Two modes of evolution denial:
Woke anti-hereditarians love to use the strawman argument that hereditarians must assume races are discrete. (No, divergent populations are not discrete.)
Creationist anti-hereditarians love to assert species are entirely discrete.
By late teens, the IQ correlation of children with their adoptive parents who raised them is ~0. The IQ correlation with their biological parents, whom they never knew, is ~0.40.
I wish more people understood this.
1% of the population is responsible for essentially all of the violent crime
In the centuries leading up to Europe's heyday, it hanged 1% of each generation
Practically every crime beyond the most petty minor offenses were capital crimes, and that was rigorously enforced. Horse thieves, robbers, murderers, and the like faced not "probation" given to them by a pro-crime judge, but the gallows and gibbet. And they faced it for centuries, from roughly the High Middle Ages to the Georgian period (the Victorians were soft on crime compared to their ancestors)
Resultantly, serious crime mostly faded away. There are always pickpockets and serial killers, to some extent at least, but things like armed robbery can be mostly solved with consistent enough application of the gallows, as it plucks the crime genes out of the population
Because it was freed from the burden of rampant crime, Western civilization could focus on doing great and noble things instead of endlessly subsidizing a criminal underclass
We, on the other hand, have devoted every resource imaginable to subsidizing that criminal underclass that commits all the crime
2 years and 8 months ago I started a trading experiment.
I copied Nancy Pelosi’s trade with $38,000.
At the time she invested over $1.5m into Nvidia call options. Each call was $38k, she bought 50 of them. I bought one.
Within 3 months we both almost tripled our money. My $38k turned into $108k . Her $1.5m turned into $4.5m
Whether this should be legal or not I’m not sure but this method worked so I kept going.
Every time Pelosi disclosed a new trade I added more cash and copied the trade. At a certain point I got so confident she knows what she’s doing that I started doubling down on dips and buying even higher risk higher reward call options.
It worked. At a certain point she was down nearly 40% on her google calls. I bought more and instead of deep ITM calls I decided to take some OTM calls.
Within a few months that trade turned into nearly $500k in profit.
This portfolio that started as a joke, accidentally turned into the most profitable investing experience I’ve ever had.
She’s retiring her soon, I’m now tracking every single member of congress to help me come up with trade ideas.
My goal is to take this joke/portfolio to $2m by the end of the year.
I’ll continue to post everything here and if you have any questions lmk in the comments, I’ll try to answer all of them.
I used to believe in the overwhelming power of education and culture. Until I adopted a baby from abroad, and discovered as she grew up that her inherited nature was so strong that she instinctively did things common to her natal background that were almost unheard of in her adoptive culture.
India is the ultimate manifestation of the tragedy of the commons. One and a half billion people living in a pulsating, ever-growing Petri dish of near-zero social trust, in which preemptive exploitation becomes the norm: “If I don’t take the free resource now, someone else will, so I might as well take it”.
How intelligence changes with age.
-Blue: General intelligence
-Green: Crystallized intelligence (acquired knowledge and skills)
-Red: Fluid intelligence (processing speed and ability to deal with novel problems)
https://t.co/yb32wBPDPd
What was Fauci’s motive for misleading the world? That is clear as a bell: he had spent decades championing the idea that gain-of-function research on risky viruses was a good idea, even as others expressed serious doubts.
Specifically, Fauci’s NIAID funded the work on coronaviruses, first at the University of North Carolina, and then in Wuhan.
Fauci himself knew this by 23 January 2020, when an email was sent with the following subject: ‘Urgent for Dr Fauci: China’s lab for studying SARS and Ebola is in Wuhan, the outbreak’s centre’, which discussed the grant NIAID had given the intermediary body, EcoHealth Alliance, to fund the work in Wuhan.
So Fauci knew from then onwards that if a lab leak looked plausible, his own role in godfathering the research would come out.
He had to keep a lid on it for a few weeks until the outbreak petered out.
Only it did not peter out.
Hayek on the left’s appropriation of the term ‘liberal’:
“I am still puzzled why those in the United States who truly believe in liberty should not only have allowed the left to appropriate this almost indispensable term but should even have assisted by beginning to use it themselves as a term of opprobrium.”
“This seems to be particularly regrettable because of the consequent tendency of many true liberals to describe themselves as conservatives.”