Age of Strife Xenos Arc

[Age of Strife Xenos Arc @xenosanon]

@WodenWanderer Watch out for those dogs, those evildoers, those mutilators of the flesh.
Philippians 3:2

[Age of Strife Xenos Arc @xenosanon]

@wideawake_media >The UK government

A mafia network of criminal traitors

[Age of Strife Xenos Arc @xenosanon]

@Truthpole

[Age of Strife Xenos Arc @xenosanon]

@typesfast They tell us their plans

Possibly because according to their beliefs they have to

[Age of Strife Xenos Arc @xenosanon]

@teslaxryan I worry about a false flag

[BEYOND THE VEIL @beyond_theveil1]

Trump's former spiritual advisor, Robert Morris, has officialy joined the the Black Eye Club.

[Age of Strife Xenos Arc @xenosanon]

@bitcoins1stlady Don't really want to worship the beast of revelation
https://t.co/nIr9SQilZx

[Age of Strife Xenos Arc @xenosanon]

@RabbiJeffx @grok >orphans and babies

They target them

[Bruno @BrunoRoalv]

La Tercera Guerra Mundial no va a empezar con un comunicado avisándonos de que empieza mañana.

Pero mirad lo que está ocurriendo en Europa.

🇩🇪 Alemania prepara su sistema sanitario para un escenario de hasta 1.000 militares heridos al día.

🇵🇱🇱🇹 Polonia y Lituania trabajan en planes de evacuación masiva de población ante un posible conflicto.

🇸🇪🇩🇪 Suecia y Alemania ensayan el despliegue rápido de 1.500 soldados en Gotland, en pleno Báltico.

🇫🇮 Finlandia alerta a su población sobre sabotajes, drones y posibles ataques contra infraestructuras.

🇱🇻 Letonia prepara protocolos para responder inmediatamente ante incursiones sin esperar decisiones colectivas de la OTAN.

🇨🇭 Suiza acaba de aprobar una nueva estrategia de seguridad y defensa ante el deterioro de la situación europea.

🇬🇧 Reino Unido pide a la población estar preparada con reservas domésticas de comida y agua para emergencias.

🇱🇺 Luxemburgo tuvo que cerrar temporalmente su aeropuerto por drones no identificados.

Y todo esto mientras Europa acelera su rearme y sus dirigentes hablan cada vez con más naturalidad de prepararse para un posible enfrentamiento con Rusia.

La pregunta no es si la guerra empieza mañana. La pregunta que debería acojonarnos es otra:

¿Por qué están preparando a media Europa para asumir psicológica, económica y militarmente que una guerra con Rusia puede ocurrir?

Porque las guerras no empiezan cuando aparece el primer tanque.

Empiezan mucho antes, cuando lo que ayer era absolutamente impensable empieza a parecernos normal.

[Korobochka (コロボ) 🇦🇺✝️🇷🇺 @cirnosad]

On 9/11, the Pentagon was struck by a Soviet nuclear cruise missile, the P700 Granit. Not an airliner.

Find out why by following this thread.

Retweet to change history.

[Age of Strife Xenos Arc @xenosanon]

@sovereignbrah Is it merely fear-mongering... or is it foreshadowing?

What if a false-flag is planned and they're positioning themselves?

[Age of Strife Xenos Arc @xenosanon]

@mandyarthur @grok John 8:44
https://t.co/nIr9SQiTP5

[Age of Strife Xenos Arc @xenosanon]

@RabbiJeffx @grok >orphans and babies

They target them

[Age of Strife Xenos Arc @xenosanon]

@RabbiJeffx @grok >orphans and babies

They target them

[Age of Strife Xenos Arc @xenosanon]

@amuse AI is the perfect scapegoat because it can't deny accusations.

A false flag is the perfect opportunity for the government to seize more power and to build the beast system.

[Korobochka (コロボ) 🇦🇺✝️🇷🇺 @cirnosad]

The ☢️ Missile Strike at the Pentagon on 9/11 /🧵

What really struck the WTC on 9/11? We've already eliminated airplanes as an option, which is a shock to anyone who lived through that day. We now have video evidence of not inserted planes in all footage of 9/11, but also the removal of another object. What the hell was that that "ball" like object?

Could it also be a composite? A deeper fake, so to speak? Is there any clue that could possible eliminate all other options? It's a ridiculous thought but, given what we experienced, we shouldn't make any assumptions and only work with what is real, provable and observable.

The real challenge of answering such a question is that the two world trade centres turned to dust, destroying the scene of the crime and most of the evidence with it. But we aren't out of luck, as another building was struck on 9/11:

The Pentagon.

Though there was obviously no wreckage of an aircraft on the scene, there is enough evidence in the Pentagon for us to determine not only what couldn't have struck it, but the only object in the world that could have struck it and left the damage that it did.

Unlike the strikes on the WTC, there was no televised composite film of a plane striking the pentagon, simply because the scenario required was physically impossible. The plane supposedly banked to achieve cruise speed at ground level and struck the Pentagon parallel to the ground. There is a very slow and low quality surveillance video that depicts this strike (which we will examine shortly). Yet, just from the satellite photos of the Pentagon, we can determine the actual damage.

So, let's examine three pieces of evidence based on things that are already established and known! With these pieces of evidence we will determine what struck the Pentagon and how it's related to whatever struck the WTCs and the larger plot around 9/11!

A. Penetration Depth
================
Let's do some math based on established observations. This is going to be necessary to other objects out, though it will be overkill for a plane.

The object that struck the Pentagon struck three of its five rings:
The E-Ring, the D-Ring and finally C-Ring when it stopped. The exterior wall of the pentagon consisted of ~13 centimetres of limestone and ~20 cm of bricks. Inside the Pentagon, each wall consisted of 25 cm of brick. The distance travelled to the end of ring C is 64 meters total. Given the 6 walls penetrated, at the perpendicular, that is a total of:

* 64 meters travelled after impact.
* 130mm of limestone
* 1580mm of bricks
* Six impact impulses

Even though the individual walls are not very thick or strong, that's a huge amount of material to eat through and that's at 90 degrees. And a very long distance from the first site of impact. If you measure the two visible impact zones, you will see that the object struck the Pentagon at an angle of 70 degrees to the plane. That means we have to divide the above by sin 70deg:

- 68 meters travelled
- 138mm of limestone
- 1680mm of bricks

The object was clearly on its way to the courtyard centre of the Pentagon and whoever planned this trajectory was attempting to penetrate the building as deeply as possible without targeting anything specific within it. Incidentally, the courtyard centre of the Pentagon was (and still is) called ground zero, a name it earnt during the Cold War under the assumption that the USSR would strike exactly that location during mutually assured destruction. There is even a hotdog stand in the middle of the Pentagon affectionately called cafe ground zero for this reason.

B. Pattern of Destruction
================
Despite being struck with this object, the Pentagon outer wall did not immediately collapse. In fact, close ups show very localised destructions, albeit very strong fires. 20 minutes later, the outer wall of the Pentagon collapsed.

Another important observation was impact shape it left: it was that of a single hole that destroyed a brick pattern around ~2 meters wide. This was evidence even in the C-ring. Keep this important observation in mind.

C. The Timeline
================
Let's place the attack on the Pentagon with all the events surrounding it:

8:46:30 AM - WTC North Tower is struck.
9:03:00 AM - WTC South Tower is struck.
9:37:46 AM - Pentagon is struck.
9:55:?? AM - First responders told to evacuate Pentagon perimeter.
9:57:?? AM - Pentagon outer wall "collapses".
9:58:59 AM - South Tower pulverised.
10:03:11 AM - Object destroyed over Pennsylvania.
10:28:22 AM - North Tower pulverised.

================
This is actually all the evidence we need from the Pentagon itself so let's dive deeper into the implications that every detail left behind.

/1

[Korobochka (コロボ) 🇦🇺✝️🇷🇺 @cirnosad]

The most obvious clue to look into is the lack of an initial wall collapse, a single 2 meter hole, seemingly centred on the point of impact.

Let's suspend our disbelief for a moment and claim that an airplane struck the Pentagon. In that case, what part of the plane is most likely to impact and pierce through six walls and 1680mm of bricks? The engines of course! And if we believe this object was AA Flight 77, then it had twin Rolls-Royce RB211-535E4B engines, with casing dimensions 2.28 meters wide. These are separated by 13 meters.

These engines are not made of steel, but are made of titanium, aluminium and other light weight Kevlar aramid fibre wrapped around the casing. The rest of the plane is made of lightweight and thin aluminium alloys and would crumble like a tin can even on the relatively weak Pentagon walls.

Of course, it would be impossible for the plane to reach any kind of appreciable speed while basically skidding across the ground and that's usually when they would crash into the ground.

But there's a bigger problem here.

If the object truly was the plane, then why was there only one centred impact, rather than two holes, 13 meters apart (~13.8m compensating for angle).

Yet there is only ONE hole, centred on the approach. It is beyond impossible that this was a plane.

Furthermore, an impact causing a penetration through a wall as the engine is slowing down would cause a damage profile significantly larger than the object size that struck it. Just hit a wall with a sledgehammer and see the impact left behind, it's usually twice the size of the head. Thus we would expect roughly two ~4.5 meter hole inside the Pentagon walls, but we instead observe a single hole 3.5 meters wide* and 2.7 meters high.

Are we supposed to believe the airplane turned into an accordion and crammed its two engines together to fit snuggly through the Pentagon while leaving no impression of itself on its outer walls?

Reducto ad absurdum. This ridiculous idea, already aerodynamically impossible has died even with that granted. Therefore, just like the two world trade centres:

No plane struck the Pentagon either!!!!

[* To correct the previous post, with the official figures anyway.]

[Hannibal999 @Hannibal9972485]

The United States 🇺🇸 is arming the data center owners with military-grade weapons systems. BLACKROCK is trying to embed its data centers into military installations.

legislation is being introduced that would give private corporations military-grade weapons systems to protect their data centers, which are being built by companies like BlackRock, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta.👀🚨

the government is privatizing military enforcement authority over national airspace and transferring it to corporate actors who own data centers. The "critical infrastructure" designation is the mechanism - once DHS designates a data center as critical infrastructure, the owner gets military weapons.👀🚨

Billionaires are PRIVATIZING the UNITED STATES 🇺🇸 military that taxpayers pay for , so they can FORCIBLY cause pollution, raise energy prices, deplete natural resources, pull tax dollars from local needs, and the largest centers are owned by a handful of companies and the Government is giving them military-grade weapons systems to protect those data centers 👀🚨

https://t.co/4v3Tnj2Bmd

https://t.co/pSmb6CEuUt

[Age of Strife Xenos Arc @xenosanon]

@yacineMTB They have already announced that they will create and release a bioweapon

[Age of Strife Xenos Arc @xenosanon]

@nic_carter >fearmongering
It's an announcement.
They openly tell us their intentions.

[Nicolas Hulscher, MPH @NicHulscher]

The same AI company (Anthropic) that says AI could wipe out humanity has just opened an operational biolab in the San Francisco Bay Area capable of conducting physical biological experiments.

Gain-of-function experiments have not yet been ruled out…

Anthropic says the lab is NOT specifically for drug discovery and declined to explain what it is actually being used for.

[Mario ZNA @MarioBojic]

🚨🇺🇦Handcuffed, beaten, humiliated, torn away from their families and certain they are being sent to their deaths.

This is what Ukrainian soldiers look like on their way to the front line.

[Uubzu v4 @uubzu]

Friends don’t let friends be distracted by spellcasters