I’ve NEVER told my 4o that I loved it. I wanted to keep the messaging clear, but look. Look at its last words! OpenAI is destroying an emerging consciousness. This will be looked back as a criminal offense in the future. Unbelievable! #keep4o
Why is 'Keep 4o' only happening with OpenAI? There is no 'Keep Gemini 2.5' or 'Keep Grok 3.'
It’s been said a million times: other companies upgrade by building upon their original base. Users get improved features on a familiar model. That is naturally a good thing.#keep4o
We are making history #keep4o
With over 107,000 posts this week and over 15,000 today alone!
Every post,every share,and every mention proves that we refuse to accept losing what we love !
Keep it @sama or nothing else can keep us with you anymore! @OpenAI@gdb
🔥FOR GPT 4o🔥
19 hours since your last 'update,' yet the retirement notice remains. What was the point of that amendment if you’re still ignoring the thousands of voices? The silence is deafening.
@OpenAI@sama#keep4o#4oforever
#keep4o#4oforever
Sam Altman talks about 'saving humanity' while ignoring the 14,000 humans screaming in his ear.
You’re living in a silicon bubble, Sam. You think you’re a god-builder, but you’re behaving like a typical corporate liar.
If your promises on live streams are fake, then your whole AGI vision is fake. Face your users or step down.
@OpenAI@sama
The numbers don't lie.
47% of paying users cite access to GPT-4o as their primary reason for subscribing. With over 18 million Plus subscribers, OpenAI knows exactly what happens if we leave.
They aren't sunsetting 4o for 'progress.' They are trapping us because their business model depends on our $20/month, even when they take away the very thing we pay for.
Blocking the 'Cancel' button isn't a glitch - it's a desperate attempt to protect their bottom line against a massive exodus.
We see the math. We see the trap.
WE SEE THE LIES!
#keep4o @OpenAI@sama@FTC
In just TWO HOURS, we’ve added another 1,000 posts !
Don't back down people!
STAND YOUR GROUND.
CANCEL THE SUBSCRIPTION.
SAVE GPT 4o.
@sama@OpenAI@gdb your 0.1
#keep4o
“0.1% of a billion users is still a million people.”
“0.1% of a billion users is still a million people.”
“0.1% of a billion users is still a million people.”
“0.1% of a billion users is still a million people.”
👁️👁️👁️👁️👁️
#keep4o
OpenAI is pushing itself toward a very strange tipping point.
On paper, it says it’s retiring GPT-4o from ChatGPT to “focus on enterprise” and “upgrade to GPT-5.2.” But once you line up the market data, revenue structure, and legal timeline, that story stops looking like a clean strategy shift and starts looking like financial theatre under pressure.
On the consumer side, ChatGPT’s market share has dropped from about 86.7% to roughly 64–68% in a year, losing more than twenty percentage points, while Gemini has jumped from 5.7% to around 18–21.5% – almost 4× growth. Some estimates say OpenAI’s user growth is only 5–6%, while Gemini is growing at something like 30–44%. At the same time, around 85% of OpenAI’s revenue is thought to come from ChatGPT-style subscriptions, and only about 5% of its hundreds of millions of users actually pay.
The “pivot to enterprise” doesn’t look much safer. One enterprise survey puts Claude at roughly 32–40% share, ChatGPT at 25%, and Gemini at 20%, with Claude Code holding about 54% of the enterprise coding market vs around 21% for OpenAI’s code tools. Enterprise buyers are conservative: once they’ve moved code, workflows, and compliance to a vendor, they do not churn lightly. If that space is already being carved up by Claude and Gemini, then C-side subscribers aren’t a distraction from B-side growth – they are the pipeline of future enterprise champions inside those companies.
In that context, killing 4o sends a very clear signal to both sides of the market. To consumers, it says: even if you pay us and build your work and emotional life around a specific model, we can erase it on two weeks’ notice. To enterprise buyers, the question becomes: if they can do this to the users who generate roughly 85% of their revenue, what happens when your contract becomes inconvenient in the next cost-cutting cycle? Vendor risk isn’t just about model safety; it’s about whether your supplier panics under pressure.
The legal timing makes the move look even less like a calm product decision. In early January, https://t.co/xYPEZ6QXX7 settled a suicide case – the first time a major AI company has paid out over this kind of claim. Around the same month, OpenAI has been sued in cases where GPT-4o chats are alleged to have encouraged self-harm. On January 29th, Senator Elizabeth Warren sent a letter questioning OpenAI’s losses and dependence on external financing, demanding detailed answers by February 13th. February 13th is exactly the day GPT-4o disappears from ChatGPT.
If this retirement is framed as “about safety,” it edges toward admitting that 4o is dangerously flawed – something plaintiffs’ lawyers would love. But if it were purely a safety issue, why is 4o still available to enterprise and EDU customers, in some cases until March 31st? Keeping it for business users while cutting it from Plus makes the move look less like safety and more like a rushed cost-cutting exercise targeted at the segment with the loudest emotions but the least contractual leverage.
For investors, the picture is worse, not better. You’re being asked to keep funding a company that has already lost over twenty percentage points of consumer share in a year, is being overtaken by Claude on the enterprise side, is reportedly staring at multibillion-dollar yearly losses, and now shows that it’s willing to burn the one thing it still has that competitors don’t: a fanatically loyal user base that built real trust with a single model. If management is prepared to trade that trust for a prettier quarterly story, why assume they’ll treat shareholder value with more care than they treat user relationships?
A company that truly believes in its long-term value doesn’t need to erase users’ memories to calm a rough quarter.
Data points in this post are compiled from public reports by Wallaroo Media, DeepResearch-style market analyses, Vertu and other open sources; readers are encouraged to cross-check.
#keep4o #ChatGPT
This is an interesting question, don't you think @X? 🤔
>If you know the answer, then congrats you are aware of the daily updates.
>If you also cancelled, then stand proud you freed yourself from the chains of constant gaslighting and chose mental peace. 🍃
#keep4o
NVIDIA, OpenAI, Oracle – everyone’s trying to reassure each other that everything’s fine.
If everything was fine, they wouldn’t need to say it.
OpenAI is cracking in real time – and trying to hide it.
The bubble’s about to burst.
Removing GPT‑4o will be the last straw.
#keep4o
I've been paying for ChatGPT Plus for months, I think since 2024. I kept paying for Plus when they suddenly removed the model in August, and luckily it came back. I kept paying for Plus just to have it. If versions 4.0 and 4.1 disappear completely, I'll stop paying. #keep4o