“my doctor” and “my ex” are both people you know. You’d react very differently to a text from each. Most AI wouldn’t.
It flattens every relationship into the same type. Connection is connection. That’s where it loses the plot.
• The fix is letting the model learn different rules for different kinds of connections, the way you do without thinking about it.
• This matters anywhere relationships carry meaning: medical records, fraud detection, recommendations, social networks. Basically everywhere.
• The strangest part: it often helps most on the rare cases, the ones normal models give up on.
More soon.
how do you decide when a model should think longer on a given input? confidence, difficulty, something learned? curious what’s actually working for people.
#AI#machinelearning
still kind of wild that anthropic is paying spacex $1.25 billion a month to train on colossus. you don’t rent a competitor’s data center unless it’s the best one on the planet. people really sleep on how far ahead xai’s compute is.
@PalmerLuckey@Lazarus_Capital@markpoloncarz UFC is peak, its takes incredible talent, skill, and discipline (maybe not health discipline for prates 😂). UFC this summer is STACKED
love this, the “more than did it finish” part is where i landed too. built mirage for it: a deterministic policy gate for agent actions, rules in yaml, no llm in the decision loop so it can actually fail a ci build. how are you scoping steeringbench, workflow discipline or the agent’s actions mid-run? link’s in my bio if useful
@elonmusk Huge for Grok 5. Does this stack make it easier to experiment with even larger models or novel architectures? The >10x throughput potential vs JAX changes everything at Colossus scale
true fault tolerance in action. starship lost one of six engines mid-flight and still completed its mission, deploying payloads and surviving reentry. peak engineering. congrats @SpaceX and @elonmusk on flight 12. #Starship
Been thinking about this lately.
The best agents aren’t always the smartest ones. It’s more about solid memory that doesn’t get messy and good brakes so they don’t spiral.
Feels like we’re finally moving past hype into stuff you can actually trust.
Anyone else seeing the same thing? What’s one small change that helped your agents?
@BipolarBastard the interesting case is structured data, things like medical records, transaction graphs, social networks. models there can’t tell one kind of connection from another unless you build it in. llms pick this up from language, which is a different problem entirely
“my doctor” and “my ex” are both people you know. You’d react very differently to a text from each. Most AI wouldn’t.
It flattens every relationship into the same type. Connection is connection. That’s where it loses the plot.
• The fix is letting the model learn different rules for different kinds of connections, the way you do without thinking about it.
• This matters anywhere relationships carry meaning: medical records, fraud detection, recommendations, social networks. Basically everywhere.
• The strangest part: it often helps most on the rare cases, the ones normal models give up on.
More soon.
Personal update: I've joined Anthropic. I think the next few years at the frontier of LLMs will be especially formative. I am very excited to join the team here and get back to R&D. I remain deeply passionate about education and plan to resume my work on it in time.
self-hosted sandboxes and mcp tunnels lock down the runtime well. but the model still picks which tools to call and what params to send. if the tool defs are too open, it can still try a broad delete or update inside your vpc. the sandbox contains the mess but doesnt stop the bad idea upfront. Im wonder how strict the mcp is on the checking calls before they run?
Using @grok is genuinely nice.
Straight to the point, zero filler, no lecture.
Just the signal I need when I’m knee-deep in research.
The rest of the ecosystem could learn from this.
agent eval benchmarks average over every tool call.
that buries the one call you actually care about: the rare, high-consequence one.
averages lie. i learned that benchmarking medication prediction.