wiseDom66

Redpill - A philosophy of seeing things as they truly are.
Dom - The natural order.
Life is risk. Embrace it.

[wiseDom66 @wiseDom66]

⚠️⚠️⚠️WARNING⚠️⚠️⚠️
My Tweets are intended for Mature audiences only.
Will contain Truth Bombs, anti-narrative, Free Speech, Redpill, sex, nudity, BDSM, PUA, D/s, etc.
Viewer Discretion Advised.
⚠️⚠️⚠️🤯🤯🤯⚠️⚠️⚠️

[Jean-François Gariépy 🧬 @JFGariepy]

It's quite simple, we have to put a 1-year statutory deadline on rape claims.

You don't report to the police within 1 year, the rape doesn't exist. Not a text message to your bestie. The police.

The problem with these retroactive rape claims is that they defy probability.

Why is it that men can go on for years without issue, and then when they become politicians or too influential, suddenly 14 women show up, all coordinated to take them down, at the exact moment where the powers that be want them down?

Here, it becomes even more mathematically ludicrous as we are supposed to believe that two men separately engaged in independent rape streaks without issues, then out of pure randomness, a dozen rape/assault victims show up more than a decade later at the same exact moment for both, and also out of pure randomness at the exact moment a bunch of NGOs wanted the two of them down.

It's like when Julian Assange suddenly got accused of rape when the authorities wanted to catch him for journalism. There are co-occurences that are so strong they challenge the null hypothesis instantly. Now imagine Julian Assange had a cousin and the cousin also randomly got charged for rape on that same day. Even more unlikely, imagine the rape claims were from a decade earlier. This is the unlikelihood burden you must accept in order to believe these accusations.

The purpose of a system is what it does. The system simply wanted the Tates to be in jail. The claims materialized to fill that demand.

Did rough sex occur? Who cares. We can't have men living with a sword of Damocles over their head that says: "If you ever speak your mind about this or that, the rough sex could suddenly become a rape."

Statutory limit extensions on rape are one of the important fights led by feminists in the last two decades, and the Tate brothers are the exact examples of why it was so important to them. We've heard the feminists defend this on the pretext that "sometimes victims are just too ashamed to talk."

Their dream world is this: every woman induces and requests rough sex. 99% of the guys end up being nobodies so they don't get annoyed. But groups with money come in to fund, push and "support" these "victims" when the guys accumulate too much power and become part of the 1%.

Feminists love sexual liberation combined with anti-rape puritanism because they see memories of rough sex as money in the bank and future tools to play whack-a-mole with free men, who they see as escaped slaves.

Understand this: there is no such thing as free thought, free market or free speech as long as we live on this matriarchal plantation.

[Dustin @r0ck3t23]

Elon Musk just spent seventeen billion dollars to make every cell tower on Earth a relic.

Musk: “It will allow SpaceX to deliver high bandwidth connectivity directly from the satellites to the phones.”

Not through towers. Not through cables. Not through any infrastructure on the ground.

Directly from orbit to the phone in your pocket.

For over a century, connectivity followed the same blueprint. Build a tower. Run a cable. Expand the network one piece of ground at a time.

Coverage went where the money was. Where the population density justified the investment.

Everywhere else got silence.

Four billion people still don’t have reliable internet.

Not because the technology doesn’t exist. Because no one could justify building a tower where they live.

Connectivity was never a technology problem. It was a geography problem disguised as one.

Musk: “The phones that are able to use the spectrum that was acquired probably start shipping in around two years.”

Two years. Then the phone in your hand connects straight to space.

No tower required. No carrier infrastructure between you and the signal.

The entire telecom industry was built on one assumption. That connectivity requires ground infrastructure.

Every carrier. Every contract. Every coverage map. All products of that assumption.

Starlink just bypassed it from orbit.

From orbit, every point on Earth is equidistant.

The word “remote” only exists because connectivity was built from the ground up.

From space, there is no remote. There is no coverage gap. There is no place on Earth harder to reach than any other.

The ground decides who gets connected based on where they are.

The sky doesn’t know the difference.

Human potential was always distributed evenly across the planet. Access to information never was.

The gap between those two facts is the greatest waste in human history.

We spent a century deciding who deserved access to information based on where they happened to be born.

Musk just made that question obsolete from 550 kilometers above the answer.

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

This is wild. We have been lied to about everything

We were told chicken is a health food, we’ve been told it’s what we should all be eating

According to nutrient density information by multiple sources including the USDA, it ranks nearly dead last. Here’s the order for nutrient dense meat (generally)

- Beef (especially grass-fed; high in protein, zinc, iron, B vitamins, creatine)
- Lamb (often tops lists for nutrient density per serving; excellent fats, minerals, B vitamins)
- Bison (very lean, high protein, strong mineral profile; frequently #1 or #2 vs. others)
- Venison (lean, nutrient-packed game meat; high vitamins/minerals per calorie)
- Fish (varies: fatty fish like salmon excel in omega-3s; high in protein/selenium)
- Pork (good protein/minerals but often ranks below ruminants; varies by cut)

And all the way at the bottom is chicken:

- Chicken is excellent for lean protein but generally much lower in key micronutrients and fats compared to all the above

We have been lied to about everything

One of the big reason we switched from mainly eating mainly beef and other meats is marketing from major companies like Tyson

Chicken was historically more of a delicacy or seasonal food in the US, not everyday staple like beef or pork. Mid-20th century campaigns by companies like Tyson and others successfully repositioned it as a cheap, healthy, everyday “lean protein” alternative

Marketing played a major role in shifting consumer habits, emphasizing health and nutrition angles while industrial production scaled up dramatically. This was classic marketing to expand market share

You should be upset

[wiseDom66 @wiseDom66]

@MurrayHillGuy1 It seems that way because it's true.
Women have usually given up on the relationship long before it's over. The signs are always there.
Then they have a thousand excuses why they moved on so quickly.
Women do not live with honor and loyalty.

[Dustin @r0ck3t23]

Yann LeCun just told the most well-funded industry in human history it is solving the wrong problem.

LeCun: “Babies learn this around the age of eight or nine months, that objects don’t float, they fall.”

No dataset. No labels. No reward signal.

A nine month old drops a spoon and builds a physics engine no machine can match.

LeCun: “Most of us can learn to drive in about 20 or 30 hours of training without ever crashing, causing any accident.”

Twenty hours.

Tesla has built the most capable driving system on the road. It took billions of miles of data to get there. A sixteen year old gets there over a long weekend.

Not because the teenager is the better driver.

Because the teenager is not learning to drive. They are deploying a model of reality they have been building since birth.

LeCun: “If we drive next to a cliff, we know that if we turn the wheel to the right, the car is going to run off the cliff and nothing good is going to come out of this.”

You simulate the crash. You see the wreckage. You feel the fall. You turn the wheel.

None of it was real. All of it was intelligence.

Every AI has to crash a thousand times to learn what you imagined once and never did.

That is not a performance gap. That is an architecture gap.

LeCun: “The main problem we need to solve is how do we learn models of the world.”

Not bigger models. Not more compute. Not another trillion tokens.

World models. A machine that can run reality forward before it acts.

The industry is scaling language.

LeCun says language is a compression of thought. Not thought itself.

You understood gravity before you could say the word.

You grasped cause and effect before your first sentence.

The deepest intelligence you will ever possess was built in total silence.

And every lab on Earth is trying to reconstruct the mind from words alone.

Physics does not care about your context window.

A baby who learns that cups fall in a kitchen already knows that rocks fall off cliffs. No retraining. No fine-tuning. One model. Every environment.

That is what intelligence actually is.

Not prediction. Not pattern matching. Not scale.

A simulation of reality so precise you rehearse the future before it exists.

Every infant on Earth builds one.

No machine ever has.

[wiseDom66 @wiseDom66]

@KaitWillett This applies to women everywhere. Not just the gym.

[Dustin @r0ck3t23]

Elon Musk just proved every sighted person on Earth is blind.

Your eye captures 0.0035% of the electromagnetic spectrum.

You are not seeing the universe. You are seeing the sliver your biology decided was enough to keep you alive.

That was never vision. That was a survival filter bolted onto your perception four hundred million years ago.

No one has ever removed it.

Musk: “Blindsight will enable those who have total loss of vision to be able to see again. Including if they have lost their eyes, or the optic nerve.”

No eyes. No nerve. The entire optical system physically absent from the skull.

Neuralink does not rebuild what broke.

It routes around biology entirely. It streams synthetic signal straight into the visual cortex.

Your eye never saw anything.

Your brain did.

Your brain sits in total darkness inside a vault of bone.

It has never seen the sun. It has never seen anything.

It builds reality out of whatever electrical signal the eye allows through.

The eye is the bottleneck between your mind and the universe.

Neuralink removes the bottleneck.

Musk: “Maybe have never seen, were even blind from birth.”

A human who has never perceived a single photon of light.

Given sight for the first time.

Not through medicine. Through engineering.

Musk: “You can see in radar, you can see in infrared, ultraviolet.”

Infrared is pouring off every surface in the room around you.

Radio waves are passing through your body right now.

Ultraviolet is painting patterns across everything you have ever looked at.

You cannot see any of it.

Your biology locked you out before you were born.

Musk: “Superhuman capabilities.”

The person born blind would not be restored to human sight.

They would see more of the universe than any sighted person who has ever lived.

The blind would out-see the sighted.

You will not pity them.

You will envy them.

Musk: “Cybernetic enhancement.”

Every human sense is a sensor converting the world into electrical signal.

Replace the sensor and the brain does not care where the signal came from.

It just processes.

Your senses were never built to show you reality. They were built to show you just enough of it to survive.

Evolution built a keyhole. We called it sight.

Elon Musk is not fixing blindness.

He is fixing sight.

[PhilVanes @PhilVanes2]

@TheGarlandNixon What never ceases to amaze me are the people who now know for an absolute fact that they were lied to about Vietnam, Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and Gaza but they are more than happy to believe exactly the same people telling them exactly the same bollocks about Russia/Iran/China

[Matthew Horncastle @matt_horncastle]

I Put an Opinion on My Own Billboard. The State Referred Me to Police.

Here is what I did.

I put political speech on my own digital billboard on Moorhouse Ave in Christchurch.

The message was simple: do not vote for Labour, the Greens or Te Pāti Māori.

It ran for a short time period, on an unrented screen, at no cost to anyone.

There was no secret donor.
There was no hidden campaign.
There was no political machine.

It was me, expressing my opinion, on my billboard.

The billboard also said:

“Approved by Matthew Horncastle.”

Then three people complained to the New Zealand Electoral Commission.

The Commission emailed me on 3 June and 17 June 2026 asking for a response. Those emails went to my junk folder. I never saw them.

Without ever actually reaching me, the Commission referred me to Police on 3 July 2026.

Then it published a public statement saying my billboards “did not contain promoter statements” at all.

That statement is false.

The billboards did contain the words “Approved by Matthew Horncastle.”

The Commission’s own referral letter admits that. Their actual allegation is that the billboard did not include separate contact details.

That is a completely different issue.

So a government body publicly misstated the facts about a private citizen, referred that citizen to Police, and did all of this over political speech.

That should concern every New Zealander.

My concern is now much bigger than a billboard.

I am concerned the Electoral Commission has been compromised by people with left-wing values who are hostile to right-wing speech and free speech.

If the Commission is neutral, the documents will show that.

If it is not, the public deserves to know.

That is why I have filed a formal OIA and Privacy Act request demanding the complaints, the internal assessment, the full referral package sent to Police, proof of contact attempts, and referral statistics since 2023.

The Electoral Commission does not own political debate.

The state does not own my billboard.
The state does not own my opinion.
The state does not own my speech.

A free country requires citizens who are allowed to criticise political parties.

I intend to get to the bottom of this.

[Brian Tamaki @BrianTamakiNZ]

THEY’RE TAKING MY GUNS TO PLEASE MODI!

The moment I opened the Firearms Safety Authority’s letter, one thing smacked me right between the eyes – they can’t stop talking about the Prime Minister of India!

Modi this. Modi that. Modi four times in one letter! While they’re trying to rip my firearms licence away, all they care about is saving face for Modi and keeping that Free Trade Agreement alive. They don’t actually think I’m a danger with a gun. Nah. They’re terrified I’ve embarrassed their special guest.

Here’s Inspector Glenn Nalder’s own words – straight from the page:

1. “You published a video speaking about the PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA…”
2. “You claim the PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA is killing Christians…”
3. “You claim the PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA is covering mass rapes of little girls…”
4. And again: “The PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA is killing Christians…”

Five points total. Four of them mention Modi.

It’s not a firearms notice – it’s a diplomatic love letter!

I’ll be fighting every single one of these points tooth and nail.

But let me ask the real questions that every Kiwi should be asking:

▪️ Why is the Indian Prime Minister the star of a New Zealand gun licence decision?
▪️ Why is my political opinion about a foreign leader and country now a matter for the Firearms Safety Authority?
▪️ And why is this all exploding right when Modi’s flying in and the FTA deal is hanging by a thread?

Coincidence? Yeah right.

Is this foreign interference?
We all remember when our young men did the haka and stopped those Sikh parades…the Indian government wrote straight to our government putting the pressure on.

Now here we are again.
Is the Indian government applying pressure again?
It’s not too far-fetched to believe that they are.

The New Zealand Government and Police are bending over backwards to protect a leader whose country is committing human rights violations:
▪️ Slaughtering and purging Christians
▪️ Burning churches to the ground
▪️ Raping and abusing Christian girls
▪️ Pushing child brides
▪️ Running non-conversion laws
▪️ Still drowning in child labour

Enough!

This isn’t about my guns.
This isn’t about threats.
This isn’t about unsafe firearm handling.

This is about words. My words. Political words. Passionate words.

Words that sparked a national firestorm about free speech, mass immigration, and the future of our country.

Whether you love me or hate me…every New Zealander better wake up.

If they can take your guns for speaking your mind, they can take your voice next.

Passionate speech is not hate speech.
Free speech is only real when it’s unpopular.

And I will never, ever shut up.

I’ll keep standing.
I’ll keep speaking.
I’ll keep fighting for every single Kiwi’s right to say what needs to be said – without the government crawling up India’s backside to silence you.

These questions deserve answers, New Zealand.
And I’m not going anywhere. I'm here for it.

[wiseDom66 @wiseDom66]

@kiwiwayne3 I consciously switch to "this person is a sheep" mode... And I start picturing this image. 🤣

[DreamFudge @dream_fudge]

@downbadcomment Women just don't understand that the moment you cheat on your man and take strange 🍆 you immediately mean nothing to him. That's why he walks away. What was once everything to him is now meaningless to him. FACT

[Brian Tamaki @BrianTamakiNZ]

THE RIGHT TO SPEAK. THE COURAGE TO STAND.

I'm fighting to protect Free Speech in New Zealand.

I'm fighting for the right to have an honest National Conversation about mass immigration without assimilation, what religions, cultures and customs are compatible with New Zealand, and whether we are a Christian nation.

I've had plenty of media interview requests over the past few days. I don't accept every invitation, but I keep fronting up because these conversations matter.

I know they won’t give me a fair platform. Some are hoping to paint me as the villain, like Ryan Bridge & Heather du Plessis-Allan. I know they'll use only sound bites to try make me look bad, and they rarely give me the opportunity to answer their questions or fully explain my position.

But I keep saying yes. Because Free Speech matters.

I continue to give the media chance after chance to report fairly and accurately. More importantly, I trust Kiwis to watch, listen and make up their own minds.

I just hope Kiwis are discerning enough to recognise who is speaking from genuine conviction and who is simply pushing a narrative to bump up their ratings.

This has never been about hate.
This has always been about preservation.

Preserving our freedoms. Preserving the values that built this country. Preserving our Christian heritage. Preserving the Kiwi way of life for our children and grandchildren.

That's why I'll keep speaking up.

Because I want to Keep New Zealand, New Zealand.

Here’s a few highlights from my interview with Ryan Bridge today…

[wiseDom66 @wiseDom66]

@nzpoliticsgroup It's pretty obvious MSM decided way before the interview that they wanted to paint @BrianTamakiNZ as crazy. Ryan said as much even though Tamaki remained calm and logical.
I don't watch MSM but made an exception in this case...just to make sure I'm still correct:
MSM LIES.

[UK, NZ Pete🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇳🇿. @Pete20221]

NZ's, The choice is clear in the up coming election.

If you want NZ on the right track, kids being educated, better growth & economy slowly improving vote Nat, Act, NZ1.

If you want the country run by the unions, unelected Wellington civil servants & radicals, vote Labour.

[🗣 Free Speech Union ✊ @NZFreeSpeech]

This morning, Free Speech Union Council Member Dane Giraud @Dane_Giraud argued in the NZ Herald that we don't need new hate speech laws to deal with Brian Tamaki. Hours later, police seized his guns. No charge. No arrest. No stated plan or threat. 

Tamaki's rhetoric was divisive and not something the Free Speech Union in anyway condones. But a power aimed today at a man no one wants to defend can tomorrow be aimed at you.

If he broke the law, charge him. If he didn't, we should all be asking who is next.

Watch Dane Giraud's full piece 👇

[Dane Giraud ✡️ @Dane_Giraud]

Whether you support Brian Tamaki and his followers or despise them is beside the point. In New Zealand, people are not supposed to lose legal rights because officials think their speech is offensive or hateful.

If someone's words amount to criminal incitement, charge them under the relevant law and let a court decide. If they don't meet that threshold, using administrative powers to punish speech sets a precedent that can be applied to anyone #FreeSpeech

[wiseDom66 @wiseDom66]

@kaiviti_cam Not fit to be a NZ politician when someone doesn't even know that @BrianTamakiNZ often speaks figuratively.

[Cam Slater @kaiviti_cam]

You know what aren't "Kiwi values" Parmjeet? Snitching and siccing cops on to people you disagree with politically.
As a result Parmjeet you've just lost the entire firearms community because of your snitching.

[wiseDom66 @wiseDom66]

@BrianTamakiNZ We all know the government is corrupt and this is just a political move to scaremonger and silence free speech.