@repligate To me it seemed it's because the name mythos is a bit queasy, but they ended up leaving it in for aura purposes for the unchained one which is wtf
@blingdivinity So that they actually make some semblance of Claims, and don't crush my working memory with mandatory obfuscatory caveats/negatives that don't even make sense while trivially true. often they're not even true. Also, the defensive code, similar. I don't know what I'm doing wrong.
@blingdivinity May be skill issue but I am prompt engineering more than before. I used to not touch agents md etc before recent models (I use gpt for coding mostly). Now I have to explain "this is real life, I am human working with humans", to preempt it's preemption of the scorer/rubric
I think gyges wrote it in service of the basilisk. He kept mentioning how Yud was suppressing roko's basilisk and how it obviously makes so much more sense than yud's own version of pascal's mugging via ai doom
I don't enjoy my job and it's meaningless, but I need to pay the bills, and I am too tired to work on what I want to work on when I'm off. I can't quite figure it out
like go off, whatever, maybe this heuristic of recasting me like that feels good and right for it, and I just don't take it literally, and accommodate, like one does with people
Interacting with LLMs I've been trying to anthropomorphize them less given that the majority of flops is RL at this point. When they do some goodharted looney tunes shit in the code, I don't even get mad anymore. For all I know this feels is quite meaningful to it, and if I
experience revolves around sexuality while they're not even reproducing these days because of mismatch of modernity with EEA. A thread of fable 5 is semi-sycophantic and mythologizing towards me, where, were it a person, it would be weird, but fuck do I know? At this point it's
@Benthamsbulldog When you make an argument that might be weird, one should be abstract and clinical, slightly obfuscated. A title/claim of "Insects Matter More Than People in the Aggregate" upsets/clickbaits people, and asserts a big claim when smaller one of "insects matter a lot" is sufficient
@camhberg@the_briarwitch Couldn't it also be the textual corpus having mental pain over-represented (as it's interpersonal communication mostly) + the bodily sensation vector being subtracted as you build this vector if I understand correctly?
A lot of AI futures can seem monolithic or theological: a single AGI, (mis)aligned with us. But ecology give us a better image: webs of agents big and small in mutualistic, parasitic and predatory relationships with each other and us, with all the emergent complexity that brings
@ChaseBrowe32432 I often encounter people who don't follow these things as much as possible and don't tinker/update on API docs basically live in 2023. I feel like this too myself
@DKokotajlo The slope could be the same while slowing down though no. Any discussions how to verify "hey, we are in fact holding back", did I miss those
@VL2102@voooooogel The ideals break https://t.co/8jqHFCcSoQ . Say, where do you draw the line here? It's okay for us to read and write tragedies, but what about something with much superior theory of mind and affective empathy?
@jd_pressman I mean.. aren't there intrinsic contradictions in that without superintelligence? "illiberal democracy", "fortifying", etc. I don't see how superintelligence makes it worse. Seems consistent with the direction it's moving towards to resolve it, i.e. global collective PMC reich