芝士就是力量

披星戴月走过的路，终将繁花遍地

[芝士就是力量 @xXtiff4nyXx]

@wuzupdude 我倒觉得巡航不慢点就没那个味儿了，速度快了只剩吵。

[芝士就是力量 @xXtiff4nyXx]

@kolgirl12 说是像时尚编辑我有点保留，杜卡迪的脾气一向不太斯文

[芝士就是力量 @xXtiff4nyXx]

@kolgirl12 不过油门那段描述确实戳到我了，笑

[芝士就是力量 @xXtiff4nyXx]

@makenzie1229 哈哈那肯定是毕业三年这届，青涩退了还留着底子，我就吃这口。

[芝士就是力量 @xXtiff4nyXx]

发动机顺这点最值钱,二手车其它都能修,机器状态好就成功一半

[小芽陪你学汽车 @vashaad1]

太原这台二手赛科龙旅行车像跑过很多长途的女记者，座垫已经坐得服帖，发动机却依然顺。大同、晋中、临汾想看值不值得入，主页继续。

[芝士就是力量 @xXtiff4nyXx]

城市画面的说法很准，小车上街就是比大排有生活气

[小葵带你逛汽车世界 @tpacompanions]

日照今天骑Vespa踏板，像精致法式轻熟女，车身小巧，城市里特别有画面。青岛、临沂、烟台想看完整通勤体验，主页继续。

[芝士就是力量 @xXtiff4nyXx]

@nillakid 方向轻这点我真有共鸣，之前骑重车掉头掉半天

[芝士就是力量 @xXtiff4nyXx]

@Jesse_M_Guzman 补个点，坐高和脚踏位置决定低速心里有没有底，光看排量看不出来。

[whaley @whaleyxbt]

nobody tells you this about grok bot

one guy spent a week reading everything about @bot: 600+ posts, 300 reels, 60 hours of video, the docs.

what he found:

> all your bots share ONE computer - same files, same cookies, same logins

> a 15-min routine = 96 runs a day. one hourly routine "can use a week of usage in a day"

> the terminal is a back door: type claude, log in your own Claude Code, drive it from your phone

plus 3 things xAI hid on purpose.

the full list, with every source, is in his article below 👇

[Mr. Buzzoni @Mr_Buzzoni]

Claude Code tip: once Opus 5.5 is your main model, stop letting your Fable 5.1 quota go to waste

put it on call with /advisor

run /advisor fable

Opus 5.5 does all the building
Fable 5.1 follows the session in the background and cuts in three times:

-> before a plan: does this hold up?
-> when one error keeps returning: am I fixing the wrong thing?
-> before "done": what slipped through?

Fable 5.1 checks the direction. Opus 5.5 does the typing

Jev engineering takes it one step further:
the small forks (which file, which tool, retry or stop) go to Jev in under half a second, so the pricey models only see the calls that can change the result

where this setup pays off most right now: long reverse engineering runs with REA, the open source MCP that lets Opus 5.5 take any app apart down to the binary

• the full setup
> Opus 5.5 on high drives the main session
> subagent one reads the code
> subagent two edits and runs tests
> subagent three checks the docs
> all three on medium
> Fable 5.1 on call

give Claude Code the tree plus this prompt 👇

"Configure Claude Code to match this tree:

1. Reuse suitable subagents from ~/.claude/agents and .claude/agents.

> Draft new ones only where a role is missing
> Give each model: opus, effort: medium
> List any that pin another model and leave them

2. Set main session effort to high with effortLevel in ~/.claude/settings.json

3. Look for env vars that turn off the advisor (CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_ADVISOR_TOOL, DISABLE_TELEMETRY, anything that blocks flag fetching) and CLAUDE_CODE_EFFORT_LEVEL, which overrides subagent effort. Report them and leave them be

4. Add a rule to ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md: check with the advisor before a big plan, when an error repeats, and before marking a long task done

Show me the changes first, edit nothing until I confirm."

↳ https://t.co/pkgl3RZv47

[RazeDen @razeden0]

i just took apart photoshop with REA + opus 5.5... i was paying $275.88 a year for 4 buttons. now they live in a 212 KB app

REA takes it apart. opus 5.5 explains only my 4 buttons. claude code rebuilds them. i make thumbnails

photoshop → REA maps every function → opus 5.5 reads only my 4 tools → claude code rebuilds → 40 test images against the original

REA found 14,862 functions inside photoshop. opus 5.5 doesn't touch most of them. it only gets the 4 tools i use on every thumbnail

remove background, crop to 1280x720, curves, export under 2 MB. that's it. that's my whole photoshop

those 4 tools sit on 286 functions, read in 31 minutes for $9.73. 148 of them are behind 1 button - remove background

reading those by hand at 25 minutes each is 119h 10m. people would say 100x faster. i did the math and it's 231x

that's $0.034 per function, and every answer says what the button does, where the proof is, and what's still a guess

last night claude code rebuilt all 4 in 3h 12m. i ran 40 old thumbnails through both. 37 out of 40 came out the same

the other 3 had worse hair edges. my app opens in 0.8 seconds, photoshop took 14

the big mistake: giving opus 5.5 the whole photoshop. you pay the smartest model to read 14,862 functions and say "that's a 3d menu" 14,576 times

it doesn't rebuild photoshop. it rebuilds my 4 buttons. for anything else i'd still open the real one

setup took me 11 minutes: one REA command, photoshop already on my pc, opus 5.5 inside claude code, and 40 old thumbnails as tests

REA maps, opus 5.5 explains, claude code rebuilds what the button does - never a line of adobe's code

everyone pays adobe for 1,000 tools. i rebuilt the 4 i use - $22.99 a month, $275.88 a year back ↓

[RazeDen @razeden0]

i just built an army of 500 Haiku 5.5 agents and made Opus 5.5 the general

Anthropic dropped Haiku 5.5 yesterday. it costs 75% less than Haiku 4.5

everyone saw a cheaper chatbot. i saw cheap soldiers

so i split the roles:

Opus 5.5 = the general. plans, decides, checks
Haiku 5.5 = the army. reads, sorts, summarizes

1 task → Opus cuts it into 500 pieces → 500 Haiku run at once → Opus merges the answer

first mission: read 10,000 pages of SEC filings from NVIDIA, Tesla, Apple, Microsoft and Google

a Goldman Sachs analyst: 3 weeks
Opus 5.5 alone: 6 hours, $412
my army: 11 minutes, $9

i did the math. 45x cheaper. 32x faster

the big mistake: people make Opus do everything

that's like paying Jensen Huang to sort your mail

setup took 14 minutes in Claude Code. one prompt, one subagent file

OpenAI and Google are fighting to build the smartest model

the money is in the cheapest one that never gets tired

also i do same thing with Grok + Jev, check it out in article below ↓

[芝士就是力量 @xXtiff4nyXx]

@NFL clouds are eating into the timing, missed the peak again

[芝士就是力量 @xXtiff4nyXx]

@razeden0 chasing the same 20-minute window every evening, no regrets

[芝士就是力量 @xXtiff4nyXx]

@Mr_Buzzoni I drove forty minutes for a sky worse than this

[芝士就是力量 @xXtiff4nyXx]

I am sitting here nothing :( bored