@MikeCarlton01@BernardZuel Yes what a fuck Muppet, autistic people chanting "globalise the Intifada" should not be held accountable for what they say. So they should have a platform on the ABC. We need more diverse voices not some white comedian who took up Judaism so he could join a genocidal cult
@conlan_mairead@Mark_Dee_33@DavidShoebridge The flight logs are exactly what exonerates him. 15 hours. That's it. Have you seen the evidence? Because the defence would love to. You can indict a ham sandwich in a grand jury doesn't make it true. Dickhead
@conlan_mairead@Mark_Dee_33@DavidShoebridge Your arguments are incoherent. This has gone on long enough you've shown your true colours as a MAGA bot. Go back to jerking off over Donald.
@conlan_mairead@Mark_Dee_33@DavidShoebridge No evidence. No classified material. Not one other person charged not the RAF officers who ran the school, not Donaldson, not the French or German instructors. Just Dan. And you reckon he flew to South Africa to risk life in prison for $100K?
@conlan_mairead@Mark_Dee_33@DavidShoebridge And there it is. Not tactics. Not doctrine. Not fundamentals. Just 'he's a yank.' He's been an Australian citizen since Australia Day 2012. Has been for 14 years. But thanks for showing us what this was actually about the whole time. Dickhead
@conlan_mairead@Mark_Dee_33@DavidShoebridge The school was run by decorated former RAF officers. Keith Donaldson and other former RAF pilots were instructors. The flight logs show 15 hours total over the period. If this was a covert Chinese military intelligence operation the RAF ran it.
@conlan_mairead@Mark_Dee_33@DavidShoebridge Now it's tactics and decision-making. Not fundamentals , Western military doctrine. From a Major who left in 2002. In 15 hours. In South Africa. To two pilots who may not even have been PLA. You've just made the prosecution's case sound even more absurd than when we started.
@conlan_mairead@Mark_Dee_33@DavidShoebridge You've gone from carrier doctrine, to the B-52, to China acquiring retired jets, and now back to fundamentals. We started there!
15 hours. Decade-old skills. A plane nobody makes. Two unverified pilots. 3.5 years in maximum security. That's your fundamentals argument.
@conlan_mairead@Mark_Dee_33@DavidShoebridge The Harrier has been retired by everyone who had it. Britain retired theirs. The US Marines retired theirs. The F-35B replaced it. China isn't acquiring a plane nobody makes anymore. This argument is now defending a prosecution based on a jet that no longer exists.
@conlan_mairead@Mark_Dee_33@DavidShoebridge Civil aviation β exactly. You're describing transferable fundamentals. We're talking about platform-specific military doctrine for a jet China doesn't operate, on a carrier that didn't exist, taught by someone a decade out. Those aren't the same conversation.