Just some guy

I just like trying to correct misinformation. I try to hide any biases I may have, but that’s impossible to be perfect. Thanks. ;D

Personal Main

[Just some guy @YourJesterMan]

@REALDRGASTER …Doesn’t Alphys already have her own entry number 18?

[Just some guy @YourJesterMan]

@FakeNewsAnchor @XiikiiXiikii @stats_feed Britain went to war with Iceland for fishing rights. By far an incredibly stupid war.

[Just some guy @YourJesterMan]

@StarwalkerFan Chapter 3 is my personal least favorite, yet I still love it. As for Chapter 1, it feels a lot more fantastical and gives the starting points of character development. Chapter 3 and 1 are pretty close, but Chapter 1 edges out imo, though just because of my personal taste.

[Just some guy @YourJesterMan]

@TheGamingZilla @VorosTwins Normally I’m a bit more professional but this image sums up my opinion of that statement.

[Just some guy @YourJesterMan]

@Freedom2022Aye @TradSouthAmi @cottontailanna @libsoftiktok Pro-life and abortion viewpoints are considered a moral debate that, in the end, is connected to politics in how it is regulated. A business owner could kick you out for not liking cotton candy if they really wanted to. I should’ve added moral in my previous point, but still.

[Just some guy @YourJesterMan]

@davis_jbug2001 @TradSouthAmi @cottontailanna @libsoftiktok Just as a side note: Glad you brought something up I should answer rather than hurling a deflective insult like 90% of people on this website. You have my respect.

[Just some guy @YourJesterMan]

@davis_jbug2001 @TradSouthAmi @cottontailanna @libsoftiktok I agree that it is a moral/ethical question, though the ways that people try to answer it are via politics. Someone can use religion as justification for a moral argument, but the inherent reason for being kicked out is the moral argument, not the belief in the religion itself.

[Just some guy @YourJesterMan]

@TradSouthAmi @cottontailanna @libsoftiktok No, you cannot kick LGBTQ+ individuals from establishments. The US stops discrimination by race, sex/gender orientation, religion, origin, disability, and age. LGBTQ+ individuals fall under sex/gender orientation. This is different, since political views are not protected.

[Just some guy @YourJesterMan]

@Angelssound13 @cottontailanna @libsoftiktok By the law, yes, that business owner can kick them out. The government only protects individuals by religion, race, sex/gender, origin, age, and disability.

There is no law that protects against such conduct for political viewpoints.

[Just some guy @YourJesterMan]

@b_thomas_2103 @burryishere I definitely wouldn’t consider it the best, but it’s considered equal rights on paper compared to constitutions that specifically discriminate against queer people. That doesn’t mean it’s great in execution, but far better than a nation like Russia or North Korea.

[Just some guy @YourJesterMan]

@Lmao_Sauron @tiff4mahogany

[Just some guy @YourJesterMan]

@jur4nt @PSSMKR I think part of it has to do with monetization, but in the end that money goes back to a good cause. People would be more likely to click on that than no show. More money means more stuff to give out. It’s sad it has to be done, but he has to in order to continue that loop.

[Just some guy @YourJesterMan]

@dasd1234fsdss @King5897E64209 @avernicca @Qveen_Potato @burntfishie Those communist and socialist leaders were garbage tbh :/. They didn’t adhere to their principles without including authoritarianism as part of it. Certain socialist states, like Vietnam, work despite internal problems. Nordic countries have blended socialism+capitalism together.

[Just some guy @YourJesterMan]

@LastExit24 @EdKrassen Here is a graph from a research study from individuals of the Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society. It is peer reviewed and done by experts. By this data, the claim is false. While, as of recent years, left-wing violence has grown, right-wing violence is still more common

[Just some guy @YourJesterMan]

@FedeTales @iamaboss0 I personally tend to just avoid them. Luckily it’s not all they do, which thank goodness they don’t. I think it’s just meant to cater to a different demographic. I see it more as a “whatever pays the bills” type of dub. But even still, a very weird ship imo.

[Just some guy @YourJesterMan]

@TrashIsSwift @payloadprince @whooith “Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.” -Matthew 5:44. Even if you consider the LGBTQ+ community an enemy, you are directly going against the beliefs that you claim to follow.

[Just some guy @YourJesterMan]

@CiejebaMaciej @CiblesGD P.S: This doc is pretty long. I’d recommend using the search word tool to find where it’s most used for the best info.

[Just some guy @YourJesterMan]

@CiejebaMaciej @CiblesGD Here’s the tweet with the original google doc. There are two, one being this and the other being from Cibles. They released at similar times.

https://t.co/3wNnd1b2l9

[willyjwillyj @willyjwillyj]

CW: Sexual assault, sexual harrassment, grooming, abusive

While in the community, Shayy has committed reprehensible acts including grooming multiple fans and assaulting their now ex-partner. They are an active danger to the community. Please read

https://t.co/yZVqZEn8eN

[Just some guy @YourJesterMan]

@CiejebaMaciej @CiblesGD Twenty-one individuals. Some publicly known, others with their identity anonymous. While the majority not physically, he did sexualize people that were underage. I consider him a genuinely vile person for that.

[Just some guy @YourJesterMan]

@Ansthataintnew @CiblesGD How is that Cibles fault? I’m usually more civil than this but in what world is Cibles in the wrong compared to Shayy here? Shayy had 21 victims. TWENTY-ONE. Shayy did have problems, but in no world is it ok for him to sexualize others. Cibles just told the truth, and that’s bad?