@JonathanTurley Believe it or not, "investigations" should be in response to something. Or, in this case, after investigating for a couple of years, I would expect more of a case to be made than loans paid back when Biden wasn't in office and debunked agitprop from the Obama admin.
@RonFilipkowski It's interesting that free speech principles are important... when they are "free speech-ifying" about other people. When they say things about Musk, on the other hand... down comes the ban hammer.
@elleonCEOTK For people who generally believe the government can't do anything right, it surprises me that you think that it's able to handle a massive conspiracy involving hundreds of thousands of people and keep it secret from everyone other than randos on the Internet.
@JonathanTurley And there we go, with a self-serving false analogy. Car theft is not fraud. That's like saying Ponzi schemes are legal up until the point people lose money. Pro tip: they are not. Regardless of how many early investors make money.
@EndWokeness Let's be clear, not spending advertising dollars on a particular outlet is not "boycotting." That's as silly as saying that Apple is boycotting Playboy. They don't want to have their brand associated with the source. Which is -- wait for it -- capitalism in action.
@RepJamesComer Ah, I see the honorable Congressman has never heard of the term "fungible." Also, there is no "Biden family business." There are businesses run by people with the last name of Biden. And I don't plan to vote for Hunter Biden. Heck, he isn't even in government.
@JonathanTurley So this is a case of, "yes, but no." Superficially similar but in actuality very different. Because the goal is to give people the information you want them to have without nuance. Which sounds familiar.
@JonathanTurley There are reasons for closed sessions: information that shouldn't be made public or to protect the identity or privacy of the individual. Neither of which are the case, here. Hunter Biden has no classified information, is already known and wants to be public.
@LeadingReport If it's unclassified, presumably the underlying documents have been shared and are readily available. Links? Otherwise it's just another person shouting into the void.
@julie_kelly2 So, what you're saying is that only judges appointed by a particular President are -- and presumably returning judgements that are in line with your desires -- are legitimate? Political tribalism at its finest.
@Grmpyii @gtconway3d@justfetz_b As was mentioned, this is the DNC, not a government building. Nor does government property belong to individuals, collectively or not. Try making that claim at -- say -- Groom Lake and see how that goes.
@MusashiBonMot Really not sure what this meant to prove. Unfilled ballots that have clearly not been used. Which means ... what, exactly? They had more ballots than they expected? Oh, the horror.
@RepJeffries This is a little disingenuous. Whether or not you agree with the House Republicans' plans -- which, for the record, I don't -- something has to be done with entitlements. Our deficit is growing too fast and it's driven, primarily, by entitlements.
@JonathanTurley And by media you obviously aren't including the constellation of GOP aligned media. Unless you don't consider them media? I can get behind that. What shall we call them, then? Propagandists?