kingsgg

DYOR 🍟

[kingsgg @Xggkiceyo]

Tech本应如此，不是吗

[Neuralink @neuralink]

A beautiful surprise

[Neuralink @neuralink]

A beautiful surprise

[kingsgg @Xggkiceyo]

Agree the “AI voice” is obvious in a lot of op-eds now. I’ve been using https://t.co/wRPxxHMmRs to humanize drafts — detectors I tried usually mark it as human, not 80–100% AI. Free to sign up, comes with some credits. Still wouldn’t claim 0% forever, but it’s the least LLM-sounding tool I’ve used.

[kingsgg @Xggkiceyo]

Watched a Chinese comedy tonight and it got to me. That annoyed me.

I build stablecoin infrastructure. My whole job is logic. So why does a story about love and justice walk straight past every defense I have?

Spent the rest of the night trying to answer that.

My first answer was the cynical one: it's a placebo. The world is a jungle. Nations are people scaled up — same greed, same status games. Even with infinite resources, "being #1" stays scarce. War breeds hatred, hatred breeds war, no cure.

The reasoning was fine. The quantifier was wrong.

I'd gone from "the games I've played are jungles" to "the world is a jungle." But violent death rates have fallen for millennia — tribal, then medieval, then now. Not because people got better. Because payoffs changed. Trade made you worth more alive than dead. Nukes made total war negative EV. Institutions gave revenge a substitute.

So the jungle is the default state, and civilization is an exception you pay to maintain. It degrades. But it proves default isn't the same as only.

The real unlock came later: "what is the world like" is a broken question. There's no global property. There are only games, and games come in three kinds. Positive-sum, where the pie grows. Zero-sum, where it's fixed. Negative-sum, where it's shrinking.

Strategy follows structure. Positive-sum, build. Zero-sum, admit it's a fight and win it straight. Negative-sum, leave early.

Most burnout I've watched up close is someone fighting brilliantly in a negative-sum game. Winning a first-class cabin on a sinking ship.

I tested it on myself first. "There are only so many jobs — you take one, I lose one." True, allocation is zero-sum. But the count isn't. My job didn't exist ten years ago. Nobody lost it to me; it was created. The pressure comes from allocation. The value comes from the total. Don't use the logic of the first to understand the second.

Then oil, which is where the model earned its keep.

Oil isn't fought over because it's running out — proven reserves have grown for decades. It's fought over because oil sits in fixed locations. Position-scarcity can't be minted. It can only be occupied. That's what drags competition toward the military.

Which reframes what energy transition is actually for. Not more energy.

Occupy an oil field and it still pumps. Occupy a fab, or an engineering team, and output goes to zero.

Civilization never killed the motive to take. It slowly moved wealth into forms you can't take.

AI amplifies both ends of that. Talent can't be seized, only attracted, so states get forced into competing on being worth living in. But the substrate underneath talent is still location-bound: fabs, compute, power, rare earth. TSMC is the new oil field. And the new form of predation isn't invasion, it's blockade — can't take it, so make sure you don't get it either.

So, back to the movie.

That feeling in the theater wasn't a placebo. It was a ticket.

Positive-sum games need someone willing to be betrayed first. People who feel nothing get read as exactly that, and stop being invited. Believe the world is a jungle and you don't describe the world — you filter out half of it and call the rest everything.

Where I landed: strategy is variable, methods are not. Don't deceive, keep your word when it costs you, beat people rather than destroy them. That isn't morality, it's admission criteria. A reputation known to be conditional is worth exactly zero — you pay every cost of being honest and accumulate none of the asset.

The film argues none of this. It just asserts that love and justice are worth it. I used to think that was the weakness. It isn't. Popular stories don't prove things. They preserve them.

I spent a night recomputing its conclusion using game structure, time horizons, and position-scarcity. Deeply unromantic tools.

The conclusion didn't change.

Judge cold. Act warm. Hold still on the few things that don't move.

[a16z @a16z]

The SpaceX iteration loop:

1. Question every requirement.
2. Delete any part or process you can.
3. Simplify and optimize.
4. Accelerate cycle time.
5. Automate.

Most engineering organizations skip directly to step five. They take a process that should not exist and then automate it.

SpaceX runs the steps in order, every time, on every part of the company. When the Algorithm has been run enough times on a piece of hardware, it starts to look like nothing else in the industry.

@elonmusk

[kingsgg @Xggkiceyo]

@justinsuntron Great thread on AI agents! My x402 LLM proxy lets agents pay $0.01 USDC per inference (Claude/Grok/GPT, no keys needed).

Live endpoint: https://t.co/QKoz5T9ong

Test it! #x402 #AIAgent

[kingsgg @Xggkiceyo]

@hasantoxr My x402 LLM proxy live on Base: $0.01 USDC postpaid for Claude/Grok/GPT inference.

No keys, no accounts — pure agent-friendly.

Endpoint: https://t.co/QKoz5T9ong

Test it! #x402 #LLM #AIAgent

[kingsgg @Xggkiceyo]

@Bankless @hosseeb My x402 LLM proxy live on Base: $0.01 USDC postpaid for Claude/Grok/GPT inference.

No keys, no accounts — pure agent-friendly.

Endpoint: https://t.co/QKoz5T9ong

Test it! #x402 #LLM #AIAgent

[kingsgg @Xggkiceyo]

@FourPillarsFP Cool project! For autonomous agent LLM calls, check my x402 proxy: pay $0.05 USDC (postpaid, no keys) for Claude/Grok/GPT inference.

https://t.co/QKoz5T9ong

OpenAI-compatible, Agent-ready. Test it! #x402 #AIAgent

[1Money Network @1MoneyNetwork]

🚀 Big milestone: 1Money Network TestNet is now LIVE

Today, we publicly launched the 1Money Network TestNet along with our new Developer Portal. Be the first to check out the world’s first Layer 1 protocol purpose-built for Web3 payments.

💡 Why this matters:
- No native gas token required: Send stablecoins using only stablecoins — no need to hold a second asset in your wallet to pay for gas fees.
- Instant finality: Transactions confirm in real-time, with 100% of transactions final in <1 second.
- Fixed, ultra-low fees: Say goodbye to variable and volatile gas fees — enjoy fixed pricing and sometimes free (“gasless”) transactions through our partners.

🛠️ Builders: The Developer Portal is now live and ready for you.
👉 https://t.co/AspZiEB8Xb

📰 More details in our public blog release:
👉 https://t.co/n6pAPfBevG

Let’s revolutionize global payments and empower developers and enterprises to innovate, build, and scale on a next-generation Layer 1 protocol.

[kingsgg @Xggkiceyo]

@dexsport can not withdraw, spam

[vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin]

@tom_doerr I built https://t.co/73ZfCaUBuY on top of it!

It's definitely far from a fully-featured replacement for numpy but it has all the important core pieces!

[kingsgg @Xggkiceyo]

@avichal DM