🚨#BREAKING: Outrage is erupting after a White elderly couple in their 80s let a Black female stranger use their shower because they felt bad for her...
...she then ST*BBED THEM BOTH TO DE*TH!!!!
Now, she's pleading NOT GUILTY BY REASON OF INSANITY.
Yes, you read that right.
Their names were Darryl and Sharon Getman. He was 83, she was 80.
They had been married for more than 20 years.
On December 30th, a woman named Vickie Williams was seen wandering a retirement community.
Security guards saw her.
Cameras caught her multiple times.
One resident was so unnerved by an encounter with her that they hit a panic alarm.
...then she knocked on the Getmans' door.
She asked if she could use their shower and charge her cellphone.
Darryl and Sharon Getman, 83 and 80 years old decided they should show some kidness...
...and they let her in.
Sometime between 11 p.m. and 2 a.m., prosecutors say Vickie Williams grabbed a kitchen knife and brutally m*rdered them both.
A forensic pathologist testified they found of MULTIPLE wounds.
Both had defensive wounds, meaning an 83-year-old man and his 80-year-old wife spent their final moments fighting for their lives.
When police found Darryl, a butcher-style knife was still buried in his abdomen.
There were bloody footprints through the house and out into the garage.
Prosecutors say that after k*lling them, she WASHED HER CLOTHES in their laundry room while they
She took their car keys. And at 2 in the morning, a camera photographed the Getmans' green Kia Soul rolling out of that retirement community.
She drove it all the way to Savannah, Georgia.
And when she turned up at a man's apartment in Georgia days later, here is what he testified, under oath, this week:
"She told me she bought a new car."
She LIED about it and he said she was rushing inside "like somebody was after her or something."
She was arrested January 2nd at an Amtrak station in Savannah, still driving the couple's car.
And now, almost four years later, her defense is that she was suffering from 'psychosis" and should be found not guilty by reason of insanity.
Prosecutors say she has an arrest record going back decades of assault and robbery.
Say their names. Darryl Getman. Sharon Getman.
WE DO NOT HAVE TO LIVE LIKE THIS!!!!!!!
So it turns out China was building a hydro electric facility by a glacier and all the construction caused a portion of the glacier to collapse, tumble down, and turn into a mudslide that killed like 2,500 Nepalese people.
But all you will hear about in the news is leftists claiming this was because of climate change
Rome didn't fall because of barbarians. It fell because emperors couldn't stop spending money they didn't have.
The process was mechanical. Roman armies were expensive. The legions demanded pay, the frontiers demanded fortification, and the grain dole demanded perpetual subsidy. When tax revenue fell short, emperors did what every desperate government does: they debased the currency. The denarius, once nearly pure silver under Augustus, contained just 5% silver by the reign of Gallienus in the 260s AD. They shaved the coins, mixed in base metals, and still called it money. Prices responded accordingly. Monetary inflation causes price inflation, whether it happens in Rome 2000 years ago or in 2026.
You'd have watched this in real time as a Roman merchant. The goods sitting in your warehouse cost you the same labor and transport to acquire. But the coins arriving in payment bought less each month. Diocletian's Edict on Maximum Prices in 301 AD attempted to cap inflation by law, threatening death for anyone charging above the mandated rates. Sellers simply withdrew their goods from market rather than sell at a loss. Price controls produced shortages. Shortages produced famine.
The spiral tightened. As trade collapsed, tax revenue fell further. Soldiers went unpaid or received debased coin they couldn't spend. Loyalty evaporated. Provincial generals raised their own armies and declared themselves emperor (there were over 50 claimants in the 3rd century alone).
Free market thinkers have always pointed to this sequence as the purest historical case study in monetary destruction. When government substitutes political will for sound money, it doesn't bend economic law. It cannot bend. The Roman state inflated its way into insolvency, controlled its way into scarcity, and taxed its way into abandonment. Rome liquidated itself.
Rome handed out free grain to 40,000 citizens in 73 BC. By 46 BC, Julius Caesar found 320,000 people lining up for their monthly ration. That eight-fold expansion happened in under three decades, and it shows you how welfare states actually grow.
No Roman senator stood up and announced a plan to addict a third of the city to government bread. It happened incrementally, through political competition. Each magistrate who wanted votes expanded eligibility. Each expansion normalized the next one. The citizen who once considered the dole shameful eventually expected it, then demanded it, then organized politically to protect it.
This is the core mechanism free market thinkers have identified across every era: once you create a transfer program, you create a constituency for that program. Recipients vote. Administrators build careers. Grain merchants who supply the state develop a stake in keeping the contracts flowing. The political economy locks in.
Caesar, to his credit, actually cut the rolls back to 150,000 through verification audits. It was one of his more economically coherent moves, though the Senate still murdered him. His successors quietly let the numbers climb again.
What did the dole require? Massive grain imports from Sicily, Sardinia, and Egypt, organized through state logistics at state expense, funded by taxation and conquest. When the conquest revenue dried up, the obligation remained. Rome had written a check against future military success, and future military success eventually failed to arrive.
The lesson is not complicated. Distribute a benefit and you distribute dependency. Distribute dependency and you distribute political power to whoever controls the distribution. The grain dole didn't weaken Rome overnight, but it made every subsequent reform politically impossible.