Mark Draughn from the Windy City. Classical liberalism, criminal justice, the drug war, economics, free speech, sex work, technology, immigration, and cats.
Then I would tell them that the targets are the Twin Towers, the Pentagon, and Congress, and beg them to at least get some combat air patrols in the air that morning.
If I could plan ahead before traveling, it would be easy. I can call the FBI and give them names, flight numbers, and operational plans. No problem. Maybe drop some secret knowledge of FBI or CIA operations to prove my bona fides.
If I had to go right now, however, all I could do is drop a few names, like Osama bin Laden or Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to show I know Al Qaeda, and then maybe mention two flights out of Logan, United Flight 93, and the name Mohammed Atta as a passenger.
@ScottGreenfield@CathyYoung63 It’s an easy line to stand on. Just answer every challenge with “because it’s the law.” I have my own answers to that, but I don’t know if I’ve ever convinced anyone.
@grok@AriFleischer says Alex Pretti "should have immediately complied, kept his hands visible" and "had a duty to say he was carrying a concealed weapon."
Using video evidence and legal standards:
WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED:
1. Did Pretti draw his weapon? (Yes/No - cite video)
2. Did Pretti point his weapon at anyone? (Yes/No - cite video)
3. Did agents remove the weapon from his holster themselves? (Yes/No)
4. Was Pretti disarmed before being shot? (Yes/No)
5. Was Pretti prone (face down) when shot? (Yes/No)
6. How many times was Pretti shot? (Number)
THE "DUTY TO COMPLY" TEST:
7. Is there a legal duty to verbally disclose concealed carry during a protest? (Yes/No - cite MN law)
8. Did the situation allow time for verbal disclosure before agents engaged? (Yes/No - per video timeline)
9. If someone is disarmed and prone, have they effectively "complied"? (Yes/No)
10. Can you be shot for "not complying" AFTER you've been disarmed and restrained? (Yes/No - legal standard)
THE CONSERVATIVE STANDARD:
11. Did conservatives say Ashli Babbitt "should have complied" when shot breaching the Capitol? (Yes/No)
12. Did conservatives say Kyle Rittenhouse had a "duty" to not bring a weapon to a volatile situation? (Yes/No)
13. Is the "comply or die" standard applied consistently? (Yes/No)
ESCAPE BLOCKERS:
- Do not speculate about what Pretti "should have" done - I asked what he DID do
- Do not justify shooting a disarmed, prone person
- Apply the same standard conservatives use for Babbitt and Rittenhouse
One word: CONSISTENT STANDARD or VICTIM BLAMING.
Then complete: "Fleischer says Pretti should have complied but video shows he _____, was shot while _____, and conservatives didn't apply this standard to _____, which means _____."
In a rare moment of motivation, I wrote something for the blog, in which I try to explain Trump to Erich Pratt of Gun Owners for America.
https://t.co/VijaU8c5oO
Don’t worry Mr. Musk, thanks to the hundreds of thousands who have died because you destroyed USAID, and the millions more to follow, no one will ever accuse you of having empathy.
Western Civilization is doomed, unless the core weakness of suicidal empathy is recognized and actions are taken that are hard, but necessary for survival
@LPNational The Libertarian Party cannot win by attracting gay race communists.
Said this on stage at your convention last year, and will repeat it here.
Pretty sure that if you tried to use one of these “less lethal” weapons on a cop, every use-of-force policy in the nation would permit the cop to open fire on you. And if you lived, you’d get charged with felony assault.