BitRepo is joining Base Batches 004!
BitRepo lets a holder keep their BTC, borrow stablecoins against it, deploy those dollars into directly underwritten short-duration credit, and retain the net spread.
@felix_fan Love this, how girls reels call it in IG/tiktok? "Manifest "reality"" genre. No agenda)
Ser, you literaly have BNBop (such chain, much usecases) integration, while dont have TON dapps. TW is EVM/BNB biased. And thats easy to trace. Wen last time you ship to prod non evm updates?
@TrustWallet@entropyIO Dear intern, how about some real work? Like fix your errors with perp lists? How many more time you need to exclude NEO gas token from commodities, as well as markets, which is closed? Seems "talented". Reported back on summer. We are in autumn. @tradorrr_xbt@felix_fan
@BitcoinErrorLog@bitrefill Sorry to hear that it's removed, while cool to know who was behind that. Maybe now, as market niche is kinda less populated it's time to revamp?)
Have a great day, ser!
@tradorrr_xbt@PainBnb Make floating window with site(s) icon, you have experience with less useful ball and ai bulb in app without problem, that will be 2 less clicks for such use case and any other which need to switch between wallet/dapp. cc @felix_fan
@tradorrr_xbt@PainBnb Got occasion to retest one, better in lot of senses, but:
Ser, if I get from dapp address to send crypto and need to got back to site to see result of tx - oh, that flow is cursed( minimise site, exit search mode, go to send, back to search, then site! Wen less clicks?
@felix_fan Intresting take. So if TW will have more volume by obtaining classical bank license (it will for sure), but didn't deliver self-custody then it's ok to you as "number goes up"?
The comments here are proof that the average Joe doesn’t actually care about decentralization, immutability, or confiscation resistance.
Most people want security, or more accurately, the illusion of security. They want a government, an institution, or someone else standing above them, ready to intervene when something goes wrong.
But freedom comes with a price: responsibility.
If you truly control your money, then you also own the consequences of your decisions.
That is what makes this industry so strange. Very few people actually understand what decentralization implies, and even fewer are willing to accept it when the outcome is uncomfortable.
A censorship-resistant system does not stop because a transaction is ugly. The chain does not care who you are. Your transaction is not going to be reversed because you made a mistake. There is no customer support desk coming to save you.
Sometimes, if you fuck up, you are simply fucked.
That is terrible UX for someone who wants protection from their own mistakes.
It is perfect UX for someone who wants sovereignty over their own property.
You cannot demand sovereignty when things are going well and then demand an authority when they are not.
99% of this industry wants the aesthetics of decentralization without accepting its consequences.