Fully Semi Automatic

The right to bear arms is a fundamental, individual, natural human right that shall not be infringed.

[Fully Semi Automatic @whack187]

Thread about 2A:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

[Fully Semi Automatic @whack187]

@jerrecd @akafacehots What does 2A legally require with the militia clause?

[Fully Semi Automatic @whack187]

@jimgphynn @akafacehots What does the prefatory clause of 2A legally require?

[Fully Semi Automatic @whack187]

@jerrecd @akafacehots Our right to keep and bear arms has always been independent on service in a militia.

2A does nothing with militias.

[Fully Semi Automatic @whack187]

@Alexmipego @gilfees SCOTUS argued the BoR only restricted the federal government in federal cases.

It wasn't until late 1800s | early 1900s where SCOTUS cases argued they in fact restricted STATE governments as well.

2A is not a right. It protects the right.

[Fully Semi Automatic @whack187]

@BruceHallman @EchoFiveSeven @USCons_Amend_II That is not true.

[Fully Semi Automatic @whack187]

@BruceHallman @EchoFiveSeven @USCons_Amend_II False

Keep and bear arms for the people.

Meaning the government cannot infringe on our individual right to keep and bear arms.

[Fully Semi Automatic @whack187]

@JayWalker7810 @BK_McCallum @KimsMom3 False

Right of the people, not right of the militia. You would see this if you actually read the Constitution.

The Bill of Rights protects the citizen's individual rights and liberties.

[Fully Semi Automatic @whack187]

@JayWalker7810 @BK_McCallum @KimsMom3 Not fake gun rights if the Constitution explicity protects that right.

How do I support gun rights more than children's safety?

[Fully Semi Automatic @whack187]

@JayWalker7810 @BK_McCallum @KimsMom3 Explain how I am wrong

[Fully Semi Automatic @whack187]

@JayWalker7810 @BK_McCallum @KimsMom3 ad hominem

[Fully Semi Automatic @whack187]

@JayWalker7810 @BK_McCallum @KimsMom3 You are not right.

The sole purpose of 2A is to protect and guarantee our right to keep and bear arms from being infringed by the government.

Our right has always been independent with militia service. 2A does nothing with militias.

[Fully Semi Automatic @whack187]

@brandonschwa7 @ShawnSwafford2 @02OCT1835 @louisanamom @d_t_1_7 @MixterJames @Eodyne1 @ms_tryl @RebornFatboy @TmthyPatrick @TheRevAlvin @schwatd2 @mtntallpaul But the weight of a legal ruling doesn't matter?

Regardless, murder is the unjustified killing of another. He was justified and proven in a court of law.

[Fully Semi Automatic @whack187]

@BruceHallman @EchoFiveSeven @USCons_Amend_II Please tell me what the militia clause does legally.

I have asked this question many times. You would be the first to answer.

[Fully Semi Automatic @whack187]

@BruceHallman @EchoFiveSeven @USCons_Amend_II The militia clause is not a requirement, limitation, Etc.

The militia clause does nothing legally.

[Fully Semi Automatic @whack187]

@FetinaHavens @USMC_First_In @JaneotN 2A does nothing with militias.

[Fully Semi Automatic @whack187]

@EaracheEye @DanQCarruthers @mehdirhasan @judgeluttig I just gave you one. You don’t like it.