@freyfrigg@otsleeel@isource_news > Says she was right despite getting proven wrong multiple times.
> Making things up.
>Name calling and more seething.
Cope.
>Claims I write long posts (because of how many incorrect statements and contradictions you have made)
>Claims I have no, "logic brain," when you have achieved only digging yourself deep in a hole.
>Still hasn't addressed half a dozen contradictions.
>Insults me like a high IQ individual would when they are losing an argument.
>Unlike you, I don't insult women.
Seethe.
Cope.
@freyfrigg@otsleeel@isource_news > Brings up a point everyone already agrees with to get a gotcha moment.
>Completely ignores previous 6 contradictions.
>Claims selfies are the reason the plane crashed.
> Mocks an event with 9 loves lost and has the audacity to call others evil.
Cope.
>Shamelessly lies in front of everyone claiming it wasn't evil while saying it was.
>Shamelessly lies that she was referring to flight selfies and not on the plane while it was crashing.
>Says it was the pilots decision like they wanted to kill themselves and others.
>Seemingly proves my point of hate/jealousy due to the sheer ridiculousness of your logic.
Seethe.
Cope.
@freyfrigg@otsleeel@isource_news > doesn't understand the concept of accidents like it was intentional.
>Resorts to supporting mocking instead of helpful discussions.
>She's somehow evil but your not for mocking her.
Cope
Respond or delete your comment. Talking about someone taking selfies while the plane is crashing doesn't sound like addressing professionalism. Or keep it up so the world sees you and your thoughts on that amazing lady, how many 20 year olds do we see overachieving nowadays, so much that it caused their death. But let's talk about selfies which every single one of the new generation does if you had some none biased brain.
There might not be another tweet on this website that's puts the situation so well, very true.
I even fantasized for a moment that if she survived a few hundred more hours she could make it to commercial airliners that have up to 4 pilots, is safer in air, more rigorous/ scrutinized procedures or training, less focused on profits as they are not small companies serving individual millionaires/billionaires.
A 30 year pilot veteran on here told me: pilots will make the same mistakes 10 times but they get caught on the 11th eventually. Thanks for your thoughts and information.
@CochiAtl@SquirrelNebula@RR_605@DOCLOAN1@EV_Trapper Also check this out same pilot. The company and main pilot are also jokes for keeping her or at least not training her more. Probably because she was pretty.
Read below replies too, so many things to consider. Also don't forget the damn company that hired the sweetheart and she had a similar situation on May 6th and almost wrecked the plane then too.
</p>— Winter Spring Ws (@WinterSpringWs) <a href="https://t.co/Mr9gVYPrzs">November 7, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://t.co/AbWMiMvArM" charset="utf-8"></script>
Damn this is sad she did it for them when she asked to climb. When the plane started climbing 2000 feet they were doomed. 95 percent of storm escapes happen when planes stay straight I'll find an image down below:
Also business jets are greatly weaker in structure vs commercial planes, (50 times heavier) almost like a cruise ship vs a fishing boat. Commercial planes avoid storms like the plague with a corporate policy of 20 miles, whilst having the ability to brave almost any turbulence. Therefore I never understood the confidence of the business jet pilots.
700 feet of turbulence is like half an empire state building when the average turbulence is 10 - 40 feet. Also never forget pressure of time, people, gas, jobs are on the line, sometimes people get overconfident. Commercial airliners are more lenient when it comes to safety.
Sources: I am in a part 61 flight school currently
>Completely misses the point of my comment.
There is accountability and then their is mockery.
No one denies she wasn't wrong. There's about a few dozen factors that contributed which I covered in other posts, but it all comes down to the two pilots. If you want I will link them for you.
@OSIXXERO Looked a million times better before. This sickness must stop. I would get on all fours and lick the tiles she standing on for that first one.
Cochiloco, I think it comes down to: how often did Nathalie text her boyfriend about turbulence. If it was just this one time, then that means it was extra-ordinary and life threatening. Absolutely her fault if that was the case as she should have interjected. If she did it very often, then it's nothing more than unimportance. I believe it was the former, what are your thoughts?