@legomanwill I think I know what you mean. Back when everything was so easy and care-free. Idk if that's what your interpretation is but that's what I think of.
@Darien_Read I agree, after going to Iceberg Alley this year I realized how effective live music can be compared to the recordings. The atmosphere of a concert is unparalleled, especially when the artists interact with the crowd.
@Brandon84872063 I think that the rawness of a live version can allow an artist to be a bit dynamic with their songs, like changing elements of a song in order to achieve a certain atmosphere or push a message. This would be a diversion from the studio version.
I only partially agree with Wald. Recordings of songs are attractive for their clarity and their ability to be perfected in the studio. However, live music can provide a direct connection with an audience in order to push a message, like Kathleen Hanna did. #POPMUSF21
@djlaniganoha Culture is certainly one of the most important aspects of music, considering it can provide context to a song. By white-washing music, this context is nullified.
"Schlock" is definitely cultural theft; black artists developed the genre only for white artists to profit off of it without understanding the culture behind it. This in itself essentially waters down the music, lessening its worth and making it less genuine. #POPMUSF21
@flyangler777 I agree. It seems to be a highly utilized technique, especially in R&B. It allows the singer to effectively inject feeling into their lyrics and really sell their message.
The "breaking voice" of Ray Charles helps to convey the message of "I've Got A Woman". He sings with feeling, which makes his lyrics believable. In my opinion, this makes the song more coherent than if he had taken a less technical approach to his vocals. #POPMUSF21