eliteâs banker-in-chiefâweâre told itâs fine. Itâs all above board. Move along, nothing to see here.
Nonsense. Absolute nonsense.
This is not leadership. This is ideological grifting at the highest level. The Liberal Party, once the party of national unity and democratic accountability, has become a hollowed-out machine for elite interests. Theyâre not liberals. Theyâre griftersâgrifting for green subsidies, globalist contracts, and personal access to power. They have no principle left. Just consultants, contracts, and a taxpayer-funded narrative to keep the game going.
Enough. Canadians didnât vote for this. They werenât told the truth. And now the entire climate agenda, the whole âjust transition,â looks more like a get-rich scheme for the political class than any serious public mission.
Itâs time for an election. Time to clear house. Time to drain this toxic, green-glossed swamp once and for all.
Palestinian âaid workersâ in Gaza caught staging video with child.
One of the men films a young child carrying water before another comes in to carry the water for the camera.
Once the video is filmed, the man abandons the child and walks off with the water.
@planethunter56 When you understand that our âreal worldâ is just the front-end of the Simulator, and the âspirit worldâ is the back-endâŠand the spirit world is the REAL worldâŠbased on level realityâŠthen this quote makes more sense.
The spirit world (non-physical) is where 99% is from
When you tax something, you get less of it.
If you donât want businesses to expand, tax the hell out of them.
If you donât want people to work, take their money.
Thatâs why itâs so important that we passed the One Big Beautiful Bill and blocked a $4.3 trillion tax hike.
If you are doing ONLY what your Oncologist tells you to do, you will not live very long.
They only need to keep you alive 1-2 years to maximize Big Pharma profits from cancer treatments that donât work.
Repurposed drugs save lives.
Ivermectin. Fenbendazole. Mebendazole.
Your first ever spending bill boosted the cost of government by 8% in just one year. That's twice the combined rate of inflation and population growth.
Maybe, don't treat us all like we're fools. Government doesn't have any money of its own - it all comes out of taxpayers' pockets. Canadians pay the bill even though they now have less and less money, no matter how hard they work and save. The Liberals have driven up the cost of living and force Canadians to spend more on taxes than on housing and food combined. Your fake contrast word salad doesn't help.
Coffee futures have dropped over 30% since February, yet ground coffee prices in Canada are up 19% since January.
Why?
Three words: Ottawaâs counter-tariffs.
Chinaâs Maglev train just clocked 620 mph â thatâs faster than most commercial airplanes.
This isnât sci-fi; itâs the next phase of ultra-high-speed travel. With magnetic levitation tech and zero physical contact with the tracks, the future of transportation is not just fast â it's frictionless.
Can the RCMP, Dave Eby, and Lena Diab tell British Columbians why these individuals have not been arrested and deported?
Unless you are telling us there are different rules for certain groups?
@rcmpgrcpolice, @Dave_Eby, @LenaMetlegeDiab
đšđ± RUBIN OBSERVATORY CAMERA SPOTS 2,100 ASTEROIDS IN 10 HOURS
Chileâs Vera Rubin Observatory just fired up the biggest digital camera on Earth, 3,200 megapixels, and instantly rewrote the sky map.
In a single 10-hour test run, it caught 2,100 new asteroids and snapped 10 million galaxies in one image.
Source: @konstructivizm
"Cholesterol is one of the most important defence mechanisms we have in the body."
"As far as being the best protector against heart disease, against stroke, against cancerâyou're not going to get over cancer unless you get the cholesterol levels above 200."
"If we have a patient who stays around 120, 130, 140... they are not going to recover very rapidly."