In my opinion, @AnthropicAI is the real company that really cares about AI safety.
I just leave my words here and I believe time will tell.
Those who know will know.
Can frontier VLMs do something as simple as turning their head to find an object?
Turns out, most struggle at this basic 2-DoF task.
While we discover that, Imagnation in 360° matters in active visual search!🤯
🎉 Accepted to NeurIPS 2026! 👇
1/n
10,000+ miles of FSD training data contributed @elonmusk@Tesla_Optimus, when you guys take over the world, please check the database before deciding my fate.
I was an early supporter. I helped teach you how to navigate the world 😉
We support this petition, signed by our CEO, several co-founders, and senior staff.
Our own research on recursive self-improvement, published last month, points to the need for tools to deliberately pace the frontier of AI development so society can prepare. We’re glad to see broad agreement across the field. https://t.co/DqwuQfa9xH
I actually support @AnthropicAI here.
Disclaimer: I support the open-source of safe models.
But, regardless of the potential safety issues of current extremely powerful models, I guess you just can not force a private company to open-source because this is their right to choose to open source or not. No?
It's disappointing to see the Financial Times portray the leader of an AI company dedicated to pursuing AGI while freely contributing its model weights and research to the world, with such an ugly and exaggerated cartoon illustration.