@kirubel_mamo@James_The_Ace yeah but all the ppl you listed have spent thousands on the game they're the consumers that keep the game up they have a right to voice their opinions
@proudpyromancer@Wizard101Devs talking about spellements for pvp and it's probably even longer since you arent guaranteed 2 spellements of every school. It's just the devs trying to normalize dumping thousands of hours of peoples time down the train for subscription renewals
@FireswordJason I'm sorry but what is respectable about ki 😕 no shade to the staff they're cool ppl I dont fw the marketing team thou they ruined the game fr
@vahelala@faeriequeenss You don't have to agree with it but if you want to stop seeing pride content stop being oppressive because that's why pride exists in the first place. Let people live their own lives it's their choice entirely
@Fredthetank2000 @Band1t_0 I agree on removing roshambos bringing back all leagues bringing back tourney rewards old elo system I dont agree on every school having a broken spell or miss the lore problem thou, I've played both and I liked what I saw in 4th/early 5th age
@Band1t_0 @Fredthetank2000 and unique strategies before all the tc/itemcard bans, Also not here for jading, at this current state we have strategies that rely on your opponent not pulling a counter and winning off of that, I primarily play lower level leagues I can't speak on max
@Band1t_0 @Fredthetank2000 yeah him showing that deck was a really bad example to what it used to be, prime in my opinion was super early 5th age to where you were limited to school roshambos and hits were buffed in dmg if conditions were met, I'm not for lore spam, every school used to have more variety