튀르키예 반 호수 기슭에 어울릴 것 같지 않은 셋이 모였다. 여우와 고양이와 까치. 누가 먼저 왔는지는 모르지만, 아무도 자리를 피하지 않았다. 서로 다른 언어로 살아온 것들이 같은 풍경 안에 자연스럽게 머물렀다. '옛날 옛적에...'로 시작하는 이야기의 첫 장면 같다.
You have noticed that too. Google Search is getting worse. The results look professional but say nothing. The answers are longer but less useful. Every page reads like it was written by the same voice.
You thought Google was broken. It is not broken. It is being replaced.
Researchers published a paper at the ACM Web Conference 2026 proving what is happening. They call it Retrieval Collapse.
Here is the mechanism in one sentence. AI-generated content is flooding the internet so fast that search engines are now showing you mostly AI-written pages. And the search engine cannot tell the difference.
They ran a controlled experiment. They started with a pool of real, human-written web pages. Then they gradually added AI-generated content until it made up 67% of the pool.
By that point, over 80% of the top search results were AI-generated. Not 67%. Over 80%. The ranking algorithm did not just let AI content in. It preferred it. The AI-written pages were better optimized, more fluent, and more keyword-rich than the human pages. They outranked the originals.
Here is the part that makes this invisible.
Answer accuracy stayed the same. The search results still looked correct. The information was still technically right. If you measured quality by accuracy alone, nothing appeared wrong.
But source diversity collapsed. Nearly every result came from the same type of content. AI-written. AI-optimized. AI-structured. The human-written pages, the ones with original reporting, personal experience, and genuine expertise, were buried.
The researchers describe a two-stage collapse. Stage one is Dominance. High-quality AI content silently takes over the top results. Everything looks fine. Accuracy is stable. Nobody notices. Stage two is Corruption. Once AI dominates the pipeline, adversarial and low-quality content starts slipping through. By then, the system is too dependent on synthetic sources to course-correct.
A separate analysis found that 74.2% of newly published web pages now contain AI-generated content. Organic click-through rates on pages with AI summaries have dropped 61%. The human internet is being outranked by the machine internet.
Model Collapse described what happens when AI trains on AI. The models get dumber. Retrieval Collapse describes what happens when search engines index AI. The results get emptier.
Both are happening right now. At the same time. And neither one looks broken from the outside.
The search engine still returns ten blue links. The links still load. The pages still answer your question. But the thing that used to make those answers trustworthy, a human who actually knew something, is being quietly replaced by a machine that sounds like it does.
다음 대선 전에 지선도 총선도 있지만 24년 총선 녹색정의당 비례도, 22년 대선 심상정 후보도 모두 2%대 득표다. 대선 토론 자리에서 심상정, 권영국이라는 인물을 통해 들려왔던 목소리는 언제든 사라질 수 있다는 뜻이다.
누구를 찍느냐는 자유지만, 어떤 표가 사표라는 말은 쉽게 하지 말자.
오늘 TV토론에 어지간한 여론조사에서는 '기타 후보'로 분류해서 이름조차 호명하지 않는 권영국 후보의 자리가 있었던 이유는 22년 지선에서 정의당이 광역비례 3% 이상을 득표했기 때문이다. 이번 선거에서 권영국 후보가 3% 이상 득표해야 다음 대선에도 이 목소리에 자리가 주어진다.