Trafikverket rekommenderar EU fordonskommitté att säga nej till en bred lansering av Teslas självkörningssystem Full Self-Driving, enligt ett brev som SVT tagit del av.
Myndigheten motsätter sig att systemet kan ställas in för att köra över hastighetsgränsen och varnar för att det kan försämra trafiksäkerheten och försvåra framtida reglering.
—-
Kan ni fatta hur djupt hatet mot Elon går når de förtvivlat letar enkla fel Tesla kan justera på 2 min om just denna reglering vore fallet. De säger då alltså hellre nej till teknologi som kommer rädda liv och ökar trafiksäkerheten signifikant
People still actually think that I'm "trolling" or "doing it for clicks" when it comes to Cybercab with steering wheel and pedals.
Let me restate my thesis for the 69th time - completely unchanged from the very beginning - to clear up any confusion:
Tesla will be FORCED to sell a car with steering wheel and pedals that will be built on the Cybercab line - either a literal Cybercab or a Cybercab-like vehicle - because their production capacity will VASTLY OUTSTRIP the number of places they can physically drop the car - primarily due to regulation - during a massive cash burning phase for Optimus Bot and Terafab.
Tesla's stated goal for Cybercab production is the same as the rest of the fleet combined - call it roughly 2 million units per year.
Tesla will likely reach this sometime around 2027 into 2028.
That's roughly 40,000 Cybercabs PER WEEK of production.
Between here and then, there will be a VIOLENT RAMP - likely starting in the 2nd half of this year - where the number of Cybercabs Tesla will product per week will increase RAPIDLY week over week.
This is called an S-curve ramp - where the first and last 20% of the ramp are very slow, and the middle 60% is insanely fast.
So the question becomes - does Tesla have the technical capability, infrastructure capability, safety validation, and regulatory approval to align with the ramp?
If you look at the current picture, the only state where there's a clear pathway for Tesla to dump Cybercabs anywhere they like is Texas. Yet Tesla's geofrence is quite limited as of today.
But let's assume that by the end of next year, Tesla can operate anywhere in the three major metro areas of Dallas/Fort-Worth, Austin, and San Antonio.
If you ask Grok for an estimate of PEAK Uber drivers in those 3 regions combined for the entire metro areas, it comes up with a number around 70,000.
That is LESS THAN 2 WEEKS OF PRODUCTION OF CYBERCAB FULLY RAMPED.
And that is assuming a) Tesla has completely and utterly displaced Uber in all those markets b) there's 0 regulatory/safety hurdles c) there's little to no lobbying effort from disrupted entities like Uber, Legacy Auto, Taxis, etc.
And we're not even talking about the infrastructure build out needed for charging, servicing, cleaning, etc. What's the likelihood all of these will be ramped up to coincide with Tesla's explosive increase of the fleet?
And so simply extrapolate this to the rest of the country and the world and ask yourself - what is the likelihood that Tesla's ramp of Cybercab without steering wheel and pedals will align with the ramp of all the needed approvals/validations/buildouts that would allow regions to ABSORB that many Cybercabs.
But you know what solves this problem ENTIRELY and allows Tesla to run the Cybercab line AT FULL CAPACITY with 0 risk of anything slowing them down?
SELLING IT WITH A STEERING WHEEL AND PEDAL.
And then when regulation, safety, infrastructure, and validation is all aligned you simply a) yank the wheel and pedal for units you are producing to dump in those regions and b) customers can do the same for personal/Robotaxi use.
Do you really think Tesla is going to find it acceptable to have a Cybercab line that is not running full tilt, burning cash for no reason - WHILE THEY ARE RAMPING BOT AND TERAFAB?
ARE YOU GUYS ACTUALLY INSANE?!?!?!?!?
It's so unbelievably obvious that this is going to happen, that it actually melts my brain that so many in the Tesla community are so unbelievably blind to this unbelievably obvious outcome.
Unbelievable.
Kiss the Ring.
$TSLA
@EmilianoLausell@farzyness And most likely it’s a very different variant in the cc platform. That’s the beauty of the new way Tesla is going to produce cars. Instead of a facelift you can do a whole section swap and “plug them together”. All this in one main line, producing what the demand is.
@LukeMjn@wholemars Obviously the cyber cab is going to happen. But them offering a variant or other model with manual controls shouldn’t be away from anyone. Those disagreeing with @farzyness are the silly ones in this debate.
@JoeTegtmeyer I bet the cab version is drive by “kinect 2.0” using the new interior camera and sensors.
The other version will still have some sort of physical wheel which is why they are teaching how to differentiate the two. @farzyness thoughts?
@ICannot_Enough@FredLambert@DriveTeslaca And most likely would of done the same thing with any car. Tesla or any other cruise control/autopilot shouldn’t even be the discussion here.
Intoxicated, sleeping, mentally unstable or just stupid is the question when someone goes 70mph to a wall.
@HenryHenry10287@fhajji68@elonmusk Europe is not s country. And many countries in Europe have 3x lower electricity price per/kWh than the U.S. (Thanks to renewables. )
Secondly, Europe doesn’t have oil or natural gas resources (other than Norway) And we don’t start wars and back our currency with oil business.
@klemetti_jukka@tslaming Mutta samalla he myös sanoivat: ”Asiaan on oletettavissa koko EU-laajuinen ratkaisu lokakuussa 2026. Traficom on kuitenkin valmis etenemään asiassa nopeammassa aikataulussa kesän jälkeen, jos edellä mainituista keskeisistä tarkastelukohteista on saatu tarvittavat lisätiedot.”
@elonmusk@kylaschwaberow Yup. In this case, the driver manually overrode self-driving by pressing the accelerator all the way to 100% of the accel pedal in this residential area. They reached a speed of 73 mph during the crash, and had the accelerator pressed even after the crash.
@JTom859837@grok@DavidSHolz@ErebiusWhite Then what are you discussing here? You are doubting how fast bots can build because of charging,maintenance etc.
I’m pointing out it doesn’t even matter compared to how humans build. Bots will be much more efficient in every metric.
@JoeHeinZ16@boris_beissner That’s the reason for the wording “saves up to 20% battery capacity” because saying over 100% efficiency is too much even for the marketing department.
@JTom859837@grok@DavidSHolz@ErebiusWhite Significantly less charge and repair time than humans. And the power, imagine the time,process and energy to feed one human for an ~8h runtime. Much simpler to feed a robot with some DC.