@RotectorUpdates@hecetacoast Dudeβs forgetting Cova retired a bit ago π
Surely this isnβt healthy. Youβre obsessing over things that were dealt with and/or changed.
You get called out and all you can say is youβre βa dumb little kidβ
@dotfihman420@fowntainwhat Hi,
We'd appreciate if you did not spread misinformation. Your account was flagged due to being in 1 condo group. This was appealed, hence you were "removed from the list".
People are entitled to their own opinions, so its understandable.
However, staff are more than happy to provide an explanation to why a flag is placed. This is the whole purpose of having "Contact staff for more info" underneath a flag.
While we may not be able to share exact evidence, we can at the very least offer an explanation.
This was already cleared up, and I think the way you're presenting it is misleading.
You don't have to trust anything I say. That's your choice. But I was under the impression you were moving on from this, especially since you asked all of us to block you so you could do that.
As for the Hunter role, I also told you it was undergoing changes, and it has.
@EmpressHuang64@RotectorUpdates@hecetacoast We've only flagged people if it's connected back to Roblox in some way.
NSFW that is based off of roblox is self explanatory.
To those who are flagged for being NSFW off twitter, its most likely due to having the same username or having it directly linked.
I think extension users need to realize the importance of this info icon that we add to "User Profile" flags. There are two sides to this. If we chose to remove these borderline reasons from flags, we would get "false negative" complaints from users, the kind we used to constantly get in the past. If we chose to keep them, we get "false positive" complaints like this instead.
Ultimately it is one of those situations where you have to pick a side. We chose to keep these borderline cases so nothing slips through, and to give users full visibility into why each one was flagged.
We also have a popup that informs every new extension user, upon finding their first flag, that a flag should be treated as a signal. That's where critical thinking is supposed to come in. Judging by most of the complaints we get, that concept seems to be in short supply.
On top of that, we added the info popover specifically to avoid this kind of confusion. But screenshots like these strip all of that context out. That info icon is there for a reason (see image).
And yes, we do see cases where users put this kind of thing in their profile specifically to avoid getting flagged. It's a common pattern, especially among ERPers who throw "MDNI" and "follows Roblox TOS" into their bio as an attempt to evade detection. The pattern is pretty obvious once you've seen it enough.
That said, if you genuinely come across a "User Profile" flag without one of these stricter evaluation icons, then yes, that's a real false positive.
@cairot12@BIoxxedz@NoahEliatrope We actively discourage harassment, even taking measures to censor attached Discord IDβs. Flags also have categories. If people just read, they can understand what we flagged someone for.
@BIoxxedz@NoahEliatrope At no point does the flag state or imply that you are a pedophile or a groomer. It is solely based on your admitted creation and distribution of RR34 content.
@BIoxxedz@NoahEliatrope Hi, I'm the agent handling your appeal.
I'm a little confused by what you mean when you refer to "vague posting." In your appeal, you acknowledged that you created and uploaded the content in question, which is why you were identified as an RR34 creator.
1/?