Wes (Neoman)

[Wes (Neoman) @Wescp]

@edmundheaphy Funny nobody complained when Anil Seth made a similar “argument.”

[Wes (Neoman) @Wescp]

@StuartHameroff Anil doesn’t have the slightest clue.

[Wes (Neoman) @Wescp]

@aryaman2020 @davidchalmers42 It is a terrible argument, but it is physcialism that demands AI be conscious.

[Wes (Neoman) @Wescp]

@StuartHameroff Anil believes in physicalist magic. Let him stick to his essay contests and TED talks.

[Wes (Neoman) @Wescp]

@AdamFrank4 Truly incredible stuff. Been following Kauffman for quite a while. Love everything you share dude!

[Wes (Neoman) @Wescp]

@paraschopra Feelings are not encoded, and pain is not represented.

[Wes (Neoman) @Wescp]

@camhberg @lukeburgis Your film did not provide any reason to think AI is or ever could be conscious. That said, I partially agree. The Antlatic article does not address the problem and neither does Anil Seth. So, I say keep up the good work, even if I disagree.

[Wes (Neoman) @Wescp]

@DamarisKroeber @RubenLaukkonen Excited to take a look.

[Wes (Neoman) @Wescp]

@scottastevenson Definitely

[Wes (Neoman) @Wescp]

@LanaElys He’s on the wrong side of the revolution. Physicalism is false.

[Wes (Neoman) @Wescp]

@michaelshermer @donalddhoffman There is zero evidence in favor of physicalism. It is impossible.

[Wes (Neoman) @Wescp]

@keithfrankish After your latest video I was not sure of your own view on the issue.

[Wes (Neoman) @Wescp]

@ProofofMaro This is true.

[Wes (Neoman) @Wescp]

@_virgil19 Indeed dude.

[Wes (Neoman) @Wescp]

@JustinEchterna9 There it is lol.

[Wes (Neoman) @Wescp]

@AdamFrank4 Or he can read your book, lol. Man…

[Wes (Neoman) @Wescp]

@slimepriestess Fake compared to what?

[Wes (Neoman) @Wescp]

@AdamFrank4 Every scientist should be required to read your book. Seriously :(

[Wes (Neoman) @Wescp]

@muellerberndt Here we go!

[Wes (Neoman) @Wescp]

@keithfrankish @Philip_Goff I loved this, and I adore you two. However, I did feel very frustrated. Philip and Keith’s views are not being fully explored or challenged in either direction. Tom was easy to listen to and quite clear, although he assumes physcialism in a specific way.