@AutodeskAPS there seems to be a bug with the contact form, I'm getting error `TypeError: count(): Argument #1 ($value) must be of type Countable|array, string given in count() (line 256 of /code/docroot/modules/custom/forge_contact_form/src/Form/ContactNurtureForm.php).` Help!
After 15 years of owning the domain, I've finally shipped something to https://t.co/GoKfumGEqP 🎉
I set myself the challenge to use pure html/css and get 100% on Lighthouse
@BenLesh It's a shame it is only v4. While that's the only version that needs a secure RNG, the SubtleCrypto module has SHA-1 etc so it follows that v5 and others could all live in Crypto land
@tabatkins@Zephraph@orta@typescript Yea makes sense, I guess the question is should the tax be paid at the call site or the declaration site? I’d argue declaration as the call site should be used more than once
@tabatkins@Zephraph@orta@typescript As a heavy user of rxjs, I feel like the Hack style would be a mistake, but I’d live to have my mind changed! I wrote an article on the topic, I wonder if I was missing some benefit to hack style? https://t.co/MDlmsXeMN5
@BenLesh It’s such a shame as the general design principal is sound. The extension functions of Kotlin and how Rust handles adding functionality to a struct are really nice. Unfortunately the javascript implementation doesn’t allow for this to be done properly
@sindresorhus Isn't the solution of providing a "browser" entrypoint in the package.json which imports optional polyfills a good one here? Node.js users don't need to download the polyfills (and if they do they won't be loaded anyway) and browser users can decide what polyfills they need
@BenLesh I really hope this starts to sway opinion towards the point free style pipelines. I wrote an article a while back that explores the two options specifically in the context of rxjs - https://t.co/MDlmsXwobF